MLB

[Bammer]

For this one, I focused on Boston and the starting pitching they’d poach from shitty franchises like KC and Seattle. That then opened my mind to further possibilities.

Mariners are clearly superior to Red Sox this decade.

[lennytheweedwhacker]

5

I should quit

[blueviper]

3/9

[lennytheweedwhacker]

3/9

Let’s just start combining our scores to feel more better about ourselves

[doug rr]

what is this game?

[spike]

what is this game?

It’s MLB Wordle! Please join us.

https://www.immaculategrid.com/

[Matters]

Yesterday was bad, 4/9. Pretty happy with 8/9 today, KC, CLE and SEA felt like black holes.

[lennytheweedwhacker]

Who here is most likely to cheat

[doug rr]

I'm trying to wrap my head around this

[lennytheweedwhacker]

I'm trying to wrap my head around this

It is a little weird at first. The other day I guessed a mutual team one in the complete wrong block. I was so mad!

In this one the far right column is pitchers who had 200+k’s in a season for the teams in the first column. Then columns one and two are mutual players for the corresponding teams

[Matters]

It took me a minute to understand. For todays puzzle, in the top left square is any player who played for both Boston and Kansas City.

[Matters]

The top right square is any player who played for Kansas City and had 200+ strikeouts pitching in a season. I’m pretty sure the player didn’t necessarily have to have the 200+ strikeout season for the Royals, just at some point in his career.

All players past and present are eligible.

[doug rr]

I typed in George Brett and nothing happened...am I dumb?

[doug rr]

the only time it worked for me was putting in randy Johnson and Nolan Ryan..

[lennytheweedwhacker]

The top right square is any player who played for Kansas City and had 200+ strikeouts pitching in a season. I’m pretty sure the player didn’t necessarily have to have the 200+ strikeout season for the Royals, just at some point in his career.

All players past and present are eligible.

I took it as they did, but could be wrong. It made me a little uneasy about my Rangers pick if it does have to be

[Matters]

George Brett played for the royals but not for the team (boston or Cleveland) in the corresponding column, so that answer is wrong. You only get 9 guesses.

[lennytheweedwhacker]

I typed in George Brett and nothing happened...am I dumb?

And you clicked on Select?

[doug rr]

I'll try later...I dont really know any of todays players anyway

[lennytheweedwhacker]

I'll try later...I dont really know any of todays players anyway

It can be any era, but my mind instantly tries to go to mid to late 90’s for picks

[Matters]

The top right square is any player who played for Kansas City and had 200+ strikeouts pitching in a season. I’m pretty sure the player didn’t necessarily have to have the 200+ strikeout season for the Royals, just at some point in his career.

All players past and present are eligible.

I took it as they did, but could be wrong. It made me a little uneasy about my Rangers pick if it does have to be

I assumed at first that they did but a few days ago Max Sherzer fit for the dodgers and for a stat he certainly did not achieve with LA. (Although that was a career stat, not a single season stat)