Red Mosquito

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.

tragabigzanda wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

It was probably La La Land.

I'm pretty sure, after thinking about it, that it was Avatar. Which is a way worse movie than either Blade Runner 2049 or La La Land.

I've never seen Avatar

durdencommatyler wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

It was probably La La Land.

I'm pretty sure, after thinking about it, that it was Avatar. Which is a way worse movie than either Blade Runner 2049 or La La Land.

I've never seen Avatar

It's fine. There are worse things. But I was really glad that I saw it in theaters. I tried watching it at home (well, at a friend's home) once and I couldn't bother finishing the thing. Whatever it does well, it needs the big screen experience.

Strat wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

It was probably La La Land.

I'm pretty sure, after thinking about it, that it was Avatar. Which is a way worse movie than either Blade Runner 2049 or La La Land.

I've never seen Avatar

It's fine. There are worse things. But I was really glad that I saw it in theaters. I tried watching it at home (well, at a friend's home) once and I couldn't bother finishing the thing. Whatever it does well, it needs the big screen experience.

I also think it holds no repeat viewing qualities. I saw it once at home and enjoyed it. Tried to watch it since with absolutely 0 luck.

durdencommatyler wrote:

Strat wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

It was probably La La Land.

I'm pretty sure, after thinking about it, that it was Avatar. Which is a way worse movie than either Blade Runner 2049 or La La Land.

I've never seen Avatar

It's fine. There are worse things. But I was really glad that I saw it in theaters. I tried watching it at home (well, at a friend's home) once and I couldn't bother finishing the thing. Whatever it does well, it needs the big screen experience.

I also think it holds no repeat viewing qualities. I saw it once at home and enjoyed it. Tried to watch it since with absolutely 0 luck.

There you go. That's totally possible. It's a pretty shallow film that doesn't really require your repeated attention. You kinda get it the first time.

VinylGuy wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

i saw it on IMAX. Its the only proper way to see this piece of art.

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

Strat wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:

tragabigzanda wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

It was probably La La Land.

I'm pretty sure, after thinking about it, that it was Avatar. Which is a way worse movie than either Blade Runner 2049 or La La Land.

I've never seen Avatar

It's fine. There are worse things. But I was really glad that I saw it in theaters. I tried watching it at home (well, at a friend's home) once and I couldn't bother finishing the thing. Whatever it does well, it needs the big screen experience.

I also think it holds no repeat viewing qualities. I saw it once at home and enjoyed it. Tried to watch it since with absolutely 0 luck.

There you go. That's totally possible. It's a pretty shallow film that doesn't really require your repeated attention. You kinda get it the first time.

yet they are currently filming 4 more of them.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

i saw it on IMAX. Its the only proper way to see this piece of art.

My TV > Dolby Cinema > IMAX

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

i saw it on IMAX. Its the only proper way to see this piece of art.

My TV > Dolby Cinema > IMAX

For this movie, though, it is about the scale. Picture quality too, yes, but you have that at home. But this is great on a HUGE screen, LV.

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

i saw it on IMAX. Its the only proper way to see this piece of art.

My TV > Dolby Cinema > IMAX

For this movie, though, it is about the scale. Picture quality too, yes, but you have that at home. But this is great on a HUGE screen, LV.

What if I just sit really really really close to my TV

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

VinylGuy wrote:

durdencommatyler wrote:I just don't know anyone with a TV that's sized for this movie. This needs a nice giant screen. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Man, this made all the difference! I'm so glad I saw this in a theater, on a big screen. I can't imagine watching this at home."

i saw it on IMAX. Its the only proper way to see this piece of art.

My TV > Dolby Cinema > IMAX

For this movie, though, it is about the scale. Picture quality too, yes, but you have that at home. But this is great on a HUGE screen, LV.

What if I just sit really really really close to my TV

Strat wrote:what TV do you have LV?

Strat wrote:what TV do you have LV?

Strat wrote:what TV do you have LV?

E.H. Ruddock wrote:

Strat wrote:what TV do you have LV?

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

Strat wrote:what TV do you have LV?

65" Samsung KS8500

durdencommatyler wrote:

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

Strat wrote:what TV do you have LV?

65" Samsung KS8500

Curved?

LoathedVermin72 wrote:

Strat wrote:what TV do you have LV?

65" Samsung KS8500