Re: Election 2016
Posted: Sun February 14, 2016 4:30 am
Saying something that you agree with doesn't make him reasonable. He doesn't use reason to decide what to say.
Taking a nuanced view of PP and consistently saying he plans to work with democrats instead of stonewalling them seems pretty reasonable to me.The Argonaut wrote:Saying something that you agree with doesn't make him reasonable. He doesn't use reason to decide what to say.
Did she mean to say that? Does it seem to anyone else that both parties are getting really lazy about pretending they aren't corrupt as shit?“The unpledged delegates are a separate category. The only thing available on the ballot in a primary and a caucus is the pledged delegates – those that are tied to the candidate that they are pledged to support, and they receive a proportional number of delegates going in to our convention.
“Unpledged delegates exist, really, to make sure that party leaders and elected officials don’t have to be in a position where they are running against grassroots activists,” Wasserman-Schultz explained.
“We are, as a Democratic Party, really highlight and emphasize inclusiveness and diversity at our convention, so we want to give every opportunity to grassroots activists and diverse committed Democrats to be able to participate, attend, and be a delegate at the convention. So we separate out those unpledged delegates to make sure that there isn’t competition between them,” she added.
yes i overlooked that simpler theme in my haste to extract a deeper thesis from the superbowl halftime show,McParadigm wrote:How dare rich music entertainers use their platform tofight segregationoppose warsupport abortion rightsquestion the war on terrordiscuss police brutality in a public place.
Now is not the time.
and essentially implying that voting for any of the other candidates means that Stalin winsSimple Torture wrote:Way to bring up Stalin, Dr. Ben.
lol, I literally forgot he existedBirds in Hell wrote:Poor Jeb.
he really is the worstBurtReynolds wrote:poor jeb
you're just saying that because he is a huge nerd.Dev wrote:he really is the worstBurtReynolds wrote:poor jeb
U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is "not Christian" because of his views on immigration, Pope Francis said on his way back to Rome from Mexico.
The pope said, however, he did not want to advise American Catholics on whether or not to vote for Trump.
In a freewheeling conversation with reporters on his flight back from a visit to Mexico, Francis was asked about Trump and some of his statements, such as vowing to build a wall between the United States and Mexico if he becomes president.
"A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian," Francis said in answer to a specific question about Trump's views. "This is not in the gospel."
Asked if American Catholics should vote for someone with Trump's views, Francis said:
"I am not going to get involved in that. I say only that this man is not Christian if he has said things like that. We must see if he said things in that way and in this I give the benefit of the doubt," he said.
On his last day in Mexico, Francis said a Mass on the U.S. border, where he railed against immigration policies that force many underground and into the hands of drug gangs and human smugglers.
Trump has also said he would deport millions of illegal migrants if he wins the November U.S. election. Last week he told Fox Business television that Pope Francis did not understand the Mexican border issues.
"The pope is a very political person. I think he doesn't understand the problems our country has. I don't think he understands the danger of the open border that we have with Mexico," he said.
Asked about being called a "political person", Francis said: "Thank God he said I was a politician because Aristotle defined the human person as 'animal politicus'. So at least I am a human person."
Trump has taken a more than 20-point lead over U.S. Senator Ted Cruz in the Republican race for the presidential nomination, with his campaign seeming to thrive off the endless controversies that he has generated.
I think you have explained before, but I forget... Why don't you like the Pope again? I mean, I get it with Trump, but the Pope seems like a pretty well liked guy for the most part.theplatypus wrote:Trump vs. Bergoglio. I don't know who's the bigger phony.
Which is exactly why i found their feud so amusing.theplatypus wrote:Trump vs. Bergoglio. I don't know who's the bigger phony.