Re: Top 25 Favorite Movies
Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 3:44 am
And thanks for inspiring this exercise, verm. It was a really difficult AND a ton of fun. I'm sure I missed one or two that I'll add/amend later.
These are movies I really want to see.The Argonaut wrote:Darjeeling Limited
Pierrot le fou
Hara-kiri
The Exterminating Angel
Fitzcarraldo
Psycho
Killing Them Softly
You've never seen Psycho? Color me jealous. I've only done it a couple times, but one of my favorite things to do is to watch that movie with someone who's never seen it before.durdencommatyler wrote:These are movies I really want to see.The Argonaut wrote:Darjeeling Limited
Pierrot le fou
Hara-kiri
The Exterminating Angel
Fitzcarraldo
Psycho
Killing Them Softly
Op. Shit. No, I've seen Psycho. It's on my list. I just didn't delete it when I quoted your list. I adore it.The Argonaut wrote:You've never seen Psycho? Color me jealous. I've only done it a couple times, but one of my favorite things to do is to watch that movie with someone who's never seen it before.durdencommatyler wrote:These are movies I really want to see.The Argonaut wrote:Darjeeling Limited
Pierrot le fou
Hara-kiri
The Exterminating Angel
Fitzcarraldo
Psycho
Killing Them Softly
And I think you/everyone will love Hara-kiri. (Kobayashi, 1962).
Oh, you.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Psycho really is not a very good movie. By the end, anyway.
theplatypus wrote:*flips 'Days Since LV Has Posted Something Wrong and Bad' back to 0*
Oh, Perkins is great. But so many people just seem to ignore that the scene right before that final moment is a clinical, expository, uninteresting dissection of the film's preceding events that systematically explains away all nuance and subtlety in order to cater to dullards.durdencommatyler wrote:His face, his eyes, in that scene. *Shivers* Fucking haunts my nights.
I suppose I can see what you're getting at. It certainly isn't enough to taint an otherwise extraordinary film, for me.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Oh, Perkins is great. But so many people just seem to ignore that the scene right before that final moment is a clinical, expository, uninteresting dissection of the film's preceding events that systematically explains away all nuance and subtlety in order to cater to dullards.durdencommatyler wrote:His face, his eyes, in that scene. *Shivers* Fucking haunts my nights.
Yeah, if I were more passionate about the rest of the film, I'd probably agree (Bigger Than Life has a similar ending problem, but I still adore that film despite it). But while there are many elements of it I like (the falling-down-the-stairs sequence), I never felt very strongly about any of it. My relationship with Hitchcock is often a little bumpy.durdencommatyler wrote:I suppose I can see what you're getting at. It certainly isn't enough to taint an otherwise extraordinary film, for me.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Oh, Perkins is great. But so many people just seem to ignore that the scene right before that final moment is a clinical, expository, uninteresting dissection of the film's preceding events that systematically explains away all nuance and subtlety in order to cater to dullards.durdencommatyler wrote:His face, his eyes, in that scene. *Shivers* Fucking haunts my nights.
Have you officially ranked Hitchcock films around here yet? I'd be interested in the list.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, if I were more passionate about the rest of the film, I'd probably agree (Bigger Than Life has a similar ending problem, but I still adore that film despite it). But while there are many elements of it I like (the falling-down-the-stairs sequence), I never felt very strongly about any of it. My relationship with Hitchcock is often a little bumpy.durdencommatyler wrote:I suppose I can see what you're getting at. It certainly isn't enough to taint an otherwise extraordinary film, for me.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Oh, Perkins is great. But so many people just seem to ignore that the scene right before that final moment is a clinical, expository, uninteresting dissection of the film's preceding events that systematically explains away all nuance and subtlety in order to cater to dullards.durdencommatyler wrote:His face, his eyes, in that scene. *Shivers* Fucking haunts my nights.
I don't think I have. I still have a lot left to see.durdencommatyler wrote:Have you officially ranked Hitchcock films around here yet? I'd be interested in the list.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, if I were more passionate about the rest of the film, I'd probably agree (Bigger Than Life has a similar ending problem, but I still adore that film despite it). But while there are many elements of it I like (the falling-down-the-stairs sequence), I never felt very strongly about any of it. My relationship with Hitchcock is often a little bumpy.durdencommatyler wrote:I suppose I can see what you're getting at. It certainly isn't enough to taint an otherwise extraordinary film, for me.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Oh, Perkins is great. But so many people just seem to ignore that the scene right before that final moment is a clinical, expository, uninteresting dissection of the film's preceding events that systematically explains away all nuance and subtlety in order to cater to dullards.durdencommatyler wrote:His face, his eyes, in that scene. *Shivers* Fucking haunts my nights.
I'm surprised Vertigo isn't higher. What's your deal with that one?LoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't think I have. I still have a lot left to see.durdencommatyler wrote:Have you officially ranked Hitchcock films around here yet? I'd be interested in the list.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, if I were more passionate about the rest of the film, I'd probably agree (Bigger Than Life has a similar ending problem, but I still adore that film despite it). But while there are many elements of it I like (the falling-down-the-stairs sequence), I never felt very strongly about any of it. My relationship with Hitchcock is often a little bumpy.durdencommatyler wrote:I suppose I can see what you're getting at. It certainly isn't enough to taint an otherwise extraordinary film, for me.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Oh, Perkins is great. But so many people just seem to ignore that the scene right before that final moment is a clinical, expository, uninteresting dissection of the film's preceding events that systematically explains away all nuance and subtlety in order to cater to dullards.durdencommatyler wrote:His face, his eyes, in that scene. *Shivers* Fucking haunts my nights.
North by Northwest
The Trouble with Harry
To Catch a Thief
Vertigo
Saboteur
Strangers on a Train
Rebecca
Foreign Correspondent
Rope
Rear Window
Psycho
Spellbound
The Birds
The Lady Vanishes
It's #4! That's pretty high. I like Vertigo a lot. I just really love the top three.durdencommatyler wrote:I'm surprised Vertigo isn't higher. What's your deal with that one?LoathedVermin72 wrote:I don't think I have. I still have a lot left to see.durdencommatyler wrote:Have you officially ranked Hitchcock films around here yet? I'd be interested in the list.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, if I were more passionate about the rest of the film, I'd probably agree (Bigger Than Life has a similar ending problem, but I still adore that film despite it). But while there are many elements of it I like (the falling-down-the-stairs sequence), I never felt very strongly about any of it. My relationship with Hitchcock is often a little bumpy.durdencommatyler wrote:I suppose I can see what you're getting at. It certainly isn't enough to taint an otherwise extraordinary film, for me.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Oh, Perkins is great. But so many people just seem to ignore that the scene right before that final moment is a clinical, expository, uninteresting dissection of the film's preceding events that systematically explains away all nuance and subtlety in order to cater to dullards.durdencommatyler wrote:His face, his eyes, in that scene. *Shivers* Fucking haunts my nights.
North by Northwest
The Trouble with Harry
To Catch a Thief
Vertigo
Saboteur
Strangers on a Train
Rebecca
Foreign Correspondent
Rope
Rear Window
Psycho
Spellbound
The Birds
The Lady Vanishes