Red Mosquito

I'm not sure if Bi_3 or tree_ is the most adept at totally missing the point. But I think it's important to point out that both have an ( _ ) in their usernames. That can't be a coincidence.

durdencommatyler wrote:I'm not sure if Bi_3 or tree_ is the most adept at totally missing the point. But I think it's important to point out that both have an ( _ ) in their usernames. That can't be a coincidence.

You cannot underscore this point enough.

durdencommatyler wrote:I'm not sure if Bi_3 or tree_ is the most adept at totally missing the point. But I think it's important to point out that both have an ( _ ) in their usernames. That can't be a coincidence.

ITT: We hate on progressives

Bi_3 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I'm not sure if Bi_3 or tree_ is the most adept at totally missing the point. But I think it's important to point out that both have an ( _ ) in their usernames. That can't be a coincidence.

ITT: We hate on progressives

I'll take this as a warning that you've reported my post. Noted.

bi_ is just willfully ignoring the point in favor of making a (not) funny post at the expense of successful and well-intentioned women in power and the board is all the worse for it. Shame.

washing machine wrote:bi_ is just willfully ignoring the point in favor of making a (not) funny post at the expense of successful and well-intentioned women in power and the board is all the worse for it. Shame.

What point is that? That Trump is a racist troll who is completely unfit to run the nation? No shit. That his party is full of cowards comprising what should the most fundamental value of America? Obviously. Their harassment by the Cheeto doesn’t make policy proposed “the squad” more or less valid. Their intersections don’t make their policy positions more or less valid. Their repeated chanting of “justice” and “equality” doesn’t make their proposals any better or worse either. Like art must be separated from the artist, ideas must be separated from the thinker and evaluated on their merit alone and their ideas are awful. So as we continue to bash every piece of dribble that comes from their mouths, please realize that it’s not an endorsement of the red team’s pathetic performance over the last 10 years or their inability to stand up to a bully.

Bi_3 wrote:

washing machine wrote:bi_ is just willfully ignoring the point in favor of making a (not) funny post at the expense of successful and well-intentioned women in power and the board is all the worse for it. Shame.

What point is that? That Trump is a racist troll who is completely unfit to run the nation? No shit. That his party is full of cowards comprising what should the most fundamental value of America? Obviously. Their harassment by the Cheeto doesn’t make policy proposed “the squad” more or less valid. Their intersections don’t make their policy positions more or less valid. Their repeated chanting of “justice” and “equality” doesn’t make their proposals any better or worse either. Like art must be separated from the artist, ideas must be separated from the thinker and evaluated on their merit alone and their ideas are awful. So as we continue to bash every piece of dribble that comes from their mouths, please realize that it’s not an endorsement of the red team’s pathetic performance over the last 10 years or their inability to stand up to a bully.

I was really just making a generic RM post in response to a take down of the squad.

Art is not separated from the artist though.

washing machine wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

washing machine wrote:bi_ is just willfully ignoring the point in favor of making a (not) funny post at the expense of successful and well-intentioned women in power and the board is all the worse for it. Shame.

What point is that? That Trump is a racist troll who is completely unfit to run the nation? No shit. That his party is full of cowards comprising what should the most fundamental value of America? Obviously. Their harassment by the Cheeto doesn’t make policy proposed “the squad” more or less valid. Their intersections don’t make their policy positions more or less valid. Their repeated chanting of “justice” and “equality” doesn’t make their proposals any better or worse either. Like art must be separated from the artist, ideas must be separated from the thinker and evaluated on their merit alone and their ideas are awful. So as we continue to bash every piece of dribble that comes from their mouths, please realize that it’s not an endorsement of the red team’s pathetic performance over the last 10 years or their inability to stand up to a bully.

I was really just making a generic RM post in response to a take down of the squad.

durdencommatyler wrote:

washing machine wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

washing machine wrote:bi_ is just willfully ignoring the point in favor of making a (not) funny post at the expense of successful and well-intentioned women in power and the board is all the worse for it. Shame.

What point is that? That Trump is a racist troll who is completely unfit to run the nation? No shit. That his party is full of cowards comprising what should the most fundamental value of America? Obviously. Their harassment by the Cheeto doesn’t make policy proposed “the squad” more or less valid. Their intersections don’t make their policy positions more or less valid. Their repeated chanting of “justice” and “equality” doesn’t make their proposals any better or worse either. Like art must be separated from the artist, ideas must be separated from the thinker and evaluated on their merit alone and their ideas are awful. So as we continue to bash every piece of dribble that comes from their mouths, please realize that it’s not an endorsement of the red team’s pathetic performance over the last 10 years or their inability to stand up to a bully.

I was really just making a generic RM post in response to a take down of the squad.

Someone had to say it. I stepped up to the plate.

washing machine wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

washing machine wrote:

Bi_3 wrote:

washing machine wrote:bi_ is just willfully ignoring the point in favor of making a (not) funny post at the expense of successful and well-intentioned women in power and the board is all the worse for it. Shame.

What point is that? That Trump is a racist troll who is completely unfit to run the nation? No shit. That his party is full of cowards comprising what should the most fundamental value of America? Obviously. Their harassment by the Cheeto doesn’t make policy proposed “the squad” more or less valid. Their intersections don’t make their policy positions more or less valid. Their repeated chanting of “justice” and “equality” doesn’t make their proposals any better or worse either. Like art must be separated from the artist, ideas must be separated from the thinker and evaluated on their merit alone and their ideas are awful. So as we continue to bash every piece of dribble that comes from their mouths, please realize that it’s not an endorsement of the red team’s pathetic performance over the last 10 years or their inability to stand up to a bully.

I was really just making a generic RM post in response to a take down of the squad.

Someone had to say it. I stepped up to the plate.

"If you stand for nothing, Burr, what'll you fall for... ?"

Bi_3 is Bill Kristol confirmed. Or maybe George Will.

McParadigm wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

While you were looking, did you find a single instance of a Republican in office condemning Trump’s racist tweet directly? In the seven hours it’s been up? Anyone demanding that he retract the statement? Or address it in someway? Did you in fact find anyone in the party infrastructure saying anything at all?

23 hours now.

Some folks speaking up, now. Mitt Romney’s deflection was on-brand hilarious for its cowardice though.

It shouldn't have surprised me, but somehow it did.

McParadigm wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

McParadigm wrote:

McParadigm wrote:Republicans sure fucked up by gesticulating and screaming for decades about how an endless series of popular ideas related to healthcare, food stamps, social security, and wealth taxes were all socialism. It was a quick win in the moment, but they systematically destroyed both the public understanding and the negative connotations of the word.

Remember when a subset of conservative media accused JOHN BOEHNER of being socialist? Ahh. We’ve had such good times together.

lol

lol

Mitch out there this morning calling DC and Puerto Rico statehood “full blown socialism”

Its a good thing conservatives are so honest and responsible with how they use “socialism” as an attack, otherwise the public might get confused as to what it means.

http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... 7#p1380997

Seriously considering reparations in a presidential debate doesn't sound like a winning strategy, but hey, it's clearly the right that's moved away from the center.

I dont think even we could handle a serious debate about reparations.

Now is not the time to discuss reparations

verb_to_trust wrote:Now is not the time to discuss reparations

when is?

durdencommatyler wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:Now is not the time to discuss reparations

when is?

70 years ago

Bi_3 wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

verb_to_trust wrote:Now is not the time to discuss reparations

when is?

70 years ago