Re: What is Each Album's Major Flaw?: No Code
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 3:15 am
Out of the three you could pick... I just don't see how those stood out as a "lull" to you. Is it a production issue or a song issue?tragabigzanda wrote:Biggest flaw for me is the 3-song lull of RM, Lukin, PT. These three haven't held up well over the years, and having them in a row puts the album lower on the list of ones I want to spin.
Ok. I love how Lukin stands alone in their catalogue.tragabigzanda wrote:Song issue for Lukin and PT; I like those just a small fraction of the amount I did in '96. RM is just a performance issue, because there are live versions I still absolutely love (SLC'95 for example), but the album version has always underwhelmed me.evenslow wrote:Out of the three you could pick... I just don't see how those stood out as a "lull" to you. Is it a production issue or a song issue?tragabigzanda wrote:Biggest flaw for me is the 3-song lull of RM, Lukin, PT. These three haven't held up well over the years, and having them in a row puts the album lower on the list of ones I want to spin.
That three song run is one of my favorites in PJ's entire catalog.evenslow wrote:Ok. I love how Lukin stands alone in their catalogue.tragabigzanda wrote:Song issue for Lukin and PT; I like those just a small fraction of the amount I did in '96. RM is just a performance issue, because there are live versions I still absolutely love (SLC'95 for example), but the album version has always underwhelmed me.evenslow wrote:Out of the three you could pick... I just don't see how those stood out as a "lull" to you. Is it a production issue or a song issue?tragabigzanda wrote:Biggest flaw for me is the 3-song lull of RM, Lukin, PT. These three haven't held up well over the years, and having them in a row puts the album lower on the list of ones I want to spin.
I could see where PT doesn't wear as well, even if the outro is timeless.
Listened to RM a lot recently due to March Madness and I have to say, I found it sounded pretty god damn good. Felt that way about all of No Code really. It's got a rawness that keeps on giving.
That's the definitive version.tragabigzanda wrote:Yea, so much better. Although I miss Jack's approach, Matt does a great job on this version.wease wrote:It slays on LO2L.
It really starts on this album though. It's one of my bigger issues with it. I'm just not drawn to Eddie's musings on this kind of stuff.McParadigm wrote:Ending an album with a featherweight lecture about the importance of appreciating the here and now is a move modern Pearl Jam would definitely pull, which is just one measure of what a truly terrible idea it would be.
To be fair, stip's had a lot of practice in this field.tragabigzanda wrote:You paying attention MJD? Thais is how you make ridiculous claims about PJ within the structure of a very organized post.stip wrote:The biggest flaws for me are
1. The sequencing of the album
2. That thing I just said
3. Eddie's vocal choices. Too nasal/neil youngish for my tastes.
And a pretty strict training regimenBirds in Hell wrote:To be fair, stip's had a lot of practice in this field.tragabigzanda wrote:You paying attention MJD? Thais is how you make ridiculous claims about PJ within the structure of a very organized post.stip wrote:The biggest flaws for me are
1. The sequencing of the album
2. That thing I just said
3. Eddie's vocal choices. Too nasal/neil youngish for my tastes.