Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)
Posted: Wed January 06, 2016 10:02 pm
Kaius wrote:Team Mecca.

Kaius wrote:Team Mecca.

BurtReynolds wrote:Why is the Kylo/Han story interesting to you? Its certainly not interesting in the way its blurted out to you in a few lines of dialogue and a few vague flashbacks. Literally anyone can come up with that backstory, and since its all exposition, you don't even have to film it. You don't have to craft interesting characters or stories. I mean, it could potentially be good hook for a story (almost certainly more interesting that FA), but as it is executed it very clearly comes off as rehashed elements of previous movies, with none of the character investment or emotional connection (except a nostalgic love for Han Solo), all to ultimately serve as a crude device to tell the same story again. Because that's exactly what it is.
from a storytelling standpoint I only ask that decisions come organically from what we know about a character or if they aren't organic, the missing pieces are explained. Han's story after the OT up until his death is organic and that satisfies that need for me.BurtReynolds wrote:LV was arguing that this story wasn't worth telling in the first place. Stip was arguing that it beautifully wrapped up Han's arc. McP was offering up better alternatives.Mecca wrote:nobody is arguing whether it is interesting or not.BurtReynolds wrote:watMecca wrote:lot of assumptions in this premise.BurtReynolds wrote:Why is the Kylo/Han story interesting to you? Its certainly not interesting in the way its blurted out to you in a few lines of dialogue and a few vague flashbacks. Literally anyone can come up with that backstory, and since its all exposition, you don't even have to film it. You don't have to craft interesting characters or stories. I mean, it could potentially be good hook for a story (almost certainly more interesting that FA), but as it is executed it very clearly comes off as rehashed elements of previous movies, with none of the character investment or emotional connection (except a nostalgic love for Han Solo), all to ultimately serve as a crude device to tell the same story again. Because that's exactly what it is.
But I shouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth here so: Great then we are all in agreement that this isn't interesting. Can we also agree that this uninteresting idea isn't executed well? Please oh please oh please.
Mecca wrote:Kaius wrote:Team Mecca.
This post totally ripped off my post from two pages ago.Strat wrote:Star Wars: Episode VII — The Force Awakens has been praised for many things, and while it's not without it's flaws, the film certainly did Han Solo justice. Many fans were concerned that this older version of Han wouldn't line up with the space cowboy scoundrel we know and love from the original trilogy. And while his story in Star Wars 7 did take an unexpected turn, ultimately this really was the best thing for the character.
Killing off such a beloved character was bound to garner criticism from fans. Some argued that the way he died didn't do justice to the character: that Han should have gone down in a blaze of glory. As it happened, Han Solo's death paralleled Obi Wan Kenobi's in A New Hope, right down to his protoges viewing the death and being forced to flee soon after.
Parallels aside, this death was actually the most in character way for Han Solo to die, and here's how it also sets up his role in Episode 8.
"I used to be Han Solo"
We get an interesting view of Han Solo in Star Wars 7: Finn remembers Han as a war hero, while Rey is more impressed with his deeds as a smuggler. Yet when Rey asks if he is Han Solo, Han responds "I used to be", implying he feels distanced from the legend he became.
Han Solo is a man of many disguises. With his roguish attitude it's easy to assume he's just a scoundrel, but the original films proved time and again that Han Solo has a heart of gold. From coming back to help the Rebellion in A New Hope, to leading the charge on Endor in Return Of The Jedi, this scruffy looking nerfhurder isn't nearly as gruff as he'd like us to believe. This is especially apparent in his relationships with both Leia and Luke, both of whom he cares for deeply.
"That's two you owe me, kid."
As the film begins with Han risking his own life to save Luke, we definitely see a softer side to Han Solo in The Empire Strikes Back. And although he spends a lot of effort seducing her, when Leia is anxious on Bespin Han's first instinct is to support her.
We see this compassionate tendency in Han Solo again in The Force Awakens, as he takes Finn and Rey under his wing, even offering Rey a job. His affection towards these kids he barely knows is obvious, and very true to Han's character.
Although the popular interpretation of Han Solo is that he's a womanising space cowboy, underneath the bravado he's really just a softie. Which is why his death played out perfectly.
Noble Sacrifice
Ultimately, Han Solo is on a mission to save his son, the twisted and torn Dark Side acolyte, Kylo Ren. At first he's reluctant to reach out to Ben, but Leia has faith that where Luke Skywalker failed, Han Solo can bring her son back to the Light.
Of course, Han fails. But the important thing is he put himself in danger in an attempt to save his son from the Dark Side. And honestly, I can't think of any action more quintessentially Han Solo than sacrificing himself trying to save someone else. The fantastic thing is, as the newly released screenplay confirms, Han Solo's death may have started Kylo Ren's redemption anyway...
The novelisation also deals with Kylo Ren's shock: it turns out that although he thought killing his father would complete his journey to the Dark Side, his guilt just makes him wish to turn back to the Light more.
So how does this set up Han Solo's appearance in Episode 8? Well, as Snoke completes Kylo Ren's training, we're bound to see him struggle with this inner conflict more. In order to help the audience understand Ben Solo's journey, the best way to do this would be through flashbacks, and that's definitely a way to include Han Solo. Visions and Force ghosts are other options, though as Han never trained as a Jedi, seeing him as a ghost is pretty unlikely.
But considering Kylo Ren is definitely feeling guilty about his father's death, there's no doubt Han Solo's presence will be felt in Star Wars Episode 8... one way or another.
I never cared for the 'we're home' line. Even in the trailers that one never moved me.BurtReynolds wrote:Han Solo was far more interested in finding his ship than reconnecting with Leia or saving his son. And I suspect that most fanboys had the strongest reaction to Han saying "we're home" than any of his interactions with his ex or whiny kid.
I hope instead of episodes 10, 11, and 12 we get Episodes 6-1, 6-B, and 6.99Mecca wrote:realistically, if they were continuing the story from the OT up until this point, we would have a fleshed out story of how things got to be this way, but they didn't and all we are left with is exposition
aside from fan service, finding the falcon was a way of finding his way back to his old self. The reasons he stayed away from Leia and his son are also established and organic. I mean, he an Leia basically say they went back to their old lives as a coping mechanism for giving birth to a horrible person that threatened the way of life they had worked for. It's organic, burt!BurtReynolds wrote:Han Solo was far more interested in finding his ship than reconnecting with Leia or saving his son. And I suspect that most fanboys had the strongest reaction to Han saying "we're home" than any of his interactions with his ex or whiny kid.
only if one of them is titled "The Force Goes to Bed" so that the arc of the Force awakening is completedstip wrote:I hope instead of episodes 10, 11, and 12 we get Episodes 6-1, 6-B, and 6.99Mecca wrote:realistically, if they were continuing the story from the OT up until this point, we would have a fleshed out story of how things got to be this way, but they didn't and all we are left with is exposition
Han Solo: The Domesticated yearsMecca wrote:only if one of them is titled "The Force Goes to Bed" so that the arc of the Force awakening is completedstip wrote:I hope instead of episodes 10, 11, and 12 we get Episodes 6-1, 6-B, and 6.99Mecca wrote:realistically, if they were continuing the story from the OT up until this point, we would have a fleshed out story of how things got to be this way, but they didn't and all we are left with is exposition
guess they should've gone with "Jedi Brown" instead of "Vader Black" for the crib's color.stip wrote:I can't wait until they take the millennium falcon to Ikea to buy furniture for the baby's room.
It's fair to say if you look at Ford's performance, the script, the importance the movie gives to his ship, etc. Again, we are simply told his relationship with Leia is damaged, not shown (and when they reconnect its treated like they had a little spat and everything is patched up). Same with his son. In contrast, Han finding his ship is treated like finding the Holy Grail (because spaceships sell toys, not space princesses). Stop looking at it merely from a plot perspective.stip wrote:I never cared for the 'we're home' line. Even in the trailers that one never moved me.BurtReynolds wrote:Han Solo was far more interested in finding his ship than reconnecting with Leia or saving his son. And I suspect that most fanboys had the strongest reaction to Han saying "we're home" than any of his interactions with his ex or whiny kid.
And I don't think it's fair to say he's more interested. The ship is safe. His relationship with Leia is damaged and he thinks his son is beyond redemption (but he trusts/cares enough for Leia and his son to risk his life to try anyway).