Red Mosquito

Is this true, Canucks?

tYrAnNy!!!

duh fuk

The only illness that exists is covid

meh, don't sell yourself short, bub.

BurtReynolds wrote:

Is this true, Canucks?

That's an incomplete clip. Are they talking about tracing? Because if you're a close contact, and you're sick, and you have no test showing otherwise, then for public health purposes, you have COVID.

I know that's a very "OH MY GOD!" moment for some of you, but welcome to Earth.

It's insane to assume that anyone who is sick and untested has covid.

BurtReynolds wrote:It's insane to assume that anyone who is sick and untested has covid.

Depends on how you get funding $$$

For public health purposes, "tracing" doesn't work

BurtReynolds wrote:It's insane to assume that anyone who is sick and untested has covid.

All things being equal, of course, you're right. But my point is that the clip you posted appears to be someone talking about an outbreak. If an unmasked, unvaccinated, close-contact to a contagious person is sick, they should absolutely be treated as a COVID case until further evidence presents itself.

verb_to_trust wrote:For public health purposes, "tracing" doesn't work

Incorrect.

B wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:It's insane to assume that anyone who is sick and untested has covid.

All things being equal, of course, you're right. But my point is that the clip you posted appears to be someone talking about an outbreak. If an unmasked, unvaccinated, close-contact to a contagious person is sick, they should absolutely be treated as a COVID case until further evidence presents itself.

Guilty until proven innocent is a good policy.

macphisto wrote:

B wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:It's insane to assume that anyone who is sick and untested has covid.

All things being equal, of course, you're right. But my point is that the clip you posted appears to be someone talking about an outbreak. If an unmasked, unvaccinated, close-contact to a contagious person is sick, they should absolutely be treated as a COVID case until further evidence presents itself.

Guilty until proven innocent is a good policy.

There's no guilt or innocence here.

B wrote:

macphisto wrote:

B wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:It's insane to assume that anyone who is sick and untested has covid.

All things being equal, of course, you're right. But my point is that the clip you posted appears to be someone talking about an outbreak. If an unmasked, unvaccinated, close-contact to a contagious person is sick, they should absolutely be treated as a COVID case until further evidence presents itself.

Guilty until proven innocent is a good policy.

There's no guilt or innocence here.

You're only fooling yourself.

B wrote:

macphisto wrote:

B wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:It's insane to assume that anyone who is sick and untested has covid.

All things being equal, of course, you're right. But my point is that the clip you posted appears to be someone talking about an outbreak. If an unmasked, unvaccinated, close-contact to a contagious person is sick, they should absolutely be treated as a COVID case until further evidence presents itself.

Guilty until proven innocent is a good policy.

There's no guilt or innocence here.

Just useless mass surveillance

It is just a clip, so I was wondering if anyone knows the full context. I'm sure our Canadian friends will clear this up when they get back to me.

verb_to_trust wrote:

B wrote:

macphisto wrote:

B wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:It's insane to assume that anyone who is sick and untested has covid.

All things being equal, of course, you're right. But my point is that the clip you posted appears to be someone talking about an outbreak. If an unmasked, unvaccinated, close-contact to a contagious person is sick, they should absolutely be treated as a COVID case until further evidence presents itself.

Guilty until proven innocent is a good policy.

There's no guilt or innocence here.

Just useless mass surveillance

nInEtEeN eIgHtY-fOuR!!!

verb_to_trust wrote:For public health purposes, "tracing" doesn't work

I probably gave Covid to 10,000 people last night for all we know.

BurtReynolds wrote:It is just a clip, so I was wondering if anyone knows the full context. I'm sure our Canadian friends will clear this up when they get back to me.

Vancouver:

Bi_3 wrote:

BurtReynolds wrote:It is just a clip, so I was wondering if anyone knows the full context. I'm sure our Canadian friends will clear this up when they get back to me.

Vancouver:

This. Better to die on a vent than live on your knees.