Page 9 of 14
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 1:33 am
by EJ
BurtReynolds wrote:something i read recently. have no idea if its true or not.
Eyelids for sleeping Ewoks had to be created by ILM for The Ewok Adventure, since the original masks used in Return of the Jedi did not have any. A recent Blu-ray release for Return of the Jedi would digitally add them, however, allowing the dry-eyed heroes to blink for the first time.
they probably had some wear and tear on them too.
I'm not seeing any eyelids or blinking. Creepy. And where's its other paw?
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 1:34 am
by LoathedVermin72
BurtReynolds wrote:GODDAMNIT STOP MAKING ME TALK ABOUT STAR WARS I HATE THAT FUCCKING MOVIE
This isn't SW. It's ewoks.
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 1:34 am
by tommymtcom
EJ wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:something i read recently. have no idea if its true or not.
Eyelids for sleeping Ewoks had to be created by ILM for The Ewok Adventure, since the original masks used in Return of the Jedi did not have any. A recent Blu-ray release for Return of the Jedi would digitally add them, however, allowing the dry-eyed heroes to blink for the first time.
they probably had some wear and tear on them too.
I'm not seeing any eyelids or blinking. Creepy. And where's its other paw?
You don't want to know.
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 1:38 am
by LoathedVermin72
tommymtcom wrote:EJ wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:something i read recently. have no idea if its true or not.
Eyelids for sleeping Ewoks had to be created by ILM for The Ewok Adventure, since the original masks used in Return of the Jedi did not have any. A recent Blu-ray release for Return of the Jedi would digitally add them, however, allowing the dry-eyed heroes to blink for the first time.
they probably had some wear and tear on them too.
I'm not seeing any eyelids or blinking. Creepy. And where's its other paw?
You don't want to know.

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 1:40 am
by BurtReynolds
LoathedVermin72 wrote:BurtReynolds wrote:GODDAMNIT STOP MAKING ME TALK ABOUT STAR WARS I HATE THAT FUCCKING MOVIE
This isn't SW. It's ewoks.
i will allow it
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 1:42 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
if a guy's looking for a good time, should he listen to this?
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 1:43 am
by tommymtcom
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:if a guy's looking for a good time, should he listen to this?
Go watch some Curb Your Enthusiasm.
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 1:44 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
tommymtcom wrote:lennytheweedwhacker wrote:if a guy's looking for a good time, should he listen to this?
Go watch some Curb Your Enthusiasm.
what's that?
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 2:49 am
by stip
Strat wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:
I may have had a crush on her when i watched that in my youth.
that's basically what my youngest daughter is going to look like in a few years...
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 2:57 am
by stip
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 3:00 am
by BurtReynolds
that's what she looks like now!
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 3:11 am
by stip
time flies!
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Wed January 13, 2016 3:36 am
by VinylGuy
Great conversation guys. I really appreciate this, and its nice to actually have a talk about a theme.
Thoughts:
- michael bay is an auteur. True.
- movie making is such a collective expression. Great discussion.
- i would adore to talk with Joey about Girls for hours. Im guessing he has some really good thoughts about it.
- Agree with LV's take on ROTJ.
Looking forward to the next one!!
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Tue January 26, 2016 8:45 pm
by Dev
I went and saw Brooklyn because of you guys, which makes no sense because I don't agree with any of your opinions, but I was like, "oh yeh, my rm bros must be right," but I definitely could have lived without seeing the movie.
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Tue January 26, 2016 8:49 pm
by epilogue
Dev wrote:I went and saw Brooklyn because of you guys, which makes no sense because I don't agree with any of your opinions, but I was like, "oh yeh, my rm bros must be right," but I definitely could have lived without seeing the movie.

Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Tue January 26, 2016 8:49 pm
by epilogue
Sorry you didn't like it, Dev.
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Tue January 26, 2016 8:50 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
i still haven't listened to this
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Tue January 26, 2016 8:52 pm
by Dev
durdencommatyler wrote:Sorry you didn't like it, Dev.
it wasn't a bad movie necessarily, but it didn't have any real impact on me either. And I think her story is kind of an unbecoming story... so that puts me off.
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Tue January 26, 2016 8:53 pm
by tommymtcom
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:i still haven't listened to this
Why not?
Re: Sharing Cinematic Values #1: durdencommatyler
Posted: Tue January 26, 2016 8:54 pm
by epilogue
Dev wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Sorry you didn't like it, Dev.
it wasn't a bad movie necessarily, but it didn't have any real impact on me either. And I think her story is kind of an unbecoming story... so that puts me off.
Interesting. What was unbecoming about it for you?