Red Mosquito

surfndestroy wrote:

spike wrote:

surfndestroy wrote:

spike wrote:

Just how badly does Biden want Trump to be president come 2024?

Sweet take bro.

Ignoring political ramifications in the name of public health is pretty refreshing.

The US is out of step with pretty much the whole world when it comes to kids and Covid. You can continue your sweet bro take thinking the US are leaders and the world is wrong all the way to Trump II, the dynasty years.

spike wrote:

macphisto wrote:

spike wrote:

macphisto wrote:

spike wrote:

macphisto wrote:Of course not.

spike wrote:

macphisto wrote:

spike wrote:

Did you read the article?

Bammer wrote:

spike wrote:

macphisto wrote:

spike wrote:

Did you read the article?

Bro if whatever it is can wait 2 months it’s obviously not that big of a deal

spike wrote:

Bammer wrote:

spike wrote:

macphisto wrote:

spike wrote:

Did you read the article?

Bro if whatever it is can wait 2 months it’s obviously not that big of a deal

it's a balancing act. hastening vaccinations while not completely fucking companies and the people that work for them.

Bammer wrote:

spike wrote:

Bammer wrote:

spike wrote:

macphisto wrote:

spike wrote:

Did you read the article?

Bro if whatever it is can wait 2 months it’s obviously not that big of a deal

it's a balancing act. hastening vaccinations while not completely fucking companies and the people that work for them.

Oh do all 100 employees at the company work inside a 6’ radius with each other?

spike wrote:

Bammer wrote:

spike wrote:

macphisto wrote:

spike wrote:

Did you read the article?

Bro if whatever it is can wait 2 months it’s obviously not that big of a deal

it's a balancing act. hastening vaccinations while not completely fucking companies and the people that work for them.

macphisto wrote:

spike wrote:

Bammer wrote:

spike wrote:

macphisto wrote:

spike wrote:

Did you read the article?

Bro if whatever it is can wait 2 months it’s obviously not that big of a deal

it's a balancing act. hastening vaccinations while not completely fucking companies and the people that work for them.

Well, as long as it’s just kinda fucking people and not completely fucking them, I’m good with it.

Bammer wrote:I’m no history buff, but it’s hard to imagine we’ve had a worse back to back run of presidents than Trump and Biden. Am I wrong?

Green Habit wrote:

Bammer wrote:I’m no history buff, but it’s hard to imagine we’ve had a worse back to back run of presidents than Trump and Biden. Am I wrong?

Fillmore/Pierce/Buchanan, pick whichever of the pairings you want there.

spike wrote:Some more encouraging news on the therapeutic front.

Now, nearly nine months after mass vaccination implementation, it is not only reasonable to expect, but mandatory from a risk analysis principle, to recalculate the risk of disease to individuals. We know that vaccines almost completely eliminate the chance of dying or being hospitalized from COVID-19. We also know that transmission of the virus is greatly reduced in vaccinated individuals who do become infected. More importantly, we know over 80% of Californians age 12 and over have been vaccinated with at least one dose. The number of individuals with natural immunity brings the percent immunized even higher.

Most California counties, especially Contra Costa, San Francisco and Alameda, have achieved the trifecta of risk reduction scenarios: probability of infection has been reduced, severity of disease has been reduced and a highly effective mitigation is in place — vaccination. Each county’s own COVID-19 data prove this to be true; San Francisco, with nearly 900,000 residents, has a seven-day rolling average of 53 positive cases per day and no deaths as of Oct. 20.

Yet public health officials in these and other counties have abandoned scientific reasoning, layering mitigation upon mitigation for no justifiable reason. The prevailing logic appears to be that it is unacceptable for even a single person to contract the virus — an unrealistic and untenable position.

Risk mitigations incur real costs and often have unintended consequence. The cost of shuttering restaurants like In-N-Out are immense — from lost jobs and revenue to the business and the state. Perhaps a greater consequence is the loss of public confidence in California’s public health institutions.