Red Mosquito

Strat wrote:

Bammer wrote:

bodysnatcher wrote:I already paid $200 for tickets to that show, not gonna pay another $8 to see it again.

Plus the second night was way better.

I spent at least 3 songs of night 1 (including Brandi Carlisle) roaming around by the port-o-potties in Right Field trying to bum a smoke. Unsuccessful, did not see a single person smoking.

The second night was way better (no Brandi Carlisle).

You shouldn't' smoke, bammer.

I appreciate that and I think you'll be happy to know that whatever cigarette I smoked last ... prior to the 8/8/18 Pearl Jam concert ... is the last cigarette I have smoked, period.

Pretty sure, anyway.

B wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

B wrote:How do I stream nugs.net? Is that on my Roku?

You can download a web browser on roku

holy shit. this changes RM forever.

until you leave it logged in on accident and your wife or kids walk by

Chris_H_2 wrote:really wish they read "analog" over the mouth

Am I the only one who thinks buying posters for shows that didn't happen is a complete waste of money?

lowlight79 wrote:Am I the only one who thinks buying posters for shows that didn't happen is a complete waste of money?

You sure as f*ck are not.

lowlight79 wrote:Am I the only one who thinks buying posters for shows that didn't happen is a complete waste of money?

I didn't until I got locked out of the Baltimore sale. Now I agree.

With today’s technology would it really be that hard to obtain a hi-res digital image of any given tour poster and print it yourself in 18”x24” or whatever size and frame it?

lowlight79 wrote:Am I the only one who thinks buying posters for shows that didn't happen is a complete waste of money?

it is weird, but if the art is cool, its a piece of art.

Bammer wrote:

lowlight79 wrote:Am I the only one who thinks buying posters for shows that didn't happen is a complete waste of money?

You sure as f*ck are not.

They're a snapshot from a very "memorable" stretch of history.

B wrote:

lowlight79 wrote:Am I the only one who thinks buying posters for shows that didn't happen is a complete waste of money?

I didn't until I got locked out of the Baltimore sale. Now I agree.

They haven't been sold at 10C yet. Just the AP.

CopperTom wrote:

B wrote:

lowlight79 wrote:Am I the only one who thinks buying posters for shows that didn't happen is a complete waste of money?

I didn't until I got locked out of the Baltimore sale. Now I agree.

They haven't been sold at 10C yet. Just the AP.

Not sure how reliable the people posting this info are - but some are saying Baltimore might be released today through 10C. I hope to get one. Didn't have tix to it, but of all of them it's my favorite one.

Santos was specifically avoiding answering questions about Baltimore on Facebook when he posted the other posters.

B wrote:Santos was specifically avoiding answering questions about Baltimore on Facebook when he posted the other posters.

It could be as simple as the 10C is not yet in possession of the Baltimore posters.

Per Santos, Baltimore next week.

CopperTom wrote:Per Santos, Baltimore next week.

awesome. Appreciate the info!

I'm sure you all already know - but just in case - Baltimore is available now.

Not to disparage Ames Bros, but is their signature really worth a $65 upgrade to a $35 poster?

Also, never noticed this before: "POSTERS ARE SOLD 'AS-IS'. NO REFUNDS, NO EXCHANGES."

B wrote:Not to disparage Ames Bros, but is their signature really worth a $65 upgrade to a $35 poster?

I’m not seeing the example you’re referring to, but I’m pretty sure this is due to the posters being an Artist Proof. This is pretty common within the poster artist community. Generally the artist will get a certain amount of first copies of the poster from the printer (say, 200), artist inspects everything, and signs them #/200. Then others are mass produced without signatures. Basically it’s like getting posters straight from the artist’s hands.

Whether it’s worth it is up to the buyer. Usually AP buyers are larger collectors.