Re: Pearl Jam covers Brandi Carlile
Posted: Thu April 06, 2017 8:30 pm
For your referencedurdencommatyler wrote:I've never heard the original
For your referencedurdencommatyler wrote:I've never heard the original
Vocally MYM sounds nothing like those other three.tragabigzanda wrote:Seriously, there are at least four recent PJ songs that are fairly indistinguishable from each other, and would all sounds great while shopping at Hot Topic:
Supersonic
Ole
Mind Your Manners
Again Today
this was pretty decent. Need more listens, obviously. Reminds me a bit of that better things cover from a few years ago (Ed in particular).joostone wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:Yeah Trag, when was the last time you were even in a Hot Topic store?durdencommatyler wrote:Um, what? Come on, Trag.tragabigzanda wrote:Seriously, there are at least four recent PJ songs that are fairly indistinguishable from each other, and would all sounds great while shopping at Hot Topic:
Supersonic
Ole
Mind Your Manners
Again Today
I haven't listened to it yet. But I couldn't help noticing the running time is double that of Pearl Jam's cover.E.H. Ruddock wrote:For your referencedurdencommatyler wrote:I've never heard the original
it sounds pretty different from the original - somewhat reinterpreted, isn't it? I guess the second half of the original is pretty similar.Strat wrote:I'm more annoyed with their lack of effort to make it even remotely interesting. They learned the chords. Then they all played the chords. Adding nothing interesting to the perrance. This kind of feels like what the last two records are. Not utilizing their skills as musicians but rather a lazy approach to bashing out a by the numbers punk rock song. They're in their 50 bows and have been a band for 25 years.
Whatever. Re just a cover. But geezes that doesn't excite me
I think what I posted might be two songs on one video. Sorry.durdencommatyler wrote:I haven't listened to it yet. But I couldn't help noticing the running time is double that of Pearl Jam's cover.E.H. Ruddock wrote:For your referencedurdencommatyler wrote:I've never heard the original
I can't disagree with this. But that's something we've been dealing with regarding PJ for a decade now. Feels sort of redundant to keep sayint it.stip wrote:I agree the production doesn't do it any favors - it should feel more open.
durdencommatyler wrote:I can't disagree with this. But that's something we've been dealing with regarding PJ for a decade now. Feels sort of redundant to keep sayint it.stip wrote:I agree the production doesn't do it any favors - it should feel more open.
I don't agree that Ed has been phoning it in for a decade plus, though. I think he's given several compelling vocal performances over the years.tragabigzanda wrote:Feels sort of lame when the guy who sang Save You is willing to phone it in for a decade plus.durdencommatyler wrote:I can't disagree with this. But that's something we've been dealing with regarding PJ for a decade now. Feels sort of redundant to keep sayint it.stip wrote:I agree the production doesn't do it any favors - it should feel more open.