Page 78 of 714

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Sat June 21, 2014 2:42 am
by epilogue
McParadigm wrote:Actually, I haven't seen Brick. But for all their problems, Looper and Brothers Bloom both grabbed me way more than any of JJ's work. There wasn't an ounce of flash bang cynicism in the way they constructed their plot or characters...and not a drop of tribble blood in the way they told their stories.
:lol:

And I haven't seen either of those. I want to and I should. Brick is the only one I've seen and it's just one giant miss, I think. Abrams has way more heart and is far more genuine than Brick.

I should check out Looper and Brothers Bloom, though, before I keep talking about this.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Sat June 21, 2014 2:43 am
by Rangi Guy
durdencommatyler wrote:
McParadigm wrote:Actually, I haven't seen Brick. But for all their problems, Looper and Brothers Bloom both grabbed me way more than any of JJ's work. There wasn't an ounce of flash bang cynicism in the way they constructed their plot or characters...and not a drop of tribble blood in the way they told their stories.
:lol:

And I haven't seen either of those. I want to and I should. Brick is the only one I've seen and it's just one giant miss, I think. Abrams has way more heart and is far more genuine than Brick.

I should check out Looper and Brothers Bloom, though, before I keep talking about this.
Looper was great!

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Sat June 21, 2014 2:43 am
by BurtReynolds
Looper is exactly the sort of Bruce Willis vehicle you would expect in late October where you go "hey that didn't suck that much. Job well done".

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Sat June 21, 2014 2:46 am
by Rangi Guy
BurtReynolds wrote:Looper is exactly the sort of Bruce Willis vehicle you would expect in late October where you go "hey that didn't suck that much. Job well done".
It was better than that....

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Sat June 21, 2014 2:47 am
by BurtReynolds
Rangi Guy wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Looper is exactly the sort of Bruce Willis vehicle you would expect in late October where you go "hey that didn't suck that much. Job well done".
It was better than that....
That ridiculous nose knocked it down a few pegs for me.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Sat June 21, 2014 2:47 am
by epilogue
Rangi Guy wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
McParadigm wrote:Actually, I haven't seen Brick. But for all their problems, Looper and Brothers Bloom both grabbed me way more than any of JJ's work. There wasn't an ounce of flash bang cynicism in the way they constructed their plot or characters...and not a drop of tribble blood in the way they told their stories.
:lol:

And I haven't seen either of those. I want to and I should. Brick is the only one I've seen and it's just one giant miss, I think. Abrams has way more heart and is far more genuine than Brick.

I should check out Looper and Brothers Bloom, though, before I keep talking about this.
Looper was great!
I tried to see it once. But it didn't go well. I got my money back. But that had nothing to do with the movie itself. I'm certainly not holding that experience against it. I really want to see Looper.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Sat June 21, 2014 2:53 am
by McParadigm
durdencommatyler wrote:Abrams has way more heart and is far more genuine than Brick.
Until I see Brick, I'm going to keep this in my pocket as a very probable "most stip posts of all time" contender.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Sat June 21, 2014 3:00 am
by epilogue
McParadigm wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Abrams has way more heart and is far more genuine than Brick.
Until I see Brick, I'm going to keep this in my pocket as a very probable "most stip posts of all time" contender.
Fair enough. But I'll stand by it until the day I die.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Sat June 21, 2014 5:06 am
by nyquillyn
Brick may not have completely worked, but it had far more ideas and style than the facsimiles JJ keeps putting on screen.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Sat June 21, 2014 6:53 am
by Dev
pretty much everything JJ has done is superior to "Looper". however, the only thing JJ did that was great is the Star Trek movies.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Sat June 21, 2014 8:41 am
by dimejinky99
Rian Johnson on Screenwriting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gux9zyFPDeA

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Sat June 21, 2014 4:30 pm
by B
You dudes missed the off ramp to the Episode VIII thread. :shake:

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Mon June 23, 2014 9:14 pm
by Strat

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Mon June 23, 2014 10:49 pm
by BurtReynolds
Kinda hurts the argument for more practical effects. They might kill the star.

http://io9.com/harrison-fords-injury-ma ... 1594838394

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Mon June 23, 2014 10:58 pm
by Strat
*6-8 weeks

Harrison Ford isn't exactly ready to laugh it up like a fuzzball just yet.
Although the "Star Wars: Episode VII" star successfully completed surgery to repair his broken leg Thursday, photos surfaced of him in a wheelchair leaving the central London hospital where the procedure was done on Saturday, reports the Daily Mail.
It's the first time Ford has been spotted since sustaining the injury on June 12.
"His surgery was successful and he will begin rehab shortly," his rep said in a statement obtained by the Daily News on June 19. "He's doing well and looks forward to returning to work."
The 71-year-old actor, who is reprising his role as Han Solo in the film, is reportedly returning to the U.S. to begin rehabilitation.
Harrison Ford seen leaving the hospital in Central London, UK following a surgery on his broken ankle on June 21. He was injured on the set of ‘Star Wars: Episode VII’ on June 12.
FAMEFLYNETUK/FAMEFLYNET PICTURES/FAMEFLYNETUK/FAMEFLYNET PICTURES
Harrison Ford seen leaving the hospital in Central London, UK following a surgery on his broken ankle on June 21. He was injured on the set of ‘Star Wars: Episode VII’ on June 12.
He may not be able to return to the movie set for six to eight weeks after he was injured at Britian's Pinewood Studios when a hydraulic door reportedly fell on him from his iconic spaceship, The Millennium Falcon.


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainmen ... z35VScuthL

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Tue June 24, 2014 12:35 am
by McParadigm
BurtReynolds wrote:Kinda hurts the argument for more practical effects. They might kill the star.

http://io9.com/harrison-fords-injury-ma ... 1594838394
When your star is a hundred, sure. But more than that...
which means the movie's either getting delayed or massively rewritten.
Perfect. Now we just need to put Mark and Carrie in reasonably dangerous situations as well, and we can get all the dead weight out of the way.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Tue June 24, 2014 12:13 pm
by B
Strat wrote:http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/harrison-ford-spotted-leaving-hospital-wheelchair-article-1.1839628
Is Han Solo really the lead? I never assumed that to be true.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu June 26, 2014 12:03 am
by epilogue
B wrote:
Strat wrote:http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/harrison-ford-spotted-leaving-hospital-wheelchair-article-1.1839628
Is Han Solo really the lead? I never assumed that to be true.
As far as I know this is unconfirmed. But if it's true it's a big plot detail, so I'm going to spoiler it for those who would rather not know anything.
Spoiler: show
"Han Solo is pretty much the main character of EPISODE VII, leading a galaxy-wide search party for Luke Skywalker."

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu June 26, 2014 12:40 am
by BurtReynolds
It makes sense from a "know-nothing corporate monolith who doesn't understand its own product" perspective.

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015)

Posted: Thu June 26, 2014 2:33 pm
by lowlight79
A friend of my had the same kind injury ford suffered. He broken the bottom part of tibia ice skating. He also needed surgery and wasn't fully healed for 3-4 months and he was 27 at the time. To tell people he will be ready in 6-8 weeks is insanity.