LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'll watch this if someone can edit out McCarthy, Jones, and the 30 minutes of bad improv Feig will leave in.
It would probably just be easier if you didn't see it.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed March 09, 2016 10:16 pm
by Jorge
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'll watch this if someone can edit out McCarthy, Jones, and the 30 minutes of bad improv Feig will leave in.
You should do it.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed March 09, 2016 10:16 pm
by epilogue
dimejinky99 wrote:We'll know which t is of they make constant nods and anks to the originals. I really got the impression it was a follow on though. Just from the way some articles wrote about it more than anything.
For example, this is on the official IMDB page:
In an October 2015 Entertainment Weekly article, Dan Aykroyd confirmed that the film's cameo appearances by the original cast have them playing different characters. This is in line with director / co-writer Paul Feig's comments before filming, in which he stated that he did not want to make a film in a universe where people were already used to seeing ghosts (such as the "original" Ghostbusters (1984) timeline).
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed March 09, 2016 11:20 pm
by VinylGuy
Not exited at all....and its a reboot for sure.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed March 09, 2016 11:56 pm
by Mecca
theplatypus wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:We'll know which t is of they make constant nods and anks to the originals. I really got the impression it was a follow on though. Just from the way some articles wrote about it more than anything.
And the fact that Dan Aykroyd keeps referring to it as "Ghostbusters 3", and how a bunch of original cast members are making cameos (which, yeah, they could be playing other characters). I was definitely under the impression that it was a sequel.
Harold Ramis' cameo as a ghost, I'm assuming
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue April 26, 2016 10:20 pm
by bune
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue April 26, 2016 10:22 pm
by bodysnatcher
I'll probably get high and see this. Seems to be one of the few ways to actually enjoy it.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue April 26, 2016 10:38 pm
by epilogue
bodysnatcher wrote:I'll probably get high and see this. Seems to be one of the few ways to actually enjoy it.
I plan to enjoy this stone cold sober. And then I plan to enjoy it so much stone cold sober that I'll go and see it again stone cold sober. Then I'll probably buy it when it comes out and watch it 12 to 87 more times. Stone cold sober. And 66 times drunks as f*ck.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue April 26, 2016 11:26 pm
by spike
bune wrote:
this was funny!
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Tue April 26, 2016 11:54 pm
by Kaius
I gotta admit, this doesn't look too bad.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 12:40 am
by Simple Torture
Did we talk about how Ecto Cooler is coming back yet? It's all worth it.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 1:59 am
by B
Simple Torture wrote:Did we talk about how Ecto Cooler is coming back yet? It's all worth it.
They gonna sell it at the movie theaters or am I going to have to sneak it in?
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 2:21 am
by Mecca
B wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:Did we talk about how Ecto Cooler is coming back yet? It's all worth it.
They gonna sell it at the movie theaters or am I going to have to sneak it in?
it doesn't have slimer on it, so whats the point?
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 2:26 am
by Strat
Meh. Seems like its more fart humor and less dry. I dont know. whatevs
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 3:32 am
by BurtReynolds
i chuckled at Hemsworth. The rest look awful.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 3:34 am
by LoathedVermin72
BurtReynolds wrote:i chuckled at Hemsworth. The rest look awful.
you are the reason lena dunham is moving to canada
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 3:37 am
by spike
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:i chuckled at Hemsworth. The rest look awful.
you are the reason lena dunham is moving to canada
please calm down
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 3:37 am
by LoathedVermin72
spike wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:i chuckled at Hemsworth. The rest look awful.
you are the reason lena dunham is moving to canada
please calm down
make me
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 3:38 am
by BurtReynolds
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:i chuckled at Hemsworth. The rest look awful.
you are the reason lena dunham is moving to canada