Red Mosquito

Lament wrote:What about a "CHUD 15" Red Sox/Expos/Nationals/Diamondbacks Frankenjersey?


Hmm...maybe I'll wear the Lament Sox jersey to the game tomorrow and be THAT guy.

that would be amazing.

We've got seven people who have been in every single tournament (chud, Skitch, phil, argo, numbers, kaius, and me) and I believe 2 others who have been in all but one (#BRL and TBAMTS). That's a pretty impressive retention rate.

Out of boredom, I have discovered I am apparently 115-107 over the course of the RM seasons (and 126-118 if you count postseason/tournament games).

So what are we doing next? The dead ball era? That draft is going to be murda.

Theoretically the next one would be the Live Ball Era (1920-1946). I worry that halfway through that draft though, we'll all just be scrambling to draft guys from baseball-reference who we'd never really head of before.

Lament wrote:Theoretically the next one would be the Live Ball Era (1920-1946). I worry that halfway through that draft though, we'll all just be scrambling to draft guys from baseball-reference who we'd never really head of before.

thats been every team other than the first 2.

Lament wrote:Theoretically the next one would be the Live Ball Era (1920-1946). I worry that halfway through that draft though, we'll all just be scrambling to draft guys from baseball-reference who we'd never really head of before.

I feel like that will start towards the end of the 2nd round.

I wouldn't have a problem with going back to beginning and doing the current era again, but, I do like the idea of doing the live ball era and then having a super tournament where we use players from all of our teams.

@SkitchP wrote:anyone want to throw in on a "lament 15" white sox jersey.

Yes

Lament wrote:What about a "CHUD 15" Red Sox/Expos/Nationals/Diamondbacks Frankenjersey?

Yes

numbers wrote:I wouldn't have a problem with going back to beginning and doing the current era again, but, I do like the idea of doing the live ball era and then having a super tournament where we use players from all of our teams.

I do want to do a Super Tournament. It's just a matter of whether or not you guys think three eras is enough. We could always do some kind of mashup. Like, we can have a five round draft of players from 1901-1946, and anyone you pick is eligible to be a part of your Super Team.

Lament wrote:

numbers wrote:I wouldn't have a problem with going back to beginning and doing the current era again, but, I do like the idea of doing the live ball era and then having a super tournament where we use players from all of our teams.

I do want to do a Super Tournament. It's just a matter of whether or not you guys think three eras is enough. We could always do some kind of mashup. Like, we can have a five round draft of players from 1901-1946, and anyone you pick is eligible to be a part of your Super Team.

I think three eras is enough, but, can we really do this without having guys like Ruth?

numbers wrote:I think three eras is enough, but, can we really do this without having guys like Ruth?

Yeah, this is kinda where I'm at too.

I definitely want to do the post-strike era again with a real 54 game season instead of the tournament style we did.

Im so happy to do no stats tomorrow, and only 2 on friday.

cutuphalfdead wrote:I definitely want to do the post-strike era again with a real 54 game season instead of the tournament style we did.

My post-strike team is sooooo terrible.

cutuphalfdead wrote:I definitely want to do the post-strike era again with a real 54 game season instead of the tournament style we did.

True, I forgot we only did a quick tournament .

Just waiting on Houston stats for games 49-54 and I'll have the entire league.

I didn't mind doing the stats like this for the league. I think it makes it a lot more fun when we know who the leaders are.

However, if you're thinking "man, chud just did the stats for a few of the slacker teams, so why not I just get lazy next time and he'll pick up the slack for me!" you should know that I was pretty much at the threshhold for what I could handle. If any more teams got lazy, I probably wouldn't have had enough time to do this.

Also, thanks to kaius for never changing his lineup. It made copy pasting his stats very, very easy.

cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't mind doing the stats like this for the league. I think it makes it a lot more fun when we know who the leaders are.

However, if you're thinking "man, chud just did the stats for a few of the slacker teams, so why not I just get lazy next time and he'll pick up the slack for me!" you should know that I was pretty much at the threshhold for what I could handle. If any more teams got lazy, I probably wouldn't have had enough time to do this.

Also, thanks to kaius for never changing his lineup. It made copy pasting his stats very, very easy.

i always change mine :/

No, chud. Thank you.

@SkitchP wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't mind doing the stats like this for the league. I think it makes it a lot more fun when we know who the leaders are.

However, if you're thinking "man, chud just did the stats for a few of the slacker teams, so why not I just get lazy next time and he'll pick up the slack for me!" you should know that I was pretty much at the threshhold for what I could handle. If any more teams got lazy, I probably wouldn't have had enough time to do this.

Also, thanks to kaius for never changing his lineup. It made copy pasting his stats very, very easy.

i always change mine :/

that's fine, you keep your own stats so you have to deal with that not me