Transgender Rights

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Bi_3 »

B, two posts up from yours she “wholeheartedly” endorsed puberty blockers without parental consent
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2889
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Rob »

BurtReynolds wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:I know a lot about anti-trans stigma and the fears of transphobes about changed bodies; I know because I live it
That's nice. Let me know when it gives you psychic powers.

It probably helps that you interpret any and all criticism, questioning and disagreement as inherently a threat to your very existence and definitionally anti-trans. Such hubris! Under that lens, it must seem as common as breathing. Literally everything that exists contrary to your control is transphobic. You've completely walled yourself off from any alternatives.

I think one of the closest things to a universal human trait is care for children's health, barring a few sickos. To believe otherwise is to have a cartoonish and deeply warped view of the world and people.
Yes. This post is a good example of how many feel.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25049
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by B »

Bi_3 wrote:B, two posts up from yours she “wholeheartedly” endorsed puberty blockers without parental consent
Fair enough. I'm clearly not there. I've struck the two offending words.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22815
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Bammer »

Mickey wrote:It's sobering to see a Verb post on page one that's not even particularly hateful. What happened to that boy
I, too, took a stroll down memory lane to the beginning of this thread and I’m not quite sure what to make of this:
B wrote: Image
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Ello Sailor
Posting (live)
Posts: 17744
Joined: Sun March 12, 2017 3:06 pm

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Ello Sailor »

:facepalm:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:soulseek 4 lyfe
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22815
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Bammer »

I find myself agreeing with most of that John Oliver piece.

He glossed over the Olympics evaluating eligibility on a sport by sport basis. I take that to mean the Olympics acknowledges that it simply wouldn’t be fair for certain sports. That hurdle is one I personally don’t think I’ll ever get over.

Some of the medical stuff like puberty blockers, I don’t know enough to comment on.
(she/him/theirs)
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Ms Harmless »

B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:B, two posts up from yours she “wholeheartedly” endorsed puberty blockers without parental consent
Fair enough. I'm clearly not there. I've struck the two offending words.
I think parental consent needs to be questioned in a lot of cases -- for example, if a child confidentially comes out at school to a counsellor, they should not be "outed" to their parents, it's potentially very dangerous

I feel like, if young people in schools can get free condoms, menstrual products and birth control, we can ideally, eventually, move society forward so that puberty blockers are included

it hasn't been long since married trans people had to get spousal consent to transition, which is a similar control tactic

but fwiw, in the grand scheme of things that's a small point of disagreement; if B isn't quite there it's OK, the main thing is to underline that trans kids need these and they need (controlled, but not gatekept) access to them
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Bi_3 »

Bammer wrote:I find myself agreeing with most of that John Oliver piece.

He glossed over the Olympics evaluating eligibility on a sport by sport basis. I take that to mean the Olympics acknowledges that it simply wouldn’t be fair for certain sports. That hurdle is one I personally don’t think I’ll ever get over.

Some of the medical stuff like puberty blockers, I don’t know enough to comment on.

Someone hacked bammer’s account
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25049
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by B »

Bammer wrote:
Mickey wrote:It's sobering to see a Verb post on page one that's not even particularly hateful. What happened to that boy
I, too, took a stroll down memory lane to the beginning of this thread and I’m not quite sure what to make of this:
B wrote: Image
Is it your implication that I posted in support of the original tweet and not for a laugh?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25049
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by B »

Ms Harmless wrote:
B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:B, two posts up from yours she “wholeheartedly” endorsed puberty blockers without parental consent
Fair enough. I'm clearly not there. I've struck the two offending words.
I think parental consent needs to be questioned in a lot of cases -- for example, if a child confidentially comes out at school to a counsellor, they should not be "outed" to their parents, it's potentially very dangerous

I feel like, if young people in schools can get free condoms, menstrual products and birth control, we can ideally, eventually, move society forward so that puberty blockers are included

it hasn't been long since married trans people had to get spousal consent to transition, which is a similar control tactic

but fwiw, in the grand scheme of things that's a small point of disagreement; if B isn't quite there it's OK, the main thing is to underline that trans kids need these and they need (controlled, but not gatekept) access to them
Of your 3 examples, only 1 is a medication, and it's possibly the most used prescription med in the world.

There are mechanisms for all sorts of things that allow kids to seek treatment without parental consent. Nothing in this debate has convinced me that the default should be to provide them without parental permission.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25049
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by B »

Oh, and definitely no one should ever out kids to their parents.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Ms Harmless »

B wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:B, two posts up from yours she “wholeheartedly” endorsed puberty blockers without parental consent
Fair enough. I'm clearly not there. I've struck the two offending words.
I think parental consent needs to be questioned in a lot of cases -- for example, if a child confidentially comes out at school to a counsellor, they should not be "outed" to their parents, it's potentially very dangerous

I feel like, if young people in schools can get free condoms, menstrual products and birth control, we can ideally, eventually, move society forward so that puberty blockers are included

it hasn't been long since married trans people had to get spousal consent to transition, which is a similar control tactic

but fwiw, in the grand scheme of things that's a small point of disagreement; if B isn't quite there it's OK, the main thing is to underline that trans kids need these and they need (controlled, but not gatekept) access to them
Of your 3 examples, only 1 is a medication, and it's possibly the most used prescription med in the world.

There are mechanisms for all sorts of things that allow kids to seek treatment without parental consent. Nothing in this debate has convinced me that the default should be to provide them without parental permission.
1. sure, the 3 I listed are not all strictly medications, but they are all gender-based and sexual healthcare; that's why I grouped them together, and why I group them when I speak on this as an LGBTQ+ person

2. OK, truce; I'm not committed to this as "default", but I do want that mechanism; kids should not have to involve parents where it is decided that it would harm the child (and we've a long way to go with this, since we are still trying to persuade people that outing kids *is* dangerous)
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22815
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Bammer »

B wrote:
Bammer wrote:
Mickey wrote:It's sobering to see a Verb post on page one that's not even particularly hateful. What happened to that boy
I, too, took a stroll down memory lane to the beginning of this thread and I’m not quite sure what to make of this:
B wrote: Image
Is it your implication that I posted in support of the original tweet and not for a laugh?
I’m not quite sure.
(she/him/theirs)
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Ms Harmless »

yeah that's obviously a bad take; any name can be gender-neutral, any name can belong to anyone of any gender
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Bi_3 »

B wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
B wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:B, two posts up from yours she “wholeheartedly” endorsed puberty blockers without parental consent
Fair enough. I'm clearly not there. I've struck the two offending words.
I think parental consent needs to be questioned in a lot of cases -- for example, if a child confidentially comes out at school to a counsellor, they should not be "outed" to their parents, it's potentially very dangerous

I feel like, if young people in schools can get free condoms, menstrual products and birth control, we can ideally, eventually, move society forward so that puberty blockers are included

it hasn't been long since married trans people had to get spousal consent to transition, which is a similar control tactic

but fwiw, in the grand scheme of things that's a small point of disagreement; if B isn't quite there it's OK, the main thing is to underline that trans kids need these and they need (controlled, but not gatekept) access to them
Of your 3 examples, only 1 is a medication, and it's possibly the most used prescription med in the world.

There are mechanisms for all sorts of things that allow kids to seek treatment without parental consent.
Nothing in this debate has convinced me that the default should be to provide them without parental permission.

This is important as that threat is real. BUT. How would that work for our theoretical puberty blocker candidate 6th-grader?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Mickey »

Ms Harmless wrote:yeah that's obviously a bad take; any name can be gender-neutral, any name can belong to anyone of any gender
[Femininely] Steve
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by spike »

Image
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Ms Harmless »

Mickey wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:yeah that's obviously a bad take; any name can be gender-neutral, any name can belong to anyone of any gender
[Femininely] Steve
I'd date a lady called Steve, possibly even marry her
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13642
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by Ms Harmless »

and then I'd roast her constantly online because Steve is my dad's name
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40675
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Transgender Rights

Post by wease »

I’ve known two gals named Shane.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
Post Reply