Re: General Pearl Jam Praising
Posted: Wed August 28, 2013 3:22 pm
I like the studio version, it's just on an album that doesn't know what it is, so it sounds even worse as a symptom.
I don't dislike the studio version (I just typed stupid version...), and I may even like it more than (or as much as) the demo, but it could have been so much better. More than any other song on Backspacer except maybe Unthought Known there was potential here that wasn't reached.harmless wrote:I like the studio version, it's just on an album that doesn't know what it is, so it sounds even worse as a symptom.
Woman: Is that a fact?Heathen wrote:They listened to him
I suspect they cared less compared to when they worked with him in the past.harmless wrote:And yeah, any time they want the band can just put their collective foot down and refuse BOB's ideas. They either can't be arsed, or this is just what they wanted to do.
My main issue with it is that it sounds like a parody of the original (demo). Less would have been more here but they threw it away.Heathen wrote:the studio version is just unlistenable for me, even outside the context of the album
I felt this too. God i hope that weird vibe from the B'oB interview was because the band did what they wanted this time.Mine wrote:I suspect they cared less compared to when they worked with him in the past.harmless wrote:And yeah, any time they want the band can just put their collective foot down and refuse BOB's ideas. They either can't be arsed, or this is just what they wanted to do.
Agreed, it's just not one of the clunkers imo. If pushed, I'd add it to UK and Supersonic as songs that could've been more. Backspacer is a strong album without those three (or is it an EP?). Maybe that's what Mike meant when he said there's a new E.P in six months; most of you will delete three or four of these from your playlists by then.stip wrote:I don't dislike the studio version (I just typed stupid version...), and I may even like it more than (or as much as) the demo, but it could have been so much better. More than any other song on Backspacer except maybe Unthought Known there was potential here that wasn't reached.harmless wrote:I like the studio version, it's just on an album that doesn't know what it is, so it sounds even worse as a symptom.
harmless wrote:Agreed, it's just not one of the clunkers imo. If pushed, I'd add it to UK and Supersonic as songs that could've been more. Backspacer is a strong album without those three (or is it an EP?). Maybe that's what Mike meant when he said there's a new E.P in six months; most of you will delete three or four of these from your playlists by then.stip wrote:I don't dislike the studio version (I just typed stupid version...), and I may even like it more than (or as much as) the demo, but it could have been so much better. More than any other song on Backspacer except maybe Unthought Known there was potential here that wasn't reached.harmless wrote:I like the studio version, it's just on an album that doesn't know what it is, so it sounds even worse as a symptom.
Heathen wrote:less is always more

I love that moment.harmless wrote:I'm not sure what they are. We've been calling them lasers. But they go 'wee--aaah--oooh' before the band goes into the louder third (?) chorus. I think of it as the part where Matt opens his hi-hat, starts smashing a china cymbal, and the song gets good. The lasers kind of wail through that too. Think Jean Michel Jarre.
VinylGuy wrote:I love that moment.harmless wrote:I'm not sure what they are. We've been calling them lasers. But they go 'wee--aaah--oooh' before the band goes into the louder third (?) chorus. I think of it as the part where Matt opens his hi-hat, starts smashing a china cymbal, and the song gets good. The lasers kind of wail through that too. Think Jean Michel Jarre.