Red Mosquito

So we are agreed. Old people shouldn't have the right to vote.

England may regret this when the ice caps melt and they are in need of passage to dry land

Apparently there is fine print and this referendum may not be legally binding.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho ... 93381.html

A really crucial detail about the upcoming EU referendum has gone virtually unmentioned and it is probably the most crucial detail: Parliament doesn't actually have to bring Britain out of the EU if the public votes for it.

That is because the result of June 23 referendum on Britain's EU membership is not legally binding. Instead, it is merely advisory, and, in theory, could be totally ignored by UK government.

this referendum is not legally binding yet

article 50 of the EU treaty must be invoked

given the relatively close margin of victory, wouldn't be surprised if there are challenges to the referenfum's legitimacy over the coming months

we were thinking about and typing the same thing at the same time but from different parts of the planet

96583UP wrote:we were thinking about and typing the same thing at the same time but from different parts of the planet

What a time to be alive.

let's run off to "K" and open a florist shop together

96583UP wrote:let's run off to "K" and open a florist shop together

True story: My grandfather's business was to provide flowers to florist shops in Hampshire, UK.

It's in me blood.

Birds in Hell wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:

LetMeSleep wrote:

What is the point of this? I see it everywhere. Yes, old people will die sooner. Should their vote count less because they will die earlier? "lucky" bastards.

And as you pointed out earlier, great numbers of those currently young and idealistic voters will probably drift towards more sensible and conservative views over time.

Why do old people even bother voting? They'll just be dead soon anyway. the old people are just trolling.

96583UP wrote:this referendum is not legally binding yet

article 50 of the EU treaty must be invoked

given the relatively close margin of victory, wouldn't be surprised if there are challenges to the referenfum's legitimacy over the coming months

This is seriously unhinged. What degree of hatred for the general public must you have to think this is a good idea?

LetMeSleep wrote:

96583UP wrote:let's run off to "K" and open a florist shop together

True story: My grandfather's business was to provide flowers to florist shops in Hampshire, UK.

It's in me blood.

the universe has drawn us together

to bring our flower power to the "K"

Birds in Hell wrote:

96583UP wrote:this referendum is not legally binding yet

article 50 of the EU treaty must be invoked

given the relatively close margin of victory, wouldn't be surprised if there are challenges to the referenfum's legitimacy over the coming months

This is seriously unhinged. What degree of hatred for the general public must you have to think this is a good idea?

i didn't say it was a good or bad idea

just a statement of fact

96583UP wrote:

Birds in Hell wrote:

96583UP wrote:this referendum is not legally binding yet

article 50 of the EU treaty must be invoked

given the relatively close margin of victory, wouldn't be surprised if there are challenges to the referenfum's legitimacy over the coming months

This is seriously unhinged. What degree of hatred for the general public must you have to think this is a good idea?

i didn't say it was a good or bad idea

just a statement of fact

I know, sorry if that wasn't clear. I just think the whole idea is bonkers.

Seeing as some lies in the Leave campaign are surfacing already, many Leave voters reporting regret coupled with a potentially unstable UK (and EU and then subsequent probable depression in England) then a second referendum is a possibility. I don't believe the government would just over rule the public wish.

Additionally, I have seen a report stating that if the result was under 60% (51.8%) and the voting turnout was under 75% (71%) then a second referendum can be forced.

There's a lot of sketchy reports being made so who knows what is and what will never be.

it is my bad BIH, I see now it was a reference to "one" or the "general you"

that's interesting LMS, as I was just tabulating that the will of the general public doesn't seem totally concise in this case

64.1 million people in the UK

1,269,501 vote victory for "Leave"

so if 1,269,501 votes / 2 = 634,750 people changed their vote to "Remain", it would be a tie

634,750 / 64,100,000 = 1% of the population

so 1% of the UK population is the determining factor in whether the UK remains in the EU or leaves ... ?

what's the margin of error on this voting process?
how many people have second thoughts now?
how many people couldn't make it to the polls that day and regret not voting?

for a 1% victory on a non legally binding yet vote, it seems like politicians are going to have grey area in which they could wrangle to preserve the will of the minority of the opulent and the majority of the millennial

it's what politicians do

this is going to be a shit show

can C-SPAN start covering British Parliament? I think Cosmo Kramer used to be able to get Canadian Parliament on some channel...

The people will continue voting until they get it right, goddamn it!

It's always the bloody 1%.

Henery Hawk wrote:And even better good riddance to Cameron total fucking failure just like that POS in the WH.

I'm sad to hear that the Whiskey Hut lost their Point Of Sale system. We should get on Kickstarter right away, or at least have a bake sale.

More like the British exit amirite