Page 9 of 156
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 4:55 pm
by LoathedVermin72
Mine wrote:Simple Torture wrote:Mine wrote:Was concern expressed about trans people, using bathrooms different than what their birth certificates would suggest, by people in relevant numbers? I can't think of any instance when that happened to a degree that would demand laws to change.
I think it has everything to do with what electro mentioned above (gay marriage being legalized) and with Caitlyn Jenner's visibility--no, really. I think most of the people who write and support these laws and policies basically didn't believe transgendered people existed, that they were just some urban myth or something that existed in a 4-block area of NYC. Then, someone who's on an extremely popular reality show (and a successful athlete, a national hero basically) goes through a very public transition (check out the 2nd post in this thread where I talked about this a year ago), and suddenly people start talking bathroom bills and public safety and the menace of men in dresses in women's locker rooms. I definitely think the two things are connected.
Jenner before transitioning was more of a Kardashian than a national hero as far as i can tell which doesn't really help the trans community as don't a lot of things around and about her.
I don't think Jenner transitioning had much of an effect on all of this in the sense that it hardly brought anything out of obscurity. For example the Amazon show Transparent pre dated Jenner's Sawyer interview and it attracted a lot of attention.
At least in the US, I definitely felt trans visibility explode after Jenner's transition.
Transparent is a relatively small and esoteric series available only via Amazon streaming. It has an audience, but it was never creating a national dialogue. Jenner is about as visible and mainstream a public figure as there can be, and this was a massive media whirlwind.
No one is saying it wasn't an issue before, but it became a huge national talking point after Jenner. As ST mentioned, there wasn't much in the way of rhetoric-driven legal brouhaha about it before.
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 5:10 pm
by Mine
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Mine wrote:Simple Torture wrote:Mine wrote:Was concern expressed about trans people, using bathrooms different than what their birth certificates would suggest, by people in relevant numbers? I can't think of any instance when that happened to a degree that would demand laws to change.
I think it has everything to do with what electro mentioned above (gay marriage being legalized) and with Caitlyn Jenner's visibility--no, really. I think most of the people who write and support these laws and policies basically didn't believe transgendered people existed, that they were just some urban myth or something that existed in a 4-block area of NYC. Then, someone who's on an extremely popular reality show (and a successful athlete, a national hero basically) goes through a very public transition (check out the 2nd post in this thread where I talked about this a year ago), and suddenly people start talking bathroom bills and public safety and the menace of men in dresses in women's locker rooms. I definitely think the two things are connected.
Jenner before transitioning was more of a Kardashian than a national hero as far as i can tell which doesn't really help the trans community as don't a lot of things around and about her.
I don't think Jenner transitioning had much of an effect on all of this in the sense that it hardly brought anything out of obscurity. For example the Amazon show Transparent pre dated Jenner's Sawyer interview and it attracted a lot of attention.
At least in the US, I definitely felt trans visibility explode after Jenner's transition.
Transparent is a relatively small and esoteric series available only via Amazon streaming. It has an audience, but it was never creating a national dialogue. Jenner is about as visible and mainstream a public figure as there can be, and this was a massive media whirlwind.
No one is saying it wasn't an issue before, but it became a huge national talking point after Jenner. As ST mentioned, there wasn't much in the way of rhetoric-driven legal brouhaha about it before.
As obscure as the show is it did win Golden globe and Emmy awards which causes headlines on it's own.
I agree that Jenner transitioning caused trans visibility to increase considerably but it's not unprecedented. Think of Cher's daughter for example. I think there was a reality show there too.
I actually think Caitlyn Jenner transitioned that late in life was because she (and probably her pr people) thought the general climate would allow for the very public transition to be accepted as well as it was, which may not have been the case decades ago.
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 5:43 pm
by Simple Torture
Mine wrote:
Jenner before transitioning was more of a Kardashian than a national hero as far as i can tell which doesn't really help the trans community as don't a lot of things around and about her.
Certainly lots of times had passed, but there were still plenty of people around who remembered the 1974 Olympics. Her win that year (competing as "Bruce" and as a man, of course; despite how impassioned I get about these topics, I still sometimes slip up and/or am not sure whether or not some people are fine with being referred to as "he/him" before their transition) had the same tenor as the 1980 US Men's hockey team--i.e., rah rah, we beat the Soviets, USA #1! It was a big deal.
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 5:48 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
If everyone would just use the bathroom at home like they are supposed to this wouldn't even be an issue for either side.
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 6:44 pm
by Mine
Simple Torture wrote:Mine wrote:
Jenner before transitioning was more of a Kardashian than a national hero as far as i can tell which doesn't really help the trans community as don't a lot of things around and about her.
Certainly lots of times had passed, but there were still plenty of people around who remembered the 1974 Olympics. Her win that year (competing as "Bruce" and as a man, of course; despite how impassioned I get about these topics, I still sometimes slip up and/or am not sure whether or not some people are fine with being referred to as "he/him" before their transition) had the same tenor as the 1980 US Men's hockey team--i.e., rah rah, we beat the Soviets, USA #1! It was a big deal.
I'm not disputing that but being part of the Kardashian/Jenner clan increased her visibility in the last years enormously. She was far more in the spotlight before transitioning than she would have as just a retired Olympic legend. Even the transition and now her life as a woman is percieved as a Keeping Up With The Kardashians spin off with the expected media circus around it all.
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 7:01 pm
by Wendy Carlos's Twin
Simple Torture wrote:
I think it has everything to do with what electro mentioned above (gay marriage being legalized) and with Caitlyn Jenner's visibility--no, really. I think most of the people who write and support these laws and policies basically didn't believe transgendered people existed, that they were just some urban myth or something that existed in a 4-block area of NYC.
Exactly. The unfortunate problem with these people is that they usually don't understand the basic fundamentals of the things that they are making laws against. It's the same deal as what I said in the pot thread...one of the first things that those idiots always say is that a surge in "overdoses" will be a threat to taxpayers and the medical system. And the fact that nobody has ever stopped them or corrected them is astonishing. 99% of these people don't even know the basic difference between a transgender and a cross-dresser.
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 9:12 pm
by i got bugs
Simple Torture wrote:i got bugs wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:its not just assault.Its a privacy issue. If women are uncomfortable with biological males using their bathrooms, that should be respected, and its certainly not for any of us males to say "stop worrying about it! It's not like they are going to rape you."
Exactly
My point is for every 1 transsexual uncomfortable with using a bathroom, there's like a thousand females understandably uncomfortable about someone with guy parts in the same bathroom as them
It's just for the greater good of the number of individuals involved..
If the majority of society was uncomfortable with blacks using the same drinking fountains as white people, you'd be down with that, yeah?
(Let's be clear: public drinking fountains are fucking disgusting; I've never not seen someone go full-Pawnee on one.)
It's completely different, color has the same body parts
If it's not an issue why didn't we just have universal bathrooms to begin with
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 9:25 pm
by Simple Torture
i got bugs wrote:Simple Torture wrote:i got bugs wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:its not just assault.Its a privacy issue. If women are uncomfortable with biological males using their bathrooms, that should be respected, and its certainly not for any of us males to say "stop worrying about it! It's not like they are going to rape you."
Exactly
My point is for every 1 transsexual uncomfortable with using a bathroom, there's like a thousand females understandably uncomfortable about someone with guy parts in the same bathroom as them
It's just for the greater good of the number of individuals involved..
If the majority of society was uncomfortable with blacks using the same drinking fountains as white people, you'd be down with that, yeah?
(Let's be clear: public drinking fountains are fucking disgusting; I've never not seen someone go full-Pawnee on one.)
It's completely different, color has the same body parts
If it's not an issue why didn't we just have universal bathrooms to begin with
It's not a perfect analogy, but 50 years ago, there were lots of people that believed simply having a different skin color was dangerous--blacks were dirty, more prone to violence, and were a threat to the purity of the white race (hell, there are still lots of people who believe these things today). You said you're for the greatest good for the greatest number of individuals involved--so even if you didn't agree that skin color mattered or was something to be uncomfortable about, if a majority did, wouldn't you just have to grin and bear it? And I'm not sure when and where the practice of separate washrooms began--it'd be an interesting study.
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 10:22 pm
by BurtReynolds
its not a good analogy. Apologize at once.
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 10:44 pm
by Simple Torture
Buuuuuuuuuuuurt, I'm soooooooooooooo sooooooooooorry about my anaaaaaaaaalogy.
- Spoiler: show

Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 10:47 pm
by Norah
well duh
- Spoiler: show

Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 10:50 pm
by B
I'm worried about my boys being raped by gay pedophiles in public restrooms. Where's my law? Where's my god damned law?
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 11:16 pm
by Self
Fine, assholes. No more bathrooms.
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Wed April 27, 2016 11:19 pm
by BurtReynolds
cutuphalfdead wrote:well duh
- Spoiler: show


Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Thu April 28, 2016 12:44 am
by i got bugs
Like I said tho.. I'm not so much worried about the actual transsexuals as I am the sick fucks that take advantage of the of the bathroom rule to go in
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Thu April 28, 2016 12:46 am
by i got bugs
B wrote:I'm worried about my boys being raped by gay pedophiles in public restrooms. Where's my law? Where's my god damned law?
Honestly that's kinda scary too..
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Thu April 28, 2016 12:49 am
by LoathedVermin72
i got bugs wrote:Like I said tho.. I'm not so much worried about the actual transsexuals as I am the sick fucks that take advantage of the of the bathroom rule to go in
So, in the name of that statistically unsupportable fear, you're willing to systematically dehumanize an entire group of already heavily-persecuted people?
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Thu April 28, 2016 12:58 am
by i got bugs
To say it couldn't happen and won't happen is naive
Honestly tho what's the big deal about just going into the bathroom w the based on the parts you have
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Thu April 28, 2016 1:02 am
by Simple Torture
LoathedVermin72 wrote:i got bugs wrote:Like I said tho.. I'm not so much worried about the actual transsexuals as I am the sick fucks that take advantage of the of the bathroom rule to go in
So, in the name of that statistically unsupportable fear, you're willing to systematically dehumanize an entire group of already heavily-persecuted people?
Haven't you been paying attention? Jeremy Bentham over here is sure that, like, only 1 in 1000 people are going to be hurt by this stuff, so we've got to take care of those 999 even though the 1 is also--statistically--prone to sexual violence, hate crimes, being fired or evicted, substance abuse, and being driven to suicide because they're consistently told they don't fit into the natural, normal order of things. Wake up, sheeple!
Re: Transgender Rights
Posted: Thu April 28, 2016 1:03 am
by Simple Torture
i got bugs wrote:To say it couldn't happen and won't happen is naive
Honestly tho what's the big deal about just going into the bathroom w the based on the parts you have
Where does an intersex person go to the bathroom, if you're so sure that, "Hey, just go according to your parts!' is a fool-proof plan?