Page 73 of 486

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Sun April 10, 2016 11:00 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:This is so insane

http://phys.org/news/2016-04-technicolo ... ottle.html
:shock:
Converting movies into man-made DNA brings huge advantages, said Bolot, who points out that the archives of every Hollywood studio, currently taking up square kilometers of floor space, could fit into a Lego brick.
Thinking about the implications of this is really tripping me out. My wife questioned if this means we could begin storing things inside our bodies.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Sun April 10, 2016 11:02 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:This is so insane

http://phys.org/news/2016-04-technicolo ... ottle.html
:shock:
Converting movies into man-made DNA brings huge advantages, said Bolot, who points out that the archives of every Hollywood studio, currently taking up square kilometers of floor space, could fit into a Lego brick.
Thinking about the implications of this is really tripping me out. My wife questioned if this means we could begin storing things inside our bodies.
Can you imagine?

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Sun April 10, 2016 11:04 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:This is so insane

http://phys.org/news/2016-04-technicolo ... ottle.html
:shock:
Converting movies into man-made DNA brings huge advantages, said Bolot, who points out that the archives of every Hollywood studio, currently taking up square kilometers of floor space, could fit into a Lego brick.
Thinking about the implications of this is really tripping me out. My wife questioned if this means we could begin storing things inside our bodies.
Can you imagine?
I can't believe no one seems to be talking about this. How is this not a huge leap in tech? It seems like this could redefine how we store data.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Sun April 10, 2016 11:05 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:This is so insane

http://phys.org/news/2016-04-technicolo ... ottle.html
:shock:
Converting movies into man-made DNA brings huge advantages, said Bolot, who points out that the archives of every Hollywood studio, currently taking up square kilometers of floor space, could fit into a Lego brick.
Thinking about the implications of this is really tripping me out. My wife questioned if this means we could begin storing things inside our bodies.
Can you imagine?
I can't believe no one seems to be talking about this. How is this not a huge leap in tech? It seems like this could redefine how we store data.
Absolutely. But I need to read more about it. I really can't wrap my head around what they're doing, what it means, how to retrieve it, etc.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Sun April 10, 2016 11:10 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
We've had this technology for years. Aliens

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Sun April 10, 2016 11:13 pm
by Rangi Guy
Image

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Sun April 10, 2016 11:13 pm
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Mon April 11, 2016 4:23 am
by LoathedVermin72

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Mon April 11, 2016 4:27 am
by LoathedVermin72
This looks like the most bland and unremarkable movie ever

http://www.mtv.com/news/2865156/fantast ... _s.fb_main

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Mon April 11, 2016 4:36 am
by tragabigzanda
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Mon April 11, 2016 4:38 am
by LoathedVermin72
tragabigzanda wrote:
Ha, watching all those no-name actors so clearly excited for a couple seconds of MTV screen time makes me feel gross. Movie could be really fun, though.
Yeah, it's an intriguing setup, despite Brie Larson's character sounding like a walking cliche. Just need to see some footage to get a sense of what the director is doing visually. Jurassic World has made me cagey.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Mon April 11, 2016 10:06 pm
by BurtReynolds
ANOTHER KONG REMAKE?

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

O.M.G.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Tue April 12, 2016 3:01 am
by E.H. Ruddock
So that movie The Huntsman has mine and my wife's celebrity "free pass" actress/actor in, so I guess we'll be seeing that.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Tue April 12, 2016 3:03 am
by LoathedVermin72
E.H. Ruddock wrote:So that movie The Huntsman has mine and my wife's celebrity "free pass" actress/actor in, so I guess we'll be seeing that.
Oh god that looks like the most unwatchable movie ever

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Tue April 12, 2016 3:04 am
by The Argonaut
Image
Your wife has weird taste in men.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Tue April 12, 2016 3:06 am
by Jorge
E.H. Ruddock wrote:So that movie The Huntsman has mine and my wife's celebrity "free pass" actress/actor in, so I guess we'll be seeing that.
You wanna get fucked by Thor?

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Tue April 12, 2016 3:11 am
by E.H. Ruddock
theplatypus wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:So that movie The Huntsman has mine and my wife's celebrity "free pass" actress/actor in, so I guess we'll be seeing that.
You wanna get fucked by Thor?
Yes jorge. Lol u got me.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Tue April 12, 2016 3:11 am
by knee tunes
theplatypus wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:So that movie The Huntsman has mine and my wife's celebrity "free pass" actress/actor in, so I guess we'll be seeing that.
You wanna get fucked by Thor?
you think you're thor, I can't even pith!

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Tue April 12, 2016 3:12 am
by E.H. Ruddock
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:So that movie The Huntsman has mine and my wife's celebrity "free pass" actress/actor in, so I guess we'll be seeing that.
Oh god that looks like the most unwatchable movie ever
I sat through "we are your friends" so I should be ok with a Charlize Theron movie

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Posted: Tue April 12, 2016 3:12 am
by LoathedVermin72
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:So that movie The Huntsman has mine and my wife's celebrity "free pass" actress/actor in, so I guess we'll be seeing that.
Oh god that looks like the most unwatchable movie ever
I sat through "we are your friends" so I should be ok with a Charlize Theron movie
I still wanna see that