Re: George Zimmerman found not guilty
Posted: Sun July 21, 2013 2:31 pm
The last sane man in America!
bart wrote:The last sane man in America!
If it weren't for the edited CNN/NBC transcripts, would there be much national media coverage? Whoever makes the most noise early on tends to control the narrative, it would seem.--- wrote:I wonder with which media outlets Harry Lime is most acquainted.
George Zimmerman Emerged From Hiding for Truck Crash Rescue
July 22, 2013
By MATT GUTMAN and ALEXIS SHAW
George Zimmerman, who has been in hiding since he was acquitted of murder in the death of Trayvon Martin, emerged to help rescue someone who was trapped in an overturned truck, police said today.
Sanford Police Department Capt. Jim McAuliffe told ABC News that Zimmerman "pulled an individual from a truck that had rolled over" at the intersection of a Florida highway last week.
The crash occurred at the intersection of I-4 and route 417, police said. The crash site is less than a mile from where he shot Martin.
It's the first known sighting of Zimmerman since he left the courtroom following his acquittal last week on murder charges for the death of Martin. Zimmerman, 29, shot and killed Martin, 17, in Sanford, Fla., on Feb. 26, 2012. The jury determined that Zimmerman shot Martin in self-defense.
The acquittal prompted dozens of protests across the country this past weekend and his lawyers have said that Zimmerman has been the subject of death threats. His lawyers said Zimmerman has been wearing a bullet-proof vest when he ventures out in public.
Zimmerman's parents told ABC News' Barbara Walters they too have received death threats and have been unable to return to their home.
Zimmerman's Parents in Hiding from 'Enormous Amount of Death Threats': ABC News Exclusive
"We have had an enormous amount of death threats. George's legal counsel has had death threats, the police chief of Sanford, many people have had death threats," Zimmerman's father, Robert Zimmerman said."'Everyone with Georgie's DNA should be killed' -- just every kind of horrible thing you can imagine."
shinkdew wrote:George Zimmerman Emerged From Hiding for Truck Crash Rescue
July 22, 2013
By MATT GUTMAN and ALEXIS SHAW
George Zimmerman, who has been in hiding since he was acquitted of murder in the death of Trayvon Martin, emerged to help rescue someone who was trapped in an overturned truck, police said today.
Sanford Police Department Capt. Jim McAuliffe told ABC News that Zimmerman "pulled an individual from a truck that had rolled over" at the intersection of a Florida highway last week.
The crash occurred at the intersection of I-4 and route 417, police said. The crash site is less than a mile from where he shot Martin.
It's the first known sighting of Zimmerman since he left the courtroom following his acquittal last week on murder charges for the death of Martin. Zimmerman, 29, shot and killed Martin, 17, in Sanford, Fla., on Feb. 26, 2012. The jury determined that Zimmerman shot Martin in self-defense.
The acquittal prompted dozens of protests across the country this past weekend and his lawyers have said that Zimmerman has been the subject of death threats. His lawyers said Zimmerman has been wearing a bullet-proof vest when he ventures out in public.
Zimmerman's parents told ABC News' Barbara Walters they too have received death threats and have been unable to return to their home.
Zimmerman's Parents in Hiding from 'Enormous Amount of Death Threats': ABC News Exclusive
"We have had an enormous amount of death threats. George's legal counsel has had death threats, the police chief of Sanford, many people have had death threats," Zimmerman's father, Robert Zimmerman said."'Everyone with Georgie's DNA should be killed' -- just every kind of horrible thing you can imagine."
I pity the guy tried for minor pot posession by a jury with Peeps on it. I'd agree that emotion is not a good justification for a guilty/ not guilty decision, but frequently the letter of the law is equally bad.Peeps wrote:she did the right thing
justice isnt about what you feel in your heart, but what is the letter of the law
simple schoolboy wrote:I pity the guy tried for minor pot posession by a jury with Peeps on it. I'd agree that emotion is not a good justification for a guilty/ not guilty decision, but frequently the letter of the law is equally bad.Peeps wrote:she did the right thing
justice isnt about what you feel in your heart, but what is the letter of the law
the same as i did during every point of this story.Man in Black wrote:Folks, let's make this a teaching moment.
For all you libs, share with the group how you felt when you found out Zimmerman wasn't white.
I'm here for you.
You folks do have conventional wisdom on your side but the entire purose of a jury is lost on me if it is not intended to serve as an outlet for popular opinion. If we go by Judge Dread rules where the law is the law and the only metric for morality, then why not opt for a continental system where a panel of judges tries a case. After all, they are well schooled on matters of law.broken iris wrote:simple schoolboy wrote:I pity the guy tried for minor pot posession by a jury with Peeps on it. I'd agree that emotion is not a good justification for a guilty/ not guilty decision, but frequently the letter of the law is equally bad.Peeps wrote:she did the right thing
justice isnt about what you feel in your heart, but what is the letter of the law
Yo, Peeps is right here. This juror did the morally right thing as it's not up to the her to try and put a little fixin' on laws by not following them or ignoring the orders of the judge, not matter how misguided they may be. I feel Zimmerman is guilty of manslaughter, but I was not a juror on that case and if the prosecution didn't meet the standards of Florida law, then he must be found innocent.
The purpose (as I understand) is to provide transparency to the legal system. Were it not for the jury system, legal decisions would be the exclusive domain of state-appointed judges. It's also intended as some kind of fail-safe as the prosecution needs to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt in the eyes of 12 random individuals (with the presumption that this may be a higher bar to meet than were it before only a learned judge). Popular opinion really has no role to play (nor should it).simple schoolboy wrote:You folks do have conventional wisdom on your side but the entire purose of a jury is lost on me if it is not intended to serve as an outlet for popular opinion.
I don't think this is what anyone is claiming. On that point, however, I don't think there exists any higher authority than law. We all have our own individual sense of morality, of course, but I have little time for any person claiming moral authority to act outside of the law - or, to be more specific, little time for those claiming the legal repercussions of doing so are somehow undeserved or unjust.simple schoolboy wrote:If we go by Judge Dread rules where the law is the law and the only metric for morality...
Part and parcel that is what they are, a garnered collective of the common [people] which used to be assumed as the popular opinion. Is your issue here how they're interpreted and realeased by the greater media?cutuphalfdead wrote:I definitely don't want to live in a world where juries serve as an outlet for popular opinion.