Page 78 of 792
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun December 22, 2013 12:36 am
by numbers
Really poor form by the Orioles on the Balfour signing.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun December 22, 2013 12:36 am
by @SkitchP
numbers wrote:Really poor form by the Orioles on the Balfour signing.
Thats so Orioles though.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun December 22, 2013 12:45 am
by numbers
It really is, and so Duquette as well.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun December 22, 2013 12:45 am
by @SkitchP
numbers wrote:It really is, and so Duquette as well.
Stan Bolander would be none too pleased.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun December 22, 2013 12:53 am
by numbers
Peter Angelos would have made for a great villain on Homicide.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun December 22, 2013 1:00 am
by Chris_H_2
So what exactly was the Tigers' off-season strategy now that the guy that would have been the perfect addition to their team and made Dombrowski's moves more sensible has signed elsewhere?
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun December 22, 2013 1:07 am
by @SkitchP
Chris_H_2 wrote:So what exactly was the Tigers' off-season strategy now that the guy that would have been the perfect addition to their team and made Dombrowski's moves more sensible has signed elsewhere?
The only move that doesn't seem to fit is dealing Fister. Dumping Princes long term deal, even with no return, was great. I think Prince might actually be done. Kinsler and Davis add a lot of athleticism, and moving Miggy to 1st helps the defense tremendously. Also longer term payroll flexibility opens up the possibility of extending their window of contention. Im just not sure why they had to deal Fister to do it. I think DD must have really liked Robbie Ray.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun December 22, 2013 1:09 am
by numbers
If they end up re-signing Scherzer this offseason makes perfect sense for Detroit.
Re: MLB
Posted: Sun December 22, 2013 9:55 pm
by MadTIGERmaN
@SkitchP wrote:Chris_H_2 wrote:So what exactly was the Tigers' off-season strategy now that the guy that would have been the perfect addition to their team and made Dombrowski's moves more sensible has signed elsewhere?
The only move that doesn't seem to fit is dealing Fister. Dumping Princes long term deal, even with no return, was great. I think Prince might actually be done. Kinsler and Davis add a lot of athleticism, and moving Miggy to 1st helps the defense tremendously. Also longer term payroll flexibility opens up the possibility of extending their window of contention. Im just not sure why they had to deal Fister to do it. I think DD must have really liked Robbie Ray.
Prince has one GREAT year in Texas (this year) 2 more okay years...
I think hes gonna really come out focused this year after last season. Dude plays everyday though at that weight... I never saw him having a long career.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed December 25, 2013 4:41 am
by Norah
So now Tanaka is getting posted.
Re: MLB
Posted: Wed December 25, 2013 4:30 pm
by numbers
I sympathize with the golden eagles here. They basically got the rug pulled out from under them with this whole thing.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu January 09, 2014 3:10 am
by E.H. Ruddock
Really glad to see Frank Thomas get in, I always liked that guy. Great class going in this year.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu January 09, 2014 3:24 am
by numbers
Feel bad for Biggio. He'll most likely get in eventually, but he was a great fucking ballplayer, he should have been in before Frank Thomas.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu January 09, 2014 3:30 am
by Chris_H_2
The 10-max ballot is really, really, really stupid.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu January 09, 2014 5:41 am
by numbers
The whole process is a joke.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu January 09, 2014 5:41 am
by Norah
So there are 16 baseball writers out there who didn't think Greg? Maddux deserved a vote.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu January 09, 2014 11:03 am
by numbers
And one who thought Jacque Jones did.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu January 09, 2014 12:42 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
cutuphalfdead wrote:So there are 16 baseball writers out there who didn't think Greg? Maddux deserved a vote.
A few of them didn't vote for anyone from the steroid era. And Dan Le Betard gave his vote to deadspin.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu January 09, 2014 2:18 pm
by philpritchard
E.H. Ruddock wrote:And Dan Le Betard gave his vote to deadspin.
And, oddly enough, he had a perfectly reasonable and defensible ballot that voted for the ten best players available. It's a shame other voters can't put the same amount of thought into their ballots that random fans are willing to.
Re: MLB
Posted: Thu January 09, 2014 2:20 pm
by numbers
It should be hall of famers voting on it not writers.