Re: Dylan
Posted: Tue August 13, 2013 6:47 pm
I wanted to grab that set but I couldn't justify spending the money.
cutuphalfdead wrote:I wanted to grab that set but I couldn't justify spending the money.
It was definitely a good deal. I just didn't have the cash to drop.Strat wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:I wanted to grab that set but I couldn't justify spending the money.
Im looking at it right now and it was so worth the coin! its so lovely and to have those 8 albums for that price. Drool city.
I plan on weeping with Bobby D for the next few weeks in my listening room.
cutuphalfdead wrote:It was definitely a good deal. I just didn't have the cash to drop.Strat wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:I wanted to grab that set but I couldn't justify spending the money.
Im looking at it right now and it was so worth the coin! its so lovely and to have those 8 albums for that price. Drool city.
I plan on weeping with Bobby D for the next few weeks in my listening room.
Rips made the rounds. I know you enjoy spinning vinyl but if you want the (16 bit) files let me know.cutuphalfdead wrote:I wanted to grab that set but I couldn't justify spending the money.
I'd love them.oasisfan35 wrote:Rips made the rounds. I know you enjoy spinning vinyl but if you want the (16 bit) files let me know.cutuphalfdead wrote:I wanted to grab that set but I couldn't justify spending the money.
Yeah...his stylistic shifts from his debut to John Wesley Harding is pretty fucking incredible. That does seem like 15 years worth of change for a prolific artist. Let alone 5-6 years for one not even out of his mid-20s. There must have been a lot of weight on his shoulders, being a spokesman for at least one movement and a generation years before he gets to 30. Mind-blowing.Strat wrote:Aside from the incredible amount of music this Nice young fellow has put out over the past 50 years, how fucking insane is it what he put out between 61-67??
Yes, im tearing through this boxed set. Good fucking lord. he was 20 years old when first record was recorded and still a young 26 by the time John Wesley Harding came out.
That is very difficult for me to wrap my head around.
Wrote "Blowin in the Wind" at 20. And "Hard Rains" at like 21! Yeah, you don't see many 20 year olds in the industry doing that.Gods' Die wrote:Yeah...his stylistic shifts from his debut to John Wesley Harding is pretty fucking incredible. That does seem like 15 years worth of change for a prolific artist. Let alone 5-6 years for one not even out of his mid-20s. There must have been a lot of weight on his shoulders, being a spokesman for at least one movement and a generation years before he gets to 30. Mind-blowing.Strat wrote:Aside from the incredible amount of music this Nice young fellow has put out over the past 50 years, how fucking insane is it what he put out between 61-67??
Yes, im tearing through this boxed set. Good fucking lord. he was 20 years old when first record was recorded and still a young 26 by the time John Wesley Harding came out.
That is very difficult for me to wrap my head around.
Him and the Beatles, I'll never be able to understand for exactly that reason. I mean, Paul McCartney had just turned 27 when the Beatles finished recording Abbey Road, and that (beyond a few overdub sessions on Let it Be tracks) was the end of that band's story. So pretty much everything he did with that band, he did by the time he left his 26th year.Strat wrote:Aside from the incredible amount of music this Nice young fellow has put out over the past 50 years, how fucking insane is it what he put out between 61-67??
Yes, im tearing through this boxed set. Good fucking lord. he was 20 years old when first record was recorded and still a young 26 by the time John Wesley Harding came out.
That is very difficult for me to wrap my head around.
0:54Strat wrote:
"If you were going to sell out to a corporate interest (??) which one would you?"Harry Lime wrote:0:54Strat wrote:![]()
Have you seen that San Francisco press conference from 1965? Classic.
haha. oh yeah that's right. I forgot about that.Strat wrote:"If you were going to sell out to a corporate interest (??) which one would you?"Harry Lime wrote:0:54Strat wrote:![]()
Have you seen that San Francisco press conference from 1965? Classic.
"uh.....ladies garments"
And so it is!
Great version, and fun fact: One of the female backing singers on this is Katey Sagal, who would later go on to play Peg Bundy on "Married With Children."super nintendo chalmers wrote:
And how was it?verb_to_trust wrote:Guys, I bought a ticket.