Re: College Football
Posted: Sun November 20, 2016 5:05 am
Not reallyBammer wrote:So this is like getting kinda a little bit interesting now.
Not reallyBammer wrote:So this is like getting kinda a little bit interesting now.
You nervous at all for the Apple Cup? Wazzu isn't a pushover anymore either, and it's in Pullman. It's a shame that this game is on Friday and the obvious huge UM/tOSU game is on Saturday, otherwise that would finally give College Gameday a great excuse to go to the Palouse.Bammer wrote:So this is like getting kinda a little bit interesting now.
I know how you feel about them, but they aren't lowly talent-wise, and weird shit happens in in-state rivalry games. I think UW wins but in the immortal words of Lee Corso, "closer than the experts think".Bammer wrote:If we can't beat the lowly Cougs then we deserve the Alamo Bowl or whatever.
Not nervous.
I was kidding. I think the line is 6 points. The Apple Cup, like many rivalry games, can be very unpredictable.Green Habit wrote:I know how you feel about them, but they aren't lowly talent-wise, and weird shit happens in in-state rivalry games. I think UW wins but in the immortal words of Lee Corso, "closer than the experts think".Bammer wrote:If we can't beat the lowly Cougs then we deserve the Alamo Bowl or whatever.
Not nervous.
I hope Ryan Leaf bricks on your front door step.Bammer wrote:The Apple Cup wasn't over at halftime today. It wasn't over when the teams stepped on the field. It wasn't over when the Huskies got off the bus.
It was over when Washington State College had the audacity to change its name to Washington State University. They will never amount to anything. Ever.
He's in jailverb_to_trust wrote:I hope Ryan Leaf bricks on your front door step.Bammer wrote:The Apple Cup wasn't over at halftime today. It wasn't over when the teams stepped on the field. It wasn't over when the Huskies got off the bus.
It was over when Washington State College had the audacity to change its name to Washington State University. They will never amount to anything. Ever.
Honestly, fell asleep in the third quarter and didn't wake up until after the game had ended. Fortunately I recorded the rest of it. Dealing with a five day old complicates things.Green Habit wrote:Congrats on the hard earned win, B and Joesanity.
It would help if college games didn't last four hours. When did that start happening?Joesanity wrote:Honestly, fell asleep in the third quarter and didn't wake up until after the game had ended. Fortunately I recorded the rest of it. Dealing with a five day old complicates things.Green Habit wrote:Congrats on the hard earned win, B and Joesanity.
Too many reviews.verb_to_trust wrote:It would help if college games didn't last four hours. When did that start happening?Joesanity wrote:Honestly, fell asleep in the third quarter and didn't wake up until after the game had ended. Fortunately I recorded the rest of it. Dealing with a five day old complicates things.Green Habit wrote:Congrats on the hard earned win, B and Joesanity.
And hurry up offenses. College ball really needs to explore a running clock after first downs.Joesanity wrote:Too many reviews.verb_to_trust wrote:It would help if college games didn't last four hours. When did that start happening?Joesanity wrote:Honestly, fell asleep in the third quarter and didn't wake up until after the game had ended. Fortunately I recorded the rest of it. Dealing with a five day old complicates things.Green Habit wrote:Congrats on the hard earned win, B and Joesanity.
Yep. Would be good for the game in several ways. Comebacks are too easy in college.And hurry up offenses. College ball really needs to explore a running clock after first downs.
Maybe do a running clock for most of the games but switch to the current model with 2 minutes left in each half. Sort of like a college 2 minute warning.Orpheus wrote:Yep. Would be good for the game in several ways. Comebacks are too easy in college.And hurry up offenses. College ball really needs to explore a running clock after first downs.
What does that have to do with the conference as a whole? They have 4 teams in the top 8, 3 of which could legitimately make the playoffs.E.H. Ruddock wrote:It is really irritating to hear everyone say that the B1G Ten is easily the best conference in college football this year, yet most likely their conference champion won't be in the playoffs. :/
idk I'm bored at work todayChris_H_2 wrote:What does that have to do with the conference as a whole? They have 4 teams in the top 8, 3 of which could legitimately make the playoffs.E.H. Ruddock wrote:It is really irritating to hear everyone say that the B1G Ten is easily the best conference in college football this year, yet most likely their conference champion won't be in the playoffs. :/