Page 70 of 223

Re: College Football

Posted: Sun October 09, 2016 12:34 am
by BurtReynolds
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:have you pulled all of your hair out yet, burt?
nah. I still expect them to lose every game. I don't think they are very good.
i missed the first quarter, but other than the turnovers they're playing pretty well
Looks like they'll win the East by default anyway.
how did they come back late? i missed it while watching the bama game
I missed it too, actually.
what in the world were you doing?
living

Re: College Football

Posted: Sun October 09, 2016 12:35 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
BurtReynolds wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:have you pulled all of your hair out yet, burt?
nah. I still expect them to lose every game. I don't think they are very good.
i missed the first quarter, but other than the turnovers they're playing pretty well
Looks like they'll win the East by default anyway.
how did they come back late? i missed it while watching the bama game
I missed it too, actually.
what in the world were you doing?
living
lol

Re: College Football

Posted: Sun October 09, 2016 2:34 am
by Bammer
Bow Down

Re: College Football

Posted: Sun October 09, 2016 2:40 am
by Green Habit
Bammer wrote:Bow Down
Congrats, although Michigan is going to win the "They're Already Dead" award of the week.

Re: College Football

Posted: Sun October 09, 2016 3:59 am
by Bammer
Green Habit wrote:
Bammer wrote:Bow Down
Congrats, although Michigan is going to win the "They're Already Dead" award of the week.
The best thing about Michigan is that they will either win, lose, or tie against tOSU, thus opening that #4 spot in the playoffs for UW.

Re: College Football

Posted: Sun October 09, 2016 4:28 am
by Bammer
1. Are there any USC fans in the board?

2. If so, your thoughts on Max Browne?

Re: College Football

Posted: Sun October 09, 2016 9:02 pm
by swan
Bammer wrote:1. Are there any USC fans in the board?

2. If so, your thoughts on Max Browne?

SC alum here. Huge win yesterday, not ready to count them out of the Pac-12 South. Browne is the right choice at QB for the rest of the year. Impressed by his performance yesterday.

Re: College Football

Posted: Sun October 09, 2016 9:03 pm
by swan
Also, :haha: :haha: :haha: :haha: :haha: Ducks!


I grew up a Beaver fan, which is a terrible thing to saddle your child with. Last night's OT win over Cal was a fucking blast though.

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon October 10, 2016 4:09 am
by Bammer
swan wrote:
Bammer wrote:1. Are there any USC fans in the board?

2. If so, your thoughts on Max Browne?

SC alum here. Huge win yesterday, not ready to count them out of the Pac-12 South. Browne is the right choice at QB for the rest of the year. Impressed by his performance yesterday.
Um, you're talking about Darnold.

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon October 10, 2016 4:28 am
by swan
Bammer wrote:
swan wrote:
Bammer wrote:1. Are there any USC fans in the board?

2. If so, your thoughts on Max Browne?

SC alum here. Huge win yesterday, not ready to count them out of the Pac-12 South. Browne is the right choice at QB for the rest of the year. Impressed by his performance yesterday.
Um, you're talking about Darnold.
Well I guess that really sums it up, doesn't it? SC is one of those teams that doesn't put the names on the jerseys.

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon October 10, 2016 4:36 am
by Bammer
swan wrote:
Bammer wrote:
swan wrote:
Bammer wrote:1. Are there any USC fans in the board?

2. If so, your thoughts on Max Browne?

SC alum here. Huge win yesterday, not ready to count them out of the Pac-12 South. Browne is the right choice at QB for the rest of the year. Impressed by his performance yesterday.
Um, you're talking about Darnold.
Well I guess that really sums it up, doesn't it? SC is one of those teams that doesn't put the names on the jerseys.
:facepalm:

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon October 10, 2016 1:31 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
Guys, "SC" means South Carolina, so unless you are talking about the Gamecocks, please refer to it as "University in the shittiest city in the country". Thanks.

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon October 10, 2016 1:44 pm
by Green Habit
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Guys, "SC" means South Carolina, so unless you are talking about the Gamecocks, please refer to it as "University in the shittiest city in the country". Thanks.
Southern Cal does seem interested in monopolizing the common abbreviations for South Carolina. "SCar" is the only one I can think of that they can't, yet sounds good enough.

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue October 11, 2016 4:43 am
by Bammer
I'm just here to say that Jake Browning better tone it down a little or he's gonna end up playing for Cleveland.

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue October 11, 2016 4:47 am
by spike
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Guys, "SC" means South Carolina, so unless you are talking about the Gamecocks, please refer to it as "University in the shittiest city in the country". Thanks.
didn't that place become part of the atlantic ocean over the weekend anyway?

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue October 11, 2016 4:06 pm
by bune
swan wrote:Also, :haha: :haha: :haha: :haha: :haha: Ducks!


I grew up a Beaver fan, which is a terrible thing to saddle your child with. Last night's OT win over Cal was a fucking blast though.
As someone who works in Portland and is surrounded by a lot of Duck fans, this year has been great.

Re: College Football

Posted: Fri October 14, 2016 2:17 pm
by Bammer
Go Badgers

Go Vols

Re: College Football

Posted: Fri October 14, 2016 3:24 pm
by Green Habit
Bammer wrote:Go Badgers

Go Vols
Seems to me that UW doesn't need help at this point. As long as they do their job, one of UM or tOSU has to lose, thus they'd be in.

Re: College Football

Posted: Fri October 14, 2016 3:59 pm
by Bammer
Green Habit wrote:
Bammer wrote:Go Badgers

Go Vols
Seems to me that UW doesn't need help at this point. As long as they do their job, one of UM or tOSU has to lose, thus they'd be in.
Do you think Paul Finebaum and those of his ilk would agree?

Re: College Football

Posted: Fri October 14, 2016 5:23 pm
by Electromatic
Bammer wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
Bammer wrote:Go Badgers

Go Vols
Seems to me that UW doesn't need help at this point. As long as they do their job, one of UM or tOSU has to lose, thus they'd be in.
Do you think Paul Finebaum and those of his ilk would agree?

I don't think it matters, Finebaum isn't on the board.

Washington has as good a record so far as anyone. Really no need to start worrying about that until mid November.