Page 80 of 169

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 1:19 am
by verb_to_trust
dimejinky99 wrote:I love the song but im traumatised as to why apart from the video performance, they haven't managed to nail it live
Its because even modern Pearl Jam isn't comfortable playing that cheese.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 1:22 am
by dimejinky99
I'd rather a failed attempt at breaking new ground than an embarrassing attempt to capture former glory.

I like sirens a Lot.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 1:25 am
by William Bloke
stip wrote:
Varis wrote:I'm kinda onboard with a lot of stip's points here but there is no way that I want people to not post what they think, regardless of their opinion. Shit, disagreeing is half the fun.

I don't feel that there is particular bullying of new posters, well, no more than the bullying of old posters, but I can see that it would take a degree of...effort perhaps to hang in there and keep on posting if you were a more pit-esque PJ fan. But in the end if you did stick around you're opinion would be just as worthwhile and valuable as anyone else's.

I don't agree with everyone in this thread, of course I don't. I still value the posts and enjoy reading them and either nodding my head or chuckling in amazement. Whatever - like platy said above, it's all just stupid shit and shouldn't be taken too seriously.

I said before that I really haven't got that much emotionally invested in PJ, and I don't. I still like the band and their music though. Its the posters and cheap thrills that keep me coming back to RM.
no one, to my knowledge, has ever said anything to the contrary
Yeah, I was skimming through the thread and took this:
stip wrote:Or the people who dont' care about pearl jam could refrain from trashing pearl jam every opportunity they get, and participate in discussions that pertain to the parts of the band that they like, or just jump in when they have something worthwhile to say about the things that they don't like. There's that.
to imply: "Only post nice things about PJ" when in re-reading it you weren't saying exactly that. Although I get the impression that some (very few) wouldn't mind this fan board doing just that...

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 1:32 am
by dimejinky99
Nobody wants that. But the omnipresent ripping or criticism about the band is just as boring to read. He it about any topic. Sound quality of boots, financial motivations/changing of positions, and fall off of quality of output/live shows.
Gets a bit much.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 1:34 am
by Tuolumne
McParadigm wrote:All joking aside, part of it for me is this:

My mother heads a local chapter of the parrot head club (they have chapters....chapters). My uncle has been a level XII kiss fan since before I was born. So I've seen a lot of how these fanbases talk and think. And I'm not exaggerating in the least to say I can find zero difference between the unquestioning worship and ridiculous praise they heap upon their respective heroes and the stuff that often defines the PJ community (well, there is less melodramatic weeping shit there, so maybe they are one up on us). But oftentimes, you could just swap out a few names and titles and leave entire conversations intact, transplanting them verbatim from one group to the next.

I like that there's a portion of Pearl Jam's fanbase that isn't just blindly along for the ride. It makes me respect the band a little more to have cultivated that unwillingness to compromise. I find no value in the alternative...it has less of a sense of humor, less inherent optimism about the potential of music or art, and it's realllllllly out of touch sometimes.

I once listened to a Springsteen fan basically say outright that Springsteen had invented the backbeat. And all the Springsteen clubbers around them nodded and agreed, because no one was around to laugh about it.
The funny thing is, I sometimes see RM as the reverse mirror image of that scenario. A lot of like-minded people sort of jerking themselves off about how clearly the band is over the hill. Between this and the Pit, "there ain't gonna be a middle anymore..."

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 1:36 am
by dimejinky99
The 'fuge was kind of middle ground.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 1:38 am
by McParadigm
I only jerk off to the Ed art thread, actually.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 1:43 am
by dimejinky99
See this one McP? Ed as Ron Jeremy:)
Image

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 1:59 am
by verb_to_trust
Is that Ed's trophy wife?

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 2:01 am
by dimejinky99
It's really not that's the odd thing.
I got this off FB, one of those pj fan groups. I think the artist is the girl in the pic. Scary as that sounds.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 2:08 am
by William Bloke
dimejinky99 wrote:It's really not that's the odd thing.
I got this off FB, one of those pj fan groups. I think the artist is the girl in the pic. Scary as that sounds.
Oh dear God.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 3:10 am
by IlluminEddie
Huell’s post a million pages back on the salesforce.com thing was awesome and dead-on accurate.

And in other news…


Stip remains a complete, unabashed, fan-boy to the most extreme possible. Here’s some of my favorites from his ridiculous posts on this one issue (salesforce):

stip wrote: in fairness, Eddie has said that about himself. So it's hard to blame him.
stip wrote: The haves/have not distinction is an ideological one about where your sympathies lie:
stip wrote:from the wikipedia page of the company ...
(stip then goes on to try to explain why salesforce is a good company worthy of Ed, which was hysterical)
stip wrote:The interesting thing about some of these posts is the way they approach an almost 'stalking my ex' level of creepy intensity.

Which, in a way, is exactly what they are.
Probably my favorite. I know other posters asked stip to look in the mirror, but why ask someone so deluded to do something like that? Let him continue. This is awesome.

stip wrote: where is the hypocrisy? What 'principle' have they abandoned?
:haha:

stip wrote: he said as he was playing in a building named after a corporation.
stip wrote: This fight is over. It was lost in a big way. I don't expect him to keep holding water for it.
Plus someone has to speak out against the RM hive mind

stip wrote: How do other artists confronting the same industry shifts see pearl jam? You don't hear many musicians criticizing them. That seems significant
Newsflash, stip. I'm a PJ fan, and even I'd admit... no one is talking about Pearl Jam at all. So, that's probably why you aren't hearing this. No one, outside of places like this, cares. Not sure anyone really cares here anymore either...
stip wrote:

I'd vow to stop posting in this thread, but no one would believe me, including myself.
************

When stip doesn't get the conversation to turn away from the laughter at Ed and PJ, he gets extra frustrated:
stip wrote:I think that's basically what RM (or pearl jam chat, anyway) has become. There are exceptions, but they're exceptions rather than the rule. If I wasn't already invested in this place and most of the people in it there is no way I would have started posting here. It took years of work from a lot of people to turn this into a really intelligent forum. And it's a shame that this is where it's ended up.
Awww.... stip...

then he goes into another good one:

stip wrote: Or the people who dont' care about pearl jam could refrain from trashing pearl jam every opportunity they get, and participate in discussions that pertain to the parts of the band that they like, or just jump in when they have something worthwhile to say about the things that they don't like. There's that.

And I'll end with the best of all...
stip wrote: Illumineddie could explain it all to you.

Don’t have to, stip… they are all catching on themselves.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 3:13 am
by dimejinky99
I wanna hire this guy to be my campaign manager

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 3:14 am
by Norah
what are you running for?

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 3:15 am
by dimejinky99
Oh I'm not. Just if I ever was. Might go for city councillor. The seem to elect nothing but clowns and the corrupt. Plus it pays well and is pensionable.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 3:17 am
by William Bloke
I really don't see that stip gets particularly "frustrated" at all. To me he just joins in the conversation and posts his own opinion of things, usually in a quite considered and reasonable manner. Considering the shit he gets I think he does exceedingly well to be honest.

His taste in PJ tunes though, now that's a total other thing...

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 3:19 am
by dimejinky99
Stip is often the only voice of reason.
He doesn't like no code though.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 3:20 am
by Iholdthepain
This place is funny... like a drought... All it takes is a tiny spark, and then sit back to watch the flames spread...

Keep RM as it is... Too much gold :-)

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 3:22 am
by William Bloke
Iholdthepain wrote:This place is funny... like a drought... All it takes is a tiny spark, and then sit back to watch the flames spread...

Keep RM as it is... Too much gold :-)
Boring Tuesday morning at work here.

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Posted: Tue March 25, 2014 3:23 am
by BurtReynolds
yay illumineddie is here! this should be good for another ten pages of nonsense.