Re: Post here when something gets CANCELLED
Posted: Mon March 22, 2021 6:04 pm
I still have no idea who he is, just that he's been cancelled.
He's the Sunday Funday ruiner.verb_to_trust wrote:I still have no idea who he is, just that he's been cancelled.

Not that I'm a huge TJ fan, but why would I choose this Middleditch guy over anyone? He's extremely annoying to look at.tragabigzanda wrote:Middleditch is obviously a shit. Ample reports of him basically strongarming his wife into an open relationship, also forcing TJ what’s his name off Silicon Valley. Dude needed an ego check yesterday. Fuck ‘im.
uh oh, privileged white male deciding where the line isverb_to_trust wrote:Groping is creepy. The groping was included under my creepy umbrella.Mickey wrote:You asked if there was more than "being a creep," and there is. What you do with that information is up to youverb_to_trust wrote:Have you ever been to a club Mickey? This stuff happens all the time. I'm not saying it's right but are we really going to litigate every single person who grabbed ass at a club and got shut down?Mickey wrote:Lucky for you he's also accused of groping (i.e. sexually assaulting) in the very same club.verb_to_trust wrote:So a guy acted like a creep at a club? Shocking stuff? If we're going to cancel someone it has to be better than that.
This seems like an obvious take, but worth mentioning nonetheless.Is this really just about some old Tweets? Probably not.
Here’s why: imagine you are a staffer at Teen Vogue. Your new editor in chief has just been announced, and she has no managerial experience, no experience editing, and no fashion experience. (And there’s also this whole episode.) You know more about running the magazine than she does, and so does the magazine’s lowest level intern. And now you are working for this person, who might have been a fine political reporter but has zero experience doing the job for which she was hired. What do you think staff reaction to that was? A cheery, well, let’s see if this works out! I’m sure it’ll be fine!
Isn't this explanation actually worse?The Town wrote:This seems like an obvious take, but worth mentioning nonetheless.Is this really just about some old Tweets? Probably not.
Here’s why: imagine you are a staffer at Teen Vogue. Your new editor in chief has just been announced, and she has no managerial experience, no experience editing, and no fashion experience. (And there’s also this whole episode.) You know more about running the magazine than she does, and so does the magazine’s lowest level intern. And now you are working for this person, who might have been a fine political reporter but has zero experience doing the job for which she was hired. What do you think staff reaction to that was? A cheery, well, let’s see if this works out! I’m sure it’ll be fine!
From Elizabeth Spiers, the founding editor of Gawker for what that's worth.
https://mynewbandis.substack.com/p/my-n ... ge-mistake
dystopian evenBi_3 wrote:Isn't this explanation actually worse?The Town wrote:This seems like an obvious take, but worth mentioning nonetheless.Is this really just about some old Tweets? Probably not.
Here’s why: imagine you are a staffer at Teen Vogue. Your new editor in chief has just been announced, and she has no managerial experience, no experience editing, and no fashion experience. (And there’s also this whole episode.) You know more about running the magazine than she does, and so does the magazine’s lowest level intern. And now you are working for this person, who might have been a fine political reporter but has zero experience doing the job for which she was hired. What do you think staff reaction to that was? A cheery, well, let’s see if this works out! I’m sure it’ll be fine!
From Elizabeth Spiers, the founding editor of Gawker for what that's worth.
https://mynewbandis.substack.com/p/my-n ... ge-mistake

also, mass shootings.tragabigzanda wrote:His potential challenger got caught in his own #MeToo claim (in his defense, he seemed genuinely contrite about the incident). Anyway, he backed out of the race, but it took over the news cycle for a couple of days, and I think that in the absence of a real challenger, there's less uproar. But I don't think that means this story is over.wease wrote:What happened with Cuomo? It went from hearing about it every 10 minutes to totally gone and no one talks about it.

"You turn a corner, and there's two people you don't know at all. And (Major) moves to protect," said Biden. "But he's a sweet dog. Eighty-five percent of the people there love him. He just -- all he does is lick them and wag his tail. But ... I realize some people, understandably, are afraid of dogs to begin with."