Re: MLB
Posted: Tue March 01, 2022 4:17 pm
162 games in a season, Mickey. Says so in the Bible.
lol nevermindSimple Torture wrote:I have a good feeling about tonight.
More or less. This is just the AL East, looks like they started with 2 series for everyone (wouldn't be surprised if they structured it this way anticipating lost games):Monkey_Driven wrote:Are they just going to cancel individual series in a piece meal fashion now?
they locked out the players. want to depress salaries. want a reduced luxury tax without a floor or minimum spend. cry poor while revenues have increased. want to expand playoffs for a pure money grab without any meaningful financial incentives for the players. are locked into an antiquated arbitration mechanism with onerous eligibility requirements. and refuse to address service-time manipulation or tanking. among other things. but that's not really what you were asking.Mickey wrote:How do you see this as the owners' fault?
Yeah it's more the viewership question I'm interested in--I definitely agree with everything you've laid out here (fuck the owners!), but I'm curious if/how those labor and financial considerations play into your sense of whether or not to watch Sunday Night Baseball.Chris_H_2 wrote:they locked out the players. want to depress salaries. want a reduced luxury tax without a floor or minimum spend. cry poor while revenues have increased. want to expand playoffs for a pure money grab without any meaningful financial incentives for the players. are locked into an antiquated arbitration mechanism with onerous eligibility requirements. and refuse to address service-time manipulation or tanking. among other things. but that's not really what you were asking.Mickey wrote:How do you see this as the owners' fault?
as far as my viewership, they run the game like it's 1970 and fail to understand that their viewing demographic is shrinking.
i know it's not an apples to apples comparison with other teams and other fans, but the ownership for the Cubs has managed to piss away all of the goodwill it built up after 2016 in about three years. from not investing in the on-field product to turning wrigley field and the surrounding neighborhood into a glorified carnival with every last nook and cranny monetized, it's really a sad situation. it's hard to listen to tom ricketts complain about revenue while charging the second highest amount for tickets in the game (the average price for a family of four to go to a game and not sit in the upper deck corner is nearly $400).Mickey wrote:Yeah it's more the viewership question I'm interested in--I definitely agree with everything you've laid out here (fuck the owners!), but I'm curious if/how those labor and financial considerations play into your sense of whether or not to watch Sunday Night Baseball.Chris_H_2 wrote:they locked out the players. want to depress salaries. want a reduced luxury tax without a floor or minimum spend. cry poor while revenues have increased. want to expand playoffs for a pure money grab without any meaningful financial incentives for the players. are locked into an antiquated arbitration mechanism with onerous eligibility requirements. and refuse to address service-time manipulation or tanking. among other things. but that's not really what you were asking.Mickey wrote:How do you see this as the owners' fault?
as far as my viewership, they run the game like it's 1970 and fail to understand that their viewing demographic is shrinking.
you got manfredSimple Torture wrote:lol nevermindSimple Torture wrote:I have a good feeling about tonight.
chris gets itChris_H_2 wrote:they locked out the players. want to depress salaries. want a reduced luxury tax without a floor or minimum spend. cry poor while revenues have increased. want to expand playoffs for a pure money grab without any meaningful financial incentives for the players. are locked into an antiquated arbitration mechanism with onerous eligibility requirements. and refuse to address service-time manipulation or tanking. among other things. but that's not really what you were asking.Mickey wrote:How do you see this as the owners' fault?
as far as my viewership, they run the game like it's 1970 and fail to understand that their viewing demographic is shrinking.
My post was in response to the tweet Chris posted, which said that it's the owners' fault he doesn't want to watch baseball in general now as much as he did twenty years ago. Obviously I think the lockout happening today is the owners' fault, I think you'd have to be insane to believe otherwise.Norris wrote:chris gets itChris_H_2 wrote:they locked out the players. want to depress salaries. want a reduced luxury tax without a floor or minimum spend. cry poor while revenues have increased. want to expand playoffs for a pure money grab without any meaningful financial incentives for the players. are locked into an antiquated arbitration mechanism with onerous eligibility requirements. and refuse to address service-time manipulation or tanking. among other things. but that's not really what you were asking.Mickey wrote:How do you see this as the owners' fault?
as far as my viewership, they run the game like it's 1970 and fail to understand that their viewing demographic is shrinking.
Manfred today blamed the calendar, there's just not enough time now. Well you locked out the players with the expressed intention of jumpstarting negotiations and then went away for 43 days. 43 fucking more days they could have had to hash this out.
cool coolMickey wrote:My post was in response to the tweet Chris posted, which said that it's the owners' fault he doesn't want to watch baseball in general now as much as he did twenty years ago. Obviously I think the lockout happening today is the owners' fault, I think you'd have to be insane to believe otherwise.Norris wrote:chris gets itChris_H_2 wrote:they locked out the players. want to depress salaries. want a reduced luxury tax without a floor or minimum spend. cry poor while revenues have increased. want to expand playoffs for a pure money grab without any meaningful financial incentives for the players. are locked into an antiquated arbitration mechanism with onerous eligibility requirements. and refuse to address service-time manipulation or tanking. among other things. but that's not really what you were asking.Mickey wrote:How do you see this as the owners' fault?
as far as my viewership, they run the game like it's 1970 and fail to understand that their viewing demographic is shrinking.
Manfred today blamed the calendar, there's just not enough time now. Well you locked out the players with the expressed intention of jumpstarting negotiations and then went away for 43 days. 43 fucking more days they could have had to hash this out.
as mickey pointed out on twitter, espn's jesse rogers thinks the players are are asking for too much. i'm sure it's no small coincidence that he's also the cubs' beat reporter.Mickey wrote:My post was in response to the tweet Chris posted, which said that it's the owners' fault he doesn't want to watch baseball in general now as much as he did twenty years ago. Obviously I think the lockout happening today is the owners' fault, I think you'd have to be insane to believe otherwise.Norris wrote:chris gets itChris_H_2 wrote:they locked out the players. want to depress salaries. want a reduced luxury tax without a floor or minimum spend. cry poor while revenues have increased. want to expand playoffs for a pure money grab without any meaningful financial incentives for the players. are locked into an antiquated arbitration mechanism with onerous eligibility requirements. and refuse to address service-time manipulation or tanking. among other things. but that's not really what you were asking.Mickey wrote:How do you see this as the owners' fault?
as far as my viewership, they run the game like it's 1970 and fail to understand that their viewing demographic is shrinking.
Manfred today blamed the calendar, there's just not enough time now. Well you locked out the players with the expressed intention of jumpstarting negotiations and then went away for 43 days. 43 fucking more days they could have had to hash this out.