Re: Song of the Moment: Future Days
Posted: Thu March 27, 2014 8:13 pm
Lament wrote:It'd be a better song if at some point he said "THESE FIVE WORDS I SWEAR TO YOU! I SEE OUR FUTURE DAYS!"
Lament wrote:It'd be a better song if at some point he said "THESE FIVE WORDS I SWEAR TO YOU! I SEE OUR FUTURE DAYS!"
EJ wrote:McParadigm wrote:
I'm currently sitting comfortable at zero friends.
I'll be your friend.

No it wasn't. I quoted that comment because I felt that the chart placing was a "higher compliment" to the song than that comment, which IIRC you said was the highest compliment. Whether a song is good or not, it selling well is undoubtedly a compliment.Lament wrote:Ok, but the chart placing was brought in to rebuke bodysnatcher's comments about making a "bad song less bad."
This comment warms my soul. Almost lost a loved one today. I need to hear this again.Strat wrote:I found myself super moved by this song actually yesterday. I guess when you get close to losing someone you adore, cheesy shit hits the soul :\
If you recalled correctly, you would recall that I did not make that comment. BurtReynolds did. But since he gets less respect around here than Rodney Dangerfield and is constantly forgotten/omitted by everyone, you've attributed it to me.aurynsdad wrote:No it wasn't. I quoted that comment because I felt that the chart placing was a "higher compliment" to the song than that comment, which IIRC you said was the highest compliment. Whether a song is good or not, it selling well is undoubtedly a compliment.Lament wrote:Ok, but the chart placing was brought in to rebuke bodysnatcher's comments about making a "bad song less bad."
BurtReynolds wrote:it certainly makes a bad song less bad.Birds in Hell wrote:It's a start, I guess.bodysnatcher wrote:I took out the intro and outro Bo'B wankfest
Lament wrote:But at least this time is was bodysnatcher being forgotten, and not you. That's a step in the right direction, right?

That's a fairly objective statement for such a subjective artformaurynsdad wrote:Whether a song is good or not, it selling well is undoubtedly a compliment.
We've finally crossed the Future Days = Hitler RubiconLament wrote:If you recalled correctly, you would recall that I did not make that comment. BurtReynolds did. But since he gets less respect around here than Rodney Dangerfield and is constantly forgotten/omitted by everyone, you've attributed it to me.aurynsdad wrote:No it wasn't. I quoted that comment because I felt that the chart placing was a "higher compliment" to the song than that comment, which IIRC you said was the highest compliment. Whether a song is good or not, it selling well is undoubtedly a compliment.Lament wrote:Ok, but the chart placing was brought in to rebuke bodysnatcher's comments about making a "bad song less bad."
And if you honestly believe something selling well is "undoubtedly a compliment," well, then I suppose there's not much worth saying. Glenn Beck sells a lot of books. Hell, Mein Kampf sold 10 million copies in Germany before Hitler died. That's a pretty great compliment!
stip wrote:We've finally crossed the Future Days = Hitler Rubicon
And I've finally figured out what hand gesture should go with the song live.stip wrote:We've finally crossed the Future Days = Hitler Rubicon
I didn't want this statement to go unpunished, but I don't even know where to begin with this absurd bit of illogic.stip wrote:It's cheesy as hell, but it's unapologetically cheesy, which matters.
What also mattes, I think (a lot) and what separates this from, say Bon Jovi, is that it's coming from a band that normally doesn't write in terms of cheese, and has a pretty large back catalog moving entirely in the opposite direction. Cheese is a problem when it is lazy and manipulative and it is all you do. But there is an authenticity to it when the cheese is an exception, rather than the rule. It becomes an honest, unguarded, pure sentiment.