Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Posted: Mon September 16, 2013 12:33 pm
I'm talking No Code-Riot Act basically, but Yield is a bit of an outlier in that is does have songs which focus a lot on melody (at least the ones I like/love).
I'm not saying craft don't count per se, I'm saying that when two sets of songs, in the way they sound, express very different emotions, I don't see the point of saying the songwriting is similar. Yes, they're also using guitars and drums and overall fall under the rock umbrella BUT at the end of the day they end up being very different vehicles for emotions and that's going to result in very different reactions from the listener, regardless of whether both sets of songs have in common the use of verses and choruses and melodies.harmless wrote:Because song craft, if it's conscious enough, can work to achieve those feelings and emotions. You don't just accidentally come up with a song with feeling... not often, anyway.
Oh, right, yes and I totally agree. There's just *something* that makes these songs not like the old stuff; even if they're consciously trying to write the old stuff, they won't.Heathen wrote:I'm not saying craft don't count per se, I'm saying that when two sets of songs, in the way they sound, express very different emotions, I don't see the point of saying the songwriting is similar. Yes, they're also using guitars and drums and overall fall under the rock umbrella BUT at the end of the day they end up being very different vehicles for emotions and that's going to result in very different reactions from the listener, regardless of whether both sets of songs have in common the use of verses and choruses and melodies.harmless wrote:Because song craft, if it's conscious enough, can work to achieve those feelings and emotions. You don't just accidentally come up with a song with feeling... not often, anyway.
HardTI wrote:Well, I finally "got" Getaway. Wow that song is fucking intense. "Now make your getaway, hey!" at 2:14, where he goes up an octave, just kicks the song into overdrive. I love little stuff like that. Especially when it doesn't feel forced (like the laugh in Life Wasted or do some degree the breath at the end of The End).
haha I get why it would. It's kind of shrill and I usually hate that sound. It just happens to work for me here (really fucking well, actually).stupidmop wrote:HardTI wrote:Well, I finally "got" Getaway. Wow that song is fucking intense. "Now make your getaway, hey!" at 2:14, where he goes up an octave, just kicks the song into overdrive. I love little stuff like that. Especially when it doesn't feel forced (like the laugh in Life Wasted or do some degree the breath at the end of The End).That part really bugs me and i don't know why.
harmless wrote:Because song craft, if it's conscious enough, can work to achieve those feelings and emotions. You don't just accidentally come up with a song with feeling... not often, anyway.
You have to have the initial spark of inspiration, sure, I'm not denying that. But a song doesn't really just fall into your lap. If it does, you get Backspacer.Django Butterworth wrote:harmless wrote:Because song craft, if it's conscious enough, can work to achieve those feelings and emotions. You don't just accidentally come up with a song with feeling... not often, anyway.
Actually more often than not it is the way a song happens.
If you try and sit down and write something, 90% of the time you come up with nothing.
I think we have to give Backspacer more credit than that even if some of us (myself included) are not big fans of it. I still would like to think that most elements of that record were a conscious decision as opposed to just lazy song writing.harmless wrote:You have to have the initial spark of inspiration, sure, I'm not denying that. But a song doesn't really just fall into your lap. If it does, you get Backspacer.Django Butterworth wrote:harmless wrote:Because song craft, if it's conscious enough, can work to achieve those feelings and emotions. You don't just accidentally come up with a song with feeling... not often, anyway.
Actually more often than not it is the way a song happens.
If you try and sit down and write something, 90% of the time you come up with nothing.
Oh I agree, there was intention. I just think that the deliberate intention was to have fewer intentions, throw it all into a pot and see what came out, but not to spend much time on it. That seems to have been a very conscious decision for the band, and something they hadn't done before.HardTI wrote:I think we have to give Backspacer more credit than that even if some of us (myself included) are not big fans of it. I still would like to think that most elements of that record were a conscious decision as opposed to just lazy song writing.harmless wrote:You have to have the initial spark of inspiration, sure, I'm not denying that. But a song doesn't really just fall into your lap. If it does, you get Backspacer.Django Butterworth wrote:harmless wrote:Because song craft, if it's conscious enough, can work to achieve those feelings and emotions. You don't just accidentally come up with a song with feeling... not often, anyway.
Actually more often than not it is the way a song happens.
If you try and sit down and write something, 90% of the time you come up with nothing.
YES.harmless wrote:People need to stop equating "poppy" with "bad" just because they're embarrassed by the word "pop". That's juvenile. When I say "poppy" I don't mean Britney Spears, I mean something with a generally broader, more commercial appeal. Do you think "pop music" only started when they invented computers? The Beatles were a pop band.
"Toxic" is a cracker of a song.harmless wrote:People need to stop equating "poppy" with "bad" just because they're embarrassed by the word "pop". That's juvenile. When I say "poppy" I don't mean Britney Spears, I mean something with a generally broader, more commercial appeal. Do you think "pop music" only started when they invented computers? The Beatles were a pop band.