Re: The 45th POTUS - Donald J. Trump
Posted: Tue March 26, 2019 5:38 pm
I guess my analogy refers more to the behavior of the adherents to birtherism vs. Russiagate rather than the details/reasoning behind each one.
Goes without saying.verb_to_trust wrote:Fuck Donald Trump though
meatwad wrote:Goes without saying.verb_to_trust wrote:Fuck Donald Trump though
There are plenty of reasons to abhor DJT. Colluding with Russians, however, is no longer a viable or rational reason.
I'm not particularly surprised by that conclusion in the report; I've been very unclear about even if there was some unsavory stuff going on in the Trump campaign in regards to the issue, whether any of it was indictable. But it'll be interesting to read the report, and if Trump tries to block its release, hopefully it'll be leaked. The obstruction result of the report is more surprising, could be far more damaging long term, and may be a misstep on the part of the Special Counsel. It's definitely the part of the report I'd be more interested in reading.meatwad wrote:Goes without saying.verb_to_trust wrote:Fuck Donald Trump though
There are plenty of reasons to abhor DJT. Colluding with Russians, however, is no longer a viable or rational reason.
Maybe? Or maybe the whole collusion investigation just made hating the other side 'cool'. Like a bandwagon thing. And it's not the report but the behavior of the media over the last few years WRT Trump and Russia. Honestly, did you remember mainstream late night television hosts saying anything like "suck Putin's ****" when Obama was President? I realize how old I must seem, but it's just different now and I can't help but think the whole Russian collusion issue gave the haters the excuse they needed.digster wrote: Compared to that, even if you grant Trump the most lenient possible reading of the report's conclusions, it's just extremely difficult for me to see how this reaches that type of impact. I don't think it's going to impact how foreign allies and adversaries interact with us; it hasn't seemed to thus far. And the impact it does have (it's causing us to be more polarized and distrust each other and our institutions) were already there prior to the Mueller report; they were already there prior to Trump. I don't think the fact that half the country hates the other half and vice versa was going to go away regardless of what the report said.
I just don't know about that, personally; none of this venom we're seeing every single day in the country suddenly manifested itself with the collusion investigation; it predates Donald Trump altogether. Things were pretty awful throughout Obama's presidency, and certainly it was rough to watch during the 2016 election, before the special counsel was even a possible consideration.Bi_3 wrote:Maybe? Or maybe the whole collusion investigation just made hating the other side 'cool'. Like a bandwagon thing. And it's not the report but the behavior of the media over the last few years WRT Trump and Russia. Honestly, did you remember mainstream late night television hosts saying anything like "suck Putin's ****" when Obama was President? I realize how old I must seem, but it's just different now and I can't help but think the whole Russian collusion issue gave the haters the excuse they needed.digster wrote: Compared to that, even if you grant Trump the most lenient possible reading of the report's conclusions, it's just extremely difficult for me to see how this reaches that type of impact. I don't think it's going to impact how foreign allies and adversaries interact with us; it hasn't seemed to thus far. And the impact it does have (it's causing us to be more polarized and distrust each other and our institutions) were already there prior to the Mueller report; they were already there prior to Trump. I don't think the fact that half the country hates the other half and vice versa was going to go away regardless of what the report said.
The notion that any civil liberties advocate would say the solution to unchecked national security agencies (which is a real threat) is to settle for a chief executive with absolute power is a pretty odd stance to take (and one that a lot of leftists who have been skeptical of Russiagate haven't really tried to grapple with thus far).But the end result may be the same in terms of setting a new standard for future presidents. The hands-off attitude when it came to investigations of the past no longer applies.
“The extremes we have gone to accommodate the president’s authority are a terrible precedent for going forward as a democracy built on separation of power and balance of powers,” said Richard Ben-Veniste, a former Watergate prosecutor.
Mr. Rivkin, however, argued that the potential downside of a president interfering in law enforcement actions out of political motives was outweighed by the danger of such powerful agencies operating without anyone overseeing them.
“Do you want to have the F.B.I., C.I.A. and N.S.A. accountable to nobody but themselves?” he asked, citing “serious abuses of civil liberties” that have occurred in American history. “Choose your poison. When someone talks about the possibility of corruption, my response is what’s the alternative? Do you have a better alternative?”
Or maybe there is actually something to it, since the President is clearly bending over backwards for Russia, even after they attacked our election process to help him win?Bi_3 wrote: Maybe? Or maybe the whole collusion investigation just made hating the other side 'cool'. Like a bandwagon thing. And it's not the report but the behavior of the media over the last few years WRT Trump and Russia. Honestly, did you remember mainstream late night television hosts saying anything like "suck Putin's ****" when Obama was President? I realize how old I must seem, but it's just different now and I can't help but think the whole Russian collusion issue gave the haters the excuse they needed.
Do you remember how Donald Trump’s political rise was fashioned on insisting that the president was secretly not a US citizen, and may even be a terrorist, because he had a weird name and was black? Do you remember Fox News and even Republican politicians humoring those claims?Honestly, did you remember mainstream late night television hosts saying anything like "suck Putin's ****" when Obama was President?
That tan suit is right up there with targeted assassinations and drone killings as the worst actions of his presidency.dimejinky99 wrote:Not to forget their utter meltdown that time Obama simply wore a tan coloured suit.
4/5 wrote:That tan suit is right up there with targeted assassinations and drone killings as the worst actions of his presidency.dimejinky99 wrote:Not to forget their utter meltdown that time Obama simply wore a tan coloured suit.

Poor girl.Green Habit wrote:
My husband and I can’t figure it out, either, and I thought the last suggestion: diversion.
BUT IT’S SUCH A STUPID ONE!!!
GOP voters want “Repeal and Replace.”
Not “Repeal and good luck you poor stupid assholes.”
And the SCOTUS already upheld the ACA. TWICE. The same four liberal justices plus Roberts are there.
https://www-m.cnn.com/2015/06/25/politi ... gle.com%2F
The Democrats won back the House AT A MINIMUM TO KEEP THE ACA AND AT A MAXIMUM FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE.
I think Trump is gonna drop a bomb and say he’s not running in 2020. Because clearly this is a guy who wants to fail at 2020.
James Comey says he’s confused by Mueller’s decision re obstruction:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna987771
The Mueller grand jury is still active.
The piece doesn't go into any details or make any assumptions about what they're working on, but this is still important to note. I do wonder if we're seeing the reverse of the 2018-midterms. The first 24 hours, it seemed like it was a good night for Dems but not as good as it could have been, and then 2-3 weeks later, it turned it out it was a great night for Dems as more results came in and showed more gains. I'm wondering if Trumpians started celebrating too soon.