Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Sat March 11, 2017 1:29 am
Every time that image shows up on FB or Twitter.Self wrote:Cooks without giving up Butler?
- Spoiler: show
Page 8 of 25
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Sat March 11, 2017 1:33 am
I am much, much better at football than you.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Sat March 11, 2017 1:48 am
Strat wrote:What am i supposed to think about the signing of Reiff and Remmers?
KNow nothing of them but they are our new tackles.
Reiff is a generic middle of the road tackle. Not terrible. Not good.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Sat March 11, 2017 3:19 am
In other words, a huge improvement on Matt Kalil.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Sat March 11, 2017 2:51 pm
Remmers, on the other hand...@SkitchP wrote:Reiff is a generic middle of the road tackle. Not terrible. Not good.Strat wrote:What am i supposed to think about the signing of Reiff and Remmers?
KNow nothing of them but they are our new tackles.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Sun March 12, 2017 12:37 am
Someone please explain to me how Cooks helps the Pats. A guy who is literally one of the worst receivers in coverage is going to help a team that has tons of WR depth, doesn't throw a deep ball, and just won a SB w/o him? Really? The Saints wanted to be rid of Cooks. And the Pats will dump him next year too before his rookie contract requires big money. Just seems totally stupid to me.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Sun March 12, 2017 12:53 am
durdencommatyler wrote:Someone please explain to me how Cooks helps the Pats. A guy who is literally one of the worst receivers in coverage is going to help a team that has tons of WR depth, doesn't throw a deep ball, and just won a SB w/o him? Really? The Saints wanted to be rid of Cooks. And the Pats will dump him next year too before his rookie contract requires big money. Just seems totally stupid to me.
Coach wrote:I am much, much better at football than you.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Sun March 12, 2017 2:50 am
Edelman and Amendola are both on the wrong side of 30 at this point, I believe Hogan is 29 going on 30, leaving Malcolm Mitchell as the only young receiver on the team. Gronk is consistently missing multiple games every year, and Dwayne Allen is not capable of duplicating what Bennett did this past year, nevermind Gronk.durdencommatyler wrote:Someone please explain to me how Cooks helps the Pats. A guy who is literally one of the worst receivers in coverage is going to help a team that has tons of WR depth, doesn't throw a deep ball, and just won a SB w/o him? Really? The Saints wanted to be rid of Cooks. And the Pats will dump him next year too before his rookie contract requires big money. Just seems totally stupid to me.
The Patriots also do off season workouts with the Saints just about every year, so Belichick already has seen plenty of Cooks and obviously thinks highly of him to give up what he did. I'm surprised by the cost but I doubt Belichick is going to give that up just for one year of a guy.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Sun March 12, 2017 8:57 pm
Do you really believe Brandin Cooks will be a Patriot next year? Meaning, the 2018 season?
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Sun March 12, 2017 11:15 pm
It's a calculated risk the team can afford to take about not signing him long term. Brady tossed a few good long balls Hogan's way this past season, but Cooks takes it to the next level and I think he's like 23. Besides, our WC are old and Gronk will get hurt again. Losing Bennett in the passing game hurts too.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Mon March 13, 2017 10:24 pm
I believe they can activate his 5th year option, so yes.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Tue March 14, 2017 2:03 pm
Didn't you guys also add a TE though?Coach wrote:It's a calculated risk the team can afford to take about not signing him long term. Brady tossed a few good long balls Hogan's way this past season, but Cooks takes it to the next level and I think he's like 23. Besides, our WC are old and Gronk will get hurt again. Losing Bennett in the passing game hurts too.
What the Patriots did this year is trade possible future talent for guys that can produce now. It's probably the best option with a 40 year old QB. Not only that, they took one of the best CB's from Buffalo without having to give up Butler to get Cooks...and added pass rush from Carolina, Kony Ealy is a pretty good player.
Cooks will do for you what Gabriel did for Atlanta last year and I'm not sure they are all that concerned about him being around for the long term.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Tue March 14, 2017 9:42 pm
Butler's visiting with the Saints on Thurs to work out a deal for a trade. But I agree, I most like the Kony Ealy signing. Sneaky good.Electromatic wrote:Didn't you guys also add a TE though?Coach wrote:It's a calculated risk the team can afford to take about not signing him long term. Brady tossed a few good long balls Hogan's way this past season, but Cooks takes it to the next level and I think he's like 23. Besides, our WC are old and Gronk will get hurt again. Losing Bennett in the passing game hurts too.
What the Patriots did this year is trade possible future talent for guys that can produce now. It's probably the best option with a 40 year old QB. Not only that, they took one of the best CB's from Buffalo without having to give up Butler to get Cooks...and added pass rush from Carolina, Kony Ealy is a pretty good player.
Cooks will do for you what Gabriel did for Atlanta last year and I'm not sure they are all that concerned about him being around for the long term.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Wed March 15, 2017 2:21 am
all 300 pounds of eddy lacy signs with the seahawks 
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Wed March 15, 2017 3:51 am
Does he get unlimited sushi in his contract?spike wrote:all 300 pounds of eddy lacy signs with the seahawks
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Wed March 15, 2017 12:48 pm
I thought they already had a decent O-line?spike wrote:all 300 pounds of eddy lacy signs with the seahawks
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Wed March 15, 2017 4:00 pm
#Feastmodespike wrote:all 300 pounds of eddy lacy signs with the seahawks
Weighed in at 267 I'm told.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Thu March 16, 2017 2:54 pm
clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clapE.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already had a decent O-line?spike wrote:all 300 pounds of eddy lacy signs with the seahawks
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Thu March 16, 2017 2:55 pm
Wasn't their O-line terrible though? I can't get behind a joke that so clearly avoids the facts.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Posted: Thu March 16, 2017 3:05 pm
I was asking the question in the joke, I didn't know. So the joke standsSelf wrote:Wasn't their O-line terrible though? I can't get behind a joke that so clearly avoids the facts.