Jordan Peterson
- tree_
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 20146
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 6:27 am
- Twitter: twitter.com/uglyfurballz4life
- Location: Port Perry Lodge on voluptuous Lake Perry
- Contact:
Re: Jordan Peterson
I get that by comparison classical liberal seems conservative these days, which shows how extreme the left has become.
- Mickey
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9715
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
- Location: Tristes Tropiques
Re: Jordan Peterson
I'm not sure where Trevor got that idea, it seems relatively arbitrary. But an absurd man hawking insidious ideas to stupid people could certainly be quite influentialRob wrote:Tyler Cowen calls him one of the 5 most influential thinkers in the west, and Tyler Cowen is not stupid.Mickey wrote:1) I do not think Peterson is stupid, I think he's a clever but absurd huckster hawking insidious ideas to stupid people.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Jordan Peterson
classical liberal is charlie baker republican
it's equivalent to modern center right conservatism
it's equivalent to modern center right conservatism
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Jordan Peterson
YepppppMickey wrote:Sorry but again, you don't know what you're talking about. "Classical liberal" is just window dressing for "conservative". It's a term whose primary audience is people who know Ted Cruz sucks ass but are too stupid to see much beyond that. A classical liberal is someone who believes in a more or less entirely free market and small government--gee whiz, which political camp would you put that person in?
- Mickey
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9715
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
- Location: Tristes Tropiques
Re: Jordan Peterson
This is seriously not a point that needs to be debated. If you want to call yourself a "classical liberal" because you don't want to be associated with the hogs who hoot and oink for Trump, fine, whatever. But it's objectively a right-wing position.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Jordan Peterson
“Classical Liberal” just means “Alt Right” because the alt right doesn’t like that term.
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Jordan Peterson
I mean Conservative Republicans favor big government, redistributing wealth towards those who already have more wealth, and somewhat free markets as long as they protect those who are already in power, so I'm not sure there is a camp for people who believe in markets that are mostly free in a meaningful way and small government.LoathedVermin72 wrote:YepppppMickey wrote:Sorry but again, you don't know what you're talking about. "Classical liberal" is just window dressing for "conservative". It's a term whose primary audience is people who know Ted Cruz sucks ass but are too stupid to see much beyond that. A classical liberal is someone who believes in a more or less entirely free market and small government--gee whiz, which political camp would you put that person in?
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Jordan Peterson
Also, people who are on the more extreme edges of the political spectrum very often refer to themselves with terms that portray them as closer to the center, to make their views seem more reasonable and attractive to people in the middle.
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Jordan Peterson
Doesn't the alt right love that term? This is most certainly not true. Alt right is very anti-free market and quite nationalist. Classical liberals are neither of those things.LoathedVermin72 wrote:“Classical Liberal” just means “Alt Right” because the alt right doesn’t like that term.
They can both be wrong or evil or stupid, and you can even say the distinctions aren't meaningful, but they're not the same.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Jordan Peterson
Ah yes, if only there were an alternative right...4/5 wrote:I mean Conservative Republicans favor big government, redistributing wealth towards those who already have more wealth, and somewhat free markets as long as they protect those who are already in power, so I'm not sure there is a camp for people who believe in markets that are mostly free in a meaningful way and small government.LoathedVermin72 wrote:YepppppMickey wrote:Sorry but again, you don't know what you're talking about. "Classical liberal" is just window dressing for "conservative". It's a term whose primary audience is people who know Ted Cruz sucks ass but are too stupid to see much beyond that. A classical liberal is someone who believes in a more or less entirely free market and small government--gee whiz, which political camp would you put that person in?
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Jordan Peterson
4/5 wrote:Doesn't the alt right love that term? This is most certainly not true. Alt right is very anti-free market and quite nationalist. Classical liberals are neither of those things.LoathedVermin72 wrote:“Classical Liberal” just means “Alt Right” because the alt right doesn’t like that term.
They can both be wrong or evil or stupid, and you can even say the distinctions aren't meaningful, but they're not the same.
cutuphalfdead wrote:Also, people who are on the more extreme edges of the political spectrum very often refer to themselves with terms that portray them as closer to the center, to make their views seem more reasonable and attractive to people in the middle.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Jordan Peterson
Here is the entirety of my knowledge about JP:
1. In both clips I’ve watched of him speaking, he mistakes the word “divulge” for “diverge” (“we divulged from lobsters”). This is embarrassing.
2. He tries to make complex relationships sound simple or directly causal, like ignoring that serotonin (or its absence) has varied and sometimes contradictory effects in people, or misrepresenting both our relationship to lobsters (Christ am I even writing this) and what conclusions can reasonably drawn about humans from observed invertebrate behaviors. The difference between using an observation about serotonin’s influence on invertebrate social behaviors to inspire carefully constructed human research and using it to draw direct conclusions about how people should live is the difference between being scientific and being a snake oil self-help book wanker.
3. He writes self help books.
4. For a man with a psychology background, he seems absolutely awash in hostile attribution bias. I didn’t hear him speak of a single group or person he disagreed with, without falling prey to this very easily spotted bias type that every undergraduate psych major is aware of.
Whether or not he has broader intelligent arguments to offer, I was struck more in my 15 minutes of watching him talk by what he seemed not to know (or opted to avoid acknowledging) than I was by what he did know.
1. In both clips I’ve watched of him speaking, he mistakes the word “divulge” for “diverge” (“we divulged from lobsters”). This is embarrassing.
2. He tries to make complex relationships sound simple or directly causal, like ignoring that serotonin (or its absence) has varied and sometimes contradictory effects in people, or misrepresenting both our relationship to lobsters (Christ am I even writing this) and what conclusions can reasonably drawn about humans from observed invertebrate behaviors. The difference between using an observation about serotonin’s influence on invertebrate social behaviors to inspire carefully constructed human research and using it to draw direct conclusions about how people should live is the difference between being scientific and being a snake oil self-help book wanker.
3. He writes self help books.
4. For a man with a psychology background, he seems absolutely awash in hostile attribution bias. I didn’t hear him speak of a single group or person he disagreed with, without falling prey to this very easily spotted bias type that every undergraduate psych major is aware of.
Whether or not he has broader intelligent arguments to offer, I was struck more in my 15 minutes of watching him talk by what he seemed not to know (or opted to avoid acknowledging) than I was by what he did know.
(patriotic choking noises)
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Jordan Peterson
Got me. The racist protect our borders and make everything in America crowd is exactly the same as the open borders free trade smaller government everything crowd.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Ah yes, if only there were an alternative right...4/5 wrote:I mean Conservative Republicans favor big government, redistributing wealth towards those who already have more wealth, and somewhat free markets as long as they protect those who are already in power, so I'm not sure there is a camp for people who believe in markets that are mostly free in a meaningful way and small government.LoathedVermin72 wrote:YepppppMickey wrote:Sorry but again, you don't know what you're talking about. "Classical liberal" is just window dressing for "conservative". It's a term whose primary audience is people who know Ted Cruz sucks ass but are too stupid to see much beyond that. A classical liberal is someone who believes in a more or less entirely free market and small government--gee whiz, which political camp would you put that person in?
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Jordan Peterson
To be fair, they both voted for Trump.4/5 wrote:Got me. The racist protect our borders and make everything in America crowd is exactly the same as the open borders free trade smaller government everything crowd.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Ah yes, if only there were an alternative right...4/5 wrote:I mean Conservative Republicans favor big government, redistributing wealth towards those who already have more wealth, and somewhat free markets as long as they protect those who are already in power, so I'm not sure there is a camp for people who believe in markets that are mostly free in a meaningful way and small government.LoathedVermin72 wrote:YepppppMickey wrote:Sorry but again, you don't know what you're talking about. "Classical liberal" is just window dressing for "conservative". It's a term whose primary audience is people who know Ted Cruz sucks ass but are too stupid to see much beyond that. A classical liberal is someone who believes in a more or less entirely free market and small government--gee whiz, which political camp would you put that person in?
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Jordan Peterson
I mean...okay? So the alt-right and "classical liberals" are the same thing because they're both extremists that have given themselves centrist sounding labels?cutuphalfdead wrote:4/5 wrote:Doesn't the alt right love that term? This is most certainly not true. Alt right is very anti-free market and quite nationalist. Classical liberals are neither of those things.LoathedVermin72 wrote:“Classical Liberal” just means “Alt Right” because the alt right doesn’t like that term.
They can both be wrong or evil or stupid, and you can even say the distinctions aren't meaningful, but they're not the same.cutuphalfdead wrote:Also, people who are on the more extreme edges of the political spectrum very often refer to themselves with terms that portray them as closer to the center, to make their views seem more reasonable and attractive to people in the middle.
I was going to ask if classical liberalism is really "extreme" to begin with, but since it's being defined here as the same as the alt-right, I guess it is.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Mickey
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9715
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
- Location: Tristes Tropiques
Re: Jordan Peterson
I don't think alt-right and classical liberal mean the same thing. But they are both right-wing positions.
I do, for the record, think Chud is right about the tendency to obscure how extreme you are with uncommon descriptors, but a better example would be (I think) Steve Bannon's "economic nationalism"
I do, for the record, think Chud is right about the tendency to obscure how extreme you are with uncommon descriptors, but a better example would be (I think) Steve Bannon's "economic nationalism"
Last edited by Mickey on Tue May 29, 2018 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Jordan Peterson
If they did then I'm with you. Those are closet conservatives. There are probably a lot of them. But I think there are people who hold "classical liberal" values, and those people should not have voted for Trump. There are plenty of these types have been every bit as critical of Trump, if not more so, as they were of Obama. Again, they might be stupid and wrong, but a classical liberal is not the same as an alt-righter.cutuphalfdead wrote:To be fair, they both voted for Trump.4/5 wrote:Got me. The racist protect our borders and make everything in America crowd is exactly the same as the open borders free trade smaller government everything crowd.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Ah yes, if only there were an alternative right...4/5 wrote:I mean Conservative Republicans favor big government, redistributing wealth towards those who already have more wealth, and somewhat free markets as long as they protect those who are already in power, so I'm not sure there is a camp for people who believe in markets that are mostly free in a meaningful way and small government.LoathedVermin72 wrote:YepppppMickey wrote:Sorry but again, you don't know what you're talking about. "Classical liberal" is just window dressing for "conservative". It's a term whose primary audience is people who know Ted Cruz sucks ass but are too stupid to see much beyond that. A classical liberal is someone who believes in a more or less entirely free market and small government--gee whiz, which political camp would you put that person in?
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Jordan Peterson
I'm not arguing with you. You're right on the definitions.4/5 wrote:I mean...okay? So the alt-right and "classical liberals" are the same thing because they're both extremists that have given themselves centrist sounding labels?cutuphalfdead wrote:4/5 wrote:Doesn't the alt right love that term? This is most certainly not true. Alt right is very anti-free market and quite nationalist. Classical liberals are neither of those things.LoathedVermin72 wrote:“Classical Liberal” just means “Alt Right” because the alt right doesn’t like that term.
They can both be wrong or evil or stupid, and you can even say the distinctions aren't meaningful, but they're not the same.cutuphalfdead wrote:Also, people who are on the more extreme edges of the political spectrum very often refer to themselves with terms that portray them as closer to the center, to make their views seem more reasonable and attractive to people in the middle.
I was going to ask if classical liberalism is really "extreme" to begin with, but since it's being defined here as the same as the alt-right, I guess it is.
I've just noticed, mostly through working on conservative AM radio, that people who are clearly alt right in their views paint themselves in terminology that makes you think they're more classical liberal or traditional center right. And I think that leads to people like LV thinking the two are closer in ideology than they really are.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Jordan Peterson
You're right, they shouldn't have voted for Trump. But the emails...4/5 wrote:If they did then I'm with you. Those are closet conservatives. There are probably a lot of them. But I think there are people who hold "classical liberal" values, and those people should not have voted for Trump. There are plenty of these types have been every bit as critical of Trump, if not more so, as they were of Obama. Again, they might be stupid and wrong, but a classical liberal is not the same as an alt-righter.cutuphalfdead wrote:To be fair, they both voted for Trump.4/5 wrote:Got me. The racist protect our borders and make everything in America crowd is exactly the same as the open borders free trade smaller government everything crowd.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Ah yes, if only there were an alternative right...4/5 wrote:I mean Conservative Republicans favor big government, redistributing wealth towards those who already have more wealth, and somewhat free markets as long as they protect those who are already in power, so I'm not sure there is a camp for people who believe in markets that are mostly free in a meaningful way and small government.LoathedVermin72 wrote:YepppppMickey wrote:Sorry but again, you don't know what you're talking about. "Classical liberal" is just window dressing for "conservative". It's a term whose primary audience is people who know Ted Cruz sucks ass but are too stupid to see much beyond that. A classical liberal is someone who believes in a more or less entirely free market and small government--gee whiz, which political camp would you put that person in?
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33834
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Jordan Peterson
They are all shitheads who deserve to be exterminated, so what’s the difference