Red Mosquito

Green Habit wrote:Team Nate.

Nate stole my worldview!

Bammer wrote:

Green Habit wrote:Team Nate.

Nate stole my worldview!

So you're saying he's gonna get cancelled any minute now.

"no consensus on what we want to accomplish"

um...

E.H. Ruddock wrote:"no consensus on what we want to accomplish"

um...

What is the consensus? Zero Covid? Vaccine Passports until Zero Covid? An endemic disease that we treat like the flu?

E.H. Ruddock wrote:"no consensus on what we want to accomplish"

um...

Is it this?:

Bi_3 wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:"no consensus on what we want to accomplish"

um...

Is it this?:

That was reversed at a later hearing. She had been advised not to get vaccinated by her Doctor due to some health issue.

simple schoolboy wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:"no consensus on what we want to accomplish"

um...

Is it this?:

That was reversed at a later hearing. She had been advised not to get vaccinated by her Doctor due to some health issue.

I'm less concerned about the ultimate outcome than what this tweet illustrates about the vaxx/unvaxx debate in the public square.

Bi_3 wrote:

Green Habit wrote:Team Nate.

This presumes not only some type of national level verification and enforcement process, but also a continued highly significant difference between vaxx/unvaxx people in terms of personal and social risk.

yeah i feel like the ship ultimately sailed on this awhile ago, when the US failed to implement a proper verification system around the vaccine.

or has it? everyone's names and DOB were taken down when they got the jabs, right? so presumably, this data could be pumped into a national database.

Bi_3 wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:"no consensus on what we want to accomplish"

um...

Is it this?:

That was reversed at a later hearing. She had been advised not to get vaccinated by her Doctor due to some health issue.

I'm less concerned about the ultimate outcome than what this tweet illustrates about the vaxx/unvaxx debate in the public square.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harm_principle

spike wrote: or has it? everyone's names and DOB were taken down when they got the jabs, right? so presumably, this data could be pumped into a national database.

I know here in NC they have a database of everyone because they did the lottery thing to give away money for getting vaccinated.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

spike wrote: or has it? everyone's names and DOB were taken down when they got the jabs, right? so presumably, this data could be pumped into a national database.

I know here in NC they have a database of everyone because they did the lottery thing to give away money for getting vaccinated.

your odds of winning should be damn good

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

spike wrote: or has it? everyone's names and DOB were taken down when they got the jabs, right? so presumably, this data could be pumped into a national database.

I know here in NC they have a database of everyone because they did the lottery thing to give away money for getting vaccinated.

your odds of winning should be damn good

Yeah but B lives in NC too. If any of his 8 kids are over 12, I'm sure their household will win it.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

spike wrote: or has it? everyone's names and DOB were taken down when they got the jabs, right? so presumably, this data could be pumped into a national database.

I know here in NC they have a database of everyone because they did the lottery thing to give away money for getting vaccinated.

your odds of winning should be damn good

Yeah but B lives in NC too. If any of his 8 kids are over 12, I'm sure their household will win it.

do you think they're all really B's kids?

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

spike wrote: or has it? everyone's names and DOB were taken down when they got the jabs, right? so presumably, this data could be pumped into a national database.

I know here in NC they have a database of everyone because they did the lottery thing to give away money for getting vaccinated.

your odds of winning should be damn good

Yeah but B lives in NC too. If any of his 8 kids are over 12, I'm sure their household will win it.

Lottery's over.

Also, all of our COVID data gets sent to CDC daily, so Ruddo, you're already in the national database. I don't know what good it does the Feds since there was no requirement to present any ID whatsoever in order to receive a vaccine.

If they start a policy of cracking down on the unvaxxxed, there are going to be a lot of sad people who gave fake names in order to stick it to the man.

B wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

spike wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

spike wrote: or has it? everyone's names and DOB were taken down when they got the jabs, right? so presumably, this data could be pumped into a national database.

I know here in NC they have a database of everyone because they did the lottery thing to give away money for getting vaccinated.

your odds of winning should be damn good

Yeah but B lives in NC too. If any of his 8 kids are over 12, I'm sure their household will win it.

Lottery's over.

Also, all of our COVID data gets sent to CDC daily, so Ruddo, you're already in the national database. I don't know what good it does the Feds since there was no requirement to present any ID whatsoever in order to receive a vaccine.

If they start a policy of cracking down on the unvaxxxed, there are going to be a lot of sad people who gave fake names in order to stick it to the man.

They should lose custody of their kids, amiright?

Green Habit wrote:Team Nate.

You can't even tell people to mask up on a plane without it leading to violence, but ok

Bi_3 wrote:

simple schoolboy wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:"no consensus on what we want to accomplish"

um...

Is it this?:

That was reversed at a later hearing. She had been advised not to get vaccinated by her Doctor due to some health issue.

I'm less concerned about the ultimate outcome than what this tweet illustrates about the vaxx/unvaxx debate in the public square.

Sure, just adding additional context.

That twitter account has been on a roll lately. They were yass queening the capitol cop that shot Ashli Babbit. The throughline is being gleeful about your political opponent's suffering. Seeing a lot of that everywhere.

lol horsey sauce

Bi_3 wrote:They should lose custody of their kids, amiright?

I'm sure that court case was much more complicated than twitter wanted it to be. Maybe poor COVID protections for a child was just one of many ways that family endangers their child.