Red Mosquito

Who spends more time thinking about covid: Nate Silver or verb?

Green Habit wrote:I'm probably slightly more bullish on booster shots, but the main vaccine mandate needs to be at least one jab.

The thing with boosters is that we know antibodies wane over time, but we don't know if that means protection is waning. People so routinely tested low for Hep B antibodies only to be fine upon exposure that the CDC doesn't even endorse checking antibodies in most circumstances. Their advice is to give the 3 shots and consider the person immune. Otherwise, you get stuck in an endless loop of boosting and testing low and boosting again and testing low again, etc.

So, low antibodies don't necessarily mean low protection, and we don't know how much the booster will raise antibodies or for how long.

Millions of dollars on an extra dose that is very possibly window dressing, seems wasteful to mean in an environment where that money could prevent COVID by supplying Americans with masks, home-tests, ventilation improvements, and renters relief or by supplying other countries with those doses.

spike wrote:Who spends more time thinking about covid: Nate Silver or verb?

You read studies so I'm guessing you?

B wrote:

Green Habit wrote:I'm probably slightly more bullish on booster shots, but the main vaccine mandate needs to be at least one jab.

The thing with boosters is that we know antibodies wane over time, but we don't know if that means protection is waning. People so routinely tested low for Hep B antibodies only to be fine upon exposure that the CDC doesn't even endorse checking antibodies in most circumstances. Their advice is to give the 3 shots and consider the person immune. Otherwise, you get stuck in an endless loop of boosting and testing low and boosting again and testing low again, etc.

So, low antibodies don't necessarily mean low protection, and we don't know how much the booster will raise antibodies or for how long.

Millions of dollars on an extra dose that is very possibly window dressing, seems wasteful to mean in an environment where that money could prevent COVID by supplying Americans with masks, home-tests, ventilation improvements, and renters relief or by supplying other countries with those doses.

Yeah, let's spend more money on masks. Jesus Christ. I can't walk down the street without seeing discarded masks everywhere.

verb_to_trust wrote:

B wrote:

Green Habit wrote:I'm probably slightly more bullish on booster shots, but the main vaccine mandate needs to be at least one jab.

The thing with boosters is that we know antibodies wane over time, but we don't know if that means protection is waning. People so routinely tested low for Hep B antibodies only to be fine upon exposure that the CDC doesn't even endorse checking antibodies in most circumstances. Their advice is to give the 3 shots and consider the person immune. Otherwise, you get stuck in an endless loop of boosting and testing low and boosting again and testing low again, etc.

So, low antibodies don't necessarily mean low protection, and we don't know how much the booster will raise antibodies or for how long.

Millions of dollars on an extra dose that is very possibly window dressing, seems wasteful to mean in an environment where that money could prevent COVID by supplying Americans with masks, home-tests, ventilation improvements, and renters relief or by supplying other countries with those doses.

Yeah, let's spend more money on masks. Jesus Christ. I can't walk down the street without seeing discarded masks everywhere.

this is where i might agree with you. I can't stand litter. pet peeve.

dad wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

B wrote:

Green Habit wrote:I'm probably slightly more bullish on booster shots, but the main vaccine mandate needs to be at least one jab.

The thing with boosters is that we know antibodies wane over time, but we don't know if that means protection is waning. People so routinely tested low for Hep B antibodies only to be fine upon exposure that the CDC doesn't even endorse checking antibodies in most circumstances. Their advice is to give the 3 shots and consider the person immune. Otherwise, you get stuck in an endless loop of boosting and testing low and boosting again and testing low again, etc.

So, low antibodies don't necessarily mean low protection, and we don't know how much the booster will raise antibodies or for how long.

Millions of dollars on an extra dose that is very possibly window dressing, seems wasteful to mean in an environment where that money could prevent COVID by supplying Americans with masks, home-tests, ventilation improvements, and renters relief or by supplying other countries with those doses.

Yeah, let's spend more money on masks. Jesus Christ. I can't walk down the street without seeing discarded masks everywhere.

this is where i might agree with you. I can't stand litter. pet peeve.

Moline’s a shithole.

spike wrote:

dad wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

B wrote:

Green Habit wrote:I'm probably slightly more bullish on booster shots, but the main vaccine mandate needs to be at least one jab.

The thing with boosters is that we know antibodies wane over time, but we don't know if that means protection is waning. People so routinely tested low for Hep B antibodies only to be fine upon exposure that the CDC doesn't even endorse checking antibodies in most circumstances. Their advice is to give the 3 shots and consider the person immune. Otherwise, you get stuck in an endless loop of boosting and testing low and boosting again and testing low again, etc.

So, low antibodies don't necessarily mean low protection, and we don't know how much the booster will raise antibodies or for how long.

Millions of dollars on an extra dose that is very possibly window dressing, seems wasteful to mean in an environment where that money could prevent COVID by supplying Americans with masks, home-tests, ventilation improvements, and renters relief or by supplying other countries with those doses.

Yeah, let's spend more money on masks. Jesus Christ. I can't walk down the street without seeing discarded masks everywhere.

this is where i might agree with you. I can't stand litter. pet peeve.

Moline’s a shithole.

ah yes, the source of his petulance.

spike wrote:

dad wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

B wrote:

Green Habit wrote:I'm probably slightly more bullish on booster shots, but the main vaccine mandate needs to be at least one jab.

The thing with boosters is that we know antibodies wane over time, but we don't know if that means protection is waning. People so routinely tested low for Hep B antibodies only to be fine upon exposure that the CDC doesn't even endorse checking antibodies in most circumstances. Their advice is to give the 3 shots and consider the person immune. Otherwise, you get stuck in an endless loop of boosting and testing low and boosting again and testing low again, etc.

So, low antibodies don't necessarily mean low protection, and we don't know how much the booster will raise antibodies or for how long.

Millions of dollars on an extra dose that is very possibly window dressing, seems wasteful to mean in an environment where that money could prevent COVID by supplying Americans with masks, home-tests, ventilation improvements, and renters relief or by supplying other countries with those doses.

Yeah, let's spend more money on masks. Jesus Christ. I can't walk down the street without seeing discarded masks everywhere.

this is where i might agree with you. I can't stand litter. pet peeve.

Moline’s a shithole.

Don't live there, but okay?

I mean

verb_to_trust wrote:Airfare? The band is playing Moline, IL.... which I can basically throw a rock to from my front yard and I'm probably not even going to go....

lol@airfare....

verb_to_trust wrote:

B wrote:

Green Habit wrote:I'm probably slightly more bullish on booster shots, but the main vaccine mandate needs to be at least one jab.

The thing with boosters is that we know antibodies wane over time, but we don't know if that means protection is waning. People so routinely tested low for Hep B antibodies only to be fine upon exposure that the CDC doesn't even endorse checking antibodies in most circumstances. Their advice is to give the 3 shots and consider the person immune. Otherwise, you get stuck in an endless loop of boosting and testing low and boosting again and testing low again, etc.

So, low antibodies don't necessarily mean low protection, and we don't know how much the booster will raise antibodies or for how long.

Millions of dollars on an extra dose that is very possibly window dressing, seems wasteful to mean in an environment where that money could prevent COVID by supplying Americans with masks, home-tests, ventilation improvements, and renters relief or by supplying other countries with those doses.

Yeah, let's spend more money on masks. Jesus Christ. I can't walk down the street without seeing discarded masks everywhere.

Feel free to allocate money into those other options if the word mask triggers you, snowflake.

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:Who spends more time thinking about covid: Nate Silver or verb?

You read studies so I'm guessing you?

That wasn't an option, dipshit. Learn to read.

JuanHamm wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:Who spends more time thinking about covid: Nate Silver or verb?

You read studies so I'm guessing you?

That wasn't an option, dipshit. Learn to read.

Mods?

B wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

B wrote:

Green Habit wrote:I'm probably slightly more bullish on booster shots, but the main vaccine mandate needs to be at least one jab.

The thing with boosters is that we know antibodies wane over time, but we don't know if that means protection is waning. People so routinely tested low for Hep B antibodies only to be fine upon exposure that the CDC doesn't even endorse checking antibodies in most circumstances. Their advice is to give the 3 shots and consider the person immune. Otherwise, you get stuck in an endless loop of boosting and testing low and boosting again and testing low again, etc.

So, low antibodies don't necessarily mean low protection, and we don't know how much the booster will raise antibodies or for how long.

Millions of dollars on an extra dose that is very possibly window dressing, seems wasteful to mean in an environment where that money could prevent COVID by supplying Americans with masks, home-tests, ventilation improvements, and renters relief or by supplying other countries with those doses.

Yeah, let's spend more money on masks. Jesus Christ. I can't walk down the street without seeing discarded masks everywhere.

Feel free to allocate money into those other options if the word mask triggers you, snowflake.

My point stands. If you want more masks send a barge out to the ocean. Free!

spike wrote:I mean

verb_to_trust wrote:Airfare? The band is playing Moline, IL.... which I can basically throw a rock to from my front yard and I'm probably not even going to go....

lol@airfare....

I don't live in Moline you fucking creep. I'm sure you'll doxx my exact location out of me somehow and then win poster of the year in GD or something.

I’m popping some corn.

verb_to_trust wrote:

JuanHamm wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:Who spends more time thinking about covid: Nate Silver or verb?

You read studies so I'm guessing you?

That wasn't an option, dipshit. Learn to read.

Mods?

Pretty funny that mods have to read every post in every thread

Bammer wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

JuanHamm wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:Who spends more time thinking about covid: Nate Silver or verb?

You read studies so I'm guessing you?

That wasn't an option, dipshit. Learn to read.

Mods?

Pretty funny that mods have to read every post in every thread

They don't but you can bet every time someone reports me B and Ruddo run to the modcave

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:I mean

verb_to_trust wrote:Airfare? The band is playing Moline, IL.... which I can basically throw a rock to from my front yard and I'm probably not even going to go....

lol@airfare....

I don't live in Moline you fucking creep. I'm sure you'll doxx my exact location out of me somehow and then win poster of the year in GD or something.

that’s lenny’s job

verb_to_trust wrote:

Bammer wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

JuanHamm wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:

spike wrote:Who spends more time thinking about covid: Nate Silver or verb?

You read studies so I'm guessing you?

That wasn't an option, dipshit. Learn to read.

Mods?

Pretty funny that mods have to read every post in every thread

They don't but you can bet every time someone reports me B and Ruddo run to the modcave

That's sweet that you think that, but I don't give a shit or a thought about you outside of reading your posts in this thread.

pearl jam