Re: Kansas City Chiefs
Posted: Sun February 07, 2021 9:26 pm
Does96583UP wrote:KC is super dynamic but just so good it’s almost boring to watch
kinda like the 90s Bulls - you get sick of them constantly winning
Not
Compute
Does96583UP wrote:KC is super dynamic but just so good it’s almost boring to watch
kinda like the 90s Bulls - you get sick of them constantly winning

elliseamos wrote:This seems to be playing out exactly like Seattle where they won one year, lost the next year to Brady, then figured their qb would be fine with no online for the next 7 seasons until said qb demanded a trade.
Which one of Hill or Kelce will play the role of Beast Mode?epilogue wrote:elliseamos wrote:This seems to be playing out exactly like Seattle where they won one year, lost the next year to Brady, then figured their qb would be fine with no online for the next 7 seasons until said qb demanded a trade.![]()
I think this one plays out just a little differently. But I guess time will tell.
Ha!elliseamos wrote:Which one of Hill or Kelce will play the role of Beast Mode?epilogue wrote:elliseamos wrote:This seems to be playing out exactly like Seattle where they won one year, lost the next year to Brady, then figured their qb would be fine with no online for the next 7 seasons until said qb demanded a trade.![]()
I think this one plays out just a little differently. But I guess time will tell.
Ok yeah I think that makes sense. Risk paying now, non-refundable, guy gets hurt or whatever and keeps the money.96583UP wrote:i think it has more to do with whether the club is willing to do it - i.e. pay the guy in a lump sum up front
cash flow
i don't know why a player would resist - maybe bc their agent gets a cut so it's a net loss after transaction feesBammer wrote:Ok yeah I think that makes sense. Risk paying now, non-refundable, guy gets hurt or whatever and keeps the money.96583UP wrote:i think it has more to do with whether the club is willing to do it - i.e. pay the guy in a lump sum up front
cash flow
Why would the player ever resist doing this?
Why do they make it sound like the player is helping the team by doing this?
I mean, they praise the player for doing it. Like he’s a martyr or something.96583UP wrote:i don't know why a player would resist - maybe bc their agent gets a cut so it's a net loss after transaction feesBammer wrote:Ok yeah I think that makes sense. Risk paying now, non-refundable, guy gets hurt or whatever and keeps the money.96583UP wrote:i think it has more to do with whether the club is willing to do it - i.e. pay the guy in a lump sum up front
cash flow
Why would the player ever resist doing this?
Why do they make it sound like the player is helping the team by doing this?
they are helping the team bc it allows them to manage the salary cap better
to hire more players to get injured right before the superbowl so pat mahomes can play with an injured toe behind britt reid at LT