Page 8 of 19

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:00 pm
by PHATJ
cutuphalfdead wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:As hilarious as this is, it's still probably better than getting new music.
Nah.
The last couple times they dropped something new on us it was Ole and Skipping.
I like Skipping. Admittedly it is probably because I have two young daughters.

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:01 pm
by bodysnatcher
what the funk?

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:01 pm
by nah
PHATJ wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:As hilarious as this is, it's still probably better than getting new music.
Nah.
The last couple times they dropped something new on us it was Ole and Skipping.
I like Skipping. Admittedly it is probably because I have two young daughters.
and i like alive because i enjoy living!

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:02 pm
by Dr. Van Nostrand
EJ wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:As hilarious as this is, it's still probably better than getting new music.
Nah.
The last couple times they dropped something new on us it was Ole and Skipping.
I like both of those.
i definitely like Ole, but why dont i remember Skipping?

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:06 pm
by Norah
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
EJ wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:As hilarious as this is, it's still probably better than getting new music.
Nah.
The last couple times they dropped something new on us it was Ole and Skipping.
I like both of those.
i definitely like Ole, but why dont i remember Skipping?
Because it was entirely forgettable.

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:07 pm
by EJ
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
EJ wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:As hilarious as this is, it's still probably better than getting new music.
Nah.
The last couple times they dropped something new on us it was Ole and Skipping.
I like both of those.
i definitely like Ole, but why dont i remember Skipping?
Ed solo song for a charity:
http://stereogum.com/1017052/eddie-vedd ... ping/mp3s/

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:10 pm
by VinylGuy
digster wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote: The last couple times they dropped something new on us it was Ole and Skipping.
Those are both far better than this stuff. I've said it before, but I'm always surprised when I hear pre-PJ work from almost every member how a band so great came out of bands and music that were so bad.
well this music was made by ed 25 years ago? i guess they are pretty ok for a musician starting..and you can hint some of his later trademarks here too.

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:10 pm
by nah
if this shit almost blew this guys head off, he's got a weaker neck than paul pfeiffer

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:12 pm
by digster
VinylGuy wrote:
digster wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote: The last couple times they dropped something new on us it was Ole and Skipping.
Those are both far better than this stuff. I've said it before, but I'm always surprised when I hear pre-PJ work from almost every member how a band so great came out of bands and music that were so bad.
well this music was made by ed 25 years ago? i guess they are pretty ok for a musician starting..and you can hint some of his later trademarks here too.
I'm happy if other people like it; I think it/Bad Radio and Mother Love Bone (which I guess were the two immediate precursors to PJ) are freaking awful.

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:13 pm
by bodysnatcher
These demos would be better if Ed's delivery wasn't so breathy

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:17 pm
by Dr. Van Nostrand
EJ wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
EJ wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:As hilarious as this is, it's still probably better than getting new music.
Nah.
The last couple times they dropped something new on us it was Ole and Skipping.
I like both of those.
i definitely like Ole, but why dont i remember Skipping?
Ed solo song for a charity:
http://stereogum.com/1017052/eddie-vedd ... ping/mp3s/
thanks much for the link
i dont think i ever heard that one, but i tend to not care quite as much about ed solo stuff, i still like it, but dont always download random songs of his when they come out like i do PJ stuff

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:26 pm
by PHATJ
You guys should read the comments section in the Antiquiet article. The people that run that place are fucking lame. They instantly get butt hurt if the readers aren't thrilled with their every post or have the audacity to disagree with their opinions. it's pretty funny actually.

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:28 pm
by William Bloke
Well, I for one actually really enjoyed that. I'm quite the fan of a bit of the funk so getting to hear one of my favourite singers get down with the funk was pretty fun.

And seriously - it was the 80's. Give the dude a break. Trust me, I was there. In the 80's the 80's was the only place to be. And it rocked. Albeit in a somewhat saxaphoney/synthey/electric drummy kind of way.

Lots of seeds in this lot though - you can hear the start of some things. The guy could certainly sing too. And he's nothing if not sincere, and that's a good thing in my books.

8/10. A most enjoyable (and kinda fascinating) time piece.

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:31 pm
by Dr. Van Nostrand
Varis wrote:Well, I for one actually really enjoyed that. I'm quite the fan of a bit of the funk so getting to hear one of my favourite singers get down with the funk was pretty fun.

And seriously - it was the 80's. Give the dude a break. Trust me, I was there. In the 80's the 80's was the only place to be. And it rocked. Albeit in a somewhat saxaphoney/synthey/electric drummy kind of way.

Lots of seeds in this lot though - you can hear the start of some things. The guy could certainly sing too. And he's nothing if not sincere, and that's a good thing in my books.

8/10. A most enjoyable (and kinda fascinating) time piece.
this makes me a bit more excited to listen to these, ill get them in the ipod when i get home and see how they sound with headphones.

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:36 pm
by stip
are these new bad radio demos? I have a whole cd full of them.


Actually, in fairness, even though most of those songs suck (a few are kinda okay--and I don't know what antiquiet leaked), if I had never heard that stuff before I would think it was pretty cool, from a historical/evolutionary/completionist perspective.

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:47 pm
by nyquillyn
I think Ed deserves some credit for not burying these. I certainly would have.

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:51 pm
by nah
turned2black wrote:I think Ed deserves some credit for not burying these. I certainly would have.
um, he basically writes the music for abc's castle. i think he's over his awesomeness.

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:53 pm
by warehouse
castle?

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:53 pm
by Norah
theskyiscrape front page updated

Re: Antiquiet Tweet

Posted: Tue January 29, 2013 6:54 pm
by MadTIGERmaN
stip wrote:are these new bad radio demos? I have a whole cd full of them.


Actually, in fairness, even though most of those songs suck (a few are kinda okay--and I don't know what antiquiet leaked), if I had never heard that stuff before I would think it was pretty cool, from a historical/evolutionary/completionist perspective.
the sound seems a tad better on some of the tracks?
Homeless (acoustic) I dont think i ever heard before
plus a 30 second cover of What a Wonderful World
and Ed singing over the top of an instrumental track of a Kenny Rogers song? i think were the "unreleased" songs (they claimed)