Page 78 of 331

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Fri December 04, 2015 4:24 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
thank you, arod

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Fri December 04, 2015 4:43 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:thank you, arod
x2

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 3:15 am
by Kaius
Te: Chandler or Kelce?

Pick 2 flex:
Rawls (tough matchup but a lot of touches)
Evans (drop issues, but a lot of targets/high ceiling)
Langford (great matchup, but splitting with forte)
C. West (similar situation as Langford)

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 3:24 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
Kaius wrote:Te: Chandler or Kelce?

Pick 2 flex:
Rawls (tough matchup but a lot of touches)
Evans (drop issues, but a lot of targets/high ceiling)
Langford (great matchup, but splitting with forte)
C. West (similar situation as Langford)
rawls and evans i guess

kelce i guess

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 3:30 am
by Kaius
Yeah I don't feel great about the choices I have to make either. I think they're all solid plays, but I'm playing a top team this week and I need to win these last 2 games to get into the playoffs.

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 3:38 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
Kaius wrote:Yeah I don't feel great about the choices I have to make either. I think they're all solid plays, but I'm playing a top team this week and I need to win these last 2 games to get into the playoffs.
chandler may do fine, but since you have another great option in kelce if it were me i'd wait to see what chandler does in a starting role...i think he'll be solid if nothing else though

i think i'd have langford number 4 on that list, while considering west instead of evans...like you, i think rawls will get the most opportunities

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 3:58 am
by Kaius
I appreciate your time.

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 4:00 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
Kaius wrote:I appreciate your time.
anything for you, bro

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 4:20 pm
by epilogue
Kaius wrote:Te: Chandler or Kelce?

Pick 2 flex:
Rawls (tough matchup but a lot of touches)
Evans (drop issues, but a lot of targets/high ceiling)
Langford (great matchup, but splitting with forte)
C. West (similar situation as Langford)
Rawls
West
Evans
Langford

And absolutely go Kelce. This could be his biggest game of the year. Oakland seems to fucking hate defending TE's and Alex Smith loves the fuck out of feeding them.

But I'm running with Chandler this week because I don't have any other options. I don't expect him to replace Gronk or anything but I do expect end zone targets/opportunities. In my other league, I'm going Kelce all the way.

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 4:30 pm
by nyquillyn
Kelce vs. Chandler is tough, most are picking Kelce, but I'd probably pick Chandler. Alex Smith only has 12 TD passes.

Then Rawls and Evans.

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 4:48 pm
by Kaius
My gut says Chandler, but only because Tom Brady. Also, my opponent has Brady.

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 4:50 pm
by Kaius
Please post your respective fantasy records so I know who to trust. :)

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 4:54 pm
by nyquillyn
0-0 with 0 total points

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 4:55 pm
by Kaius
How many thousands have you won on FanDuel?

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 8:32 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
the vikings d are getting destroyed but thanks to special teams scoring they have 55 points for me right now...i'm going off in that league right now, and it pisses me completely off knowing i had bell and dion lewis

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 8:41 pm
by Kaius
55?! My league gives credit for return td's also, and MN has 3.

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 8:46 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
Kaius wrote:55?! My league gives credit for return td's also, and MN has 3.
3 sounds really low if they credit td's

but yeah this league has really elevated scoring...extra points for rushes, receptions, returns for certain lengths...i know the kickoff return was 101 yards but not exactly sure how many points i got for it

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 8:48 pm
by Kaius
If the defense gives up 35+ pts they're going to be in the negative unless they get sacks, picks, etc.

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 8:50 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
Kaius wrote:If the defense gives up 35+ pts they're going to be in the negative unless they get sacks, picks, etc.
i just looked at the scoring settings and i can't figure out how they have 58 now, looks more like it should be around 30, but whatevs

i should get -1 based on seattle's scoring

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Posted: Sun December 06, 2015 8:56 pm
by Kaius
In other news, I started Langford over west and Evans. Whoops. That last Kadeem Carey TD should have been Langfords but whatever.