Page 82 of 176
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 2:43 pm
by pnjguy
I mean, they could have changed the name of OTE, its not out of the question.
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 2:44 pm
by harmless
broken iris wrote:harmless wrote:For the record: I'm totally fine with self-referencing. I don't get people's issue with it. The band / Ed has certain obsessions that run through all of their / his stuff. He's not the only one. I guess as long as they don't keep rehashing their worst ideas, at least it keeps the music entertaining.
Are you trying to
wave off criticism of the band's recent production?
There's plenty to criticise about the band lately, but self-referencing is on the bottom of my list. As long as they don't do it badly, it's fine.
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 2:51 pm
by EJ
harmless wrote:broken iris wrote:harmless wrote:For the record: I'm totally fine with self-referencing. I don't get people's issue with it. The band / Ed has certain obsessions that run through all of their / his stuff. He's not the only one. I guess as long as they don't keep rehashing their worst ideas, at least it keeps the music entertaining.
Are you trying to
wave off criticism of the band's recent production?
There's plenty to criticise about the band lately, but self-referencing is on the bottom of my list. As long as they don't do it badly, it's fine.
Predisposed To Be Airborne
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 2:53 pm
by harmless
EJ wrote:harmless wrote:broken iris wrote:harmless wrote:For the record: I'm totally fine with self-referencing. I don't get people's issue with it. The band / Ed has certain obsessions that run through all of their / his stuff. He's not the only one. I guess as long as they don't keep rehashing their worst ideas, at least it keeps the music entertaining.
Are you trying to
wave off criticism of the band's recent production?
There's plenty to criticise about the band lately, but self-referencing is on the bottom of my list. As long as they don't do it badly, it's fine.
Predisposed To Be Airborne
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 2:56 pm
by Jaeti
EJ wrote:harmless wrote:broken iris wrote:harmless wrote:For the record: I'm totally fine with self-referencing. I don't get people's issue with it. The band / Ed has certain obsessions that run through all of their / his stuff. He's not the only one. I guess as long as they don't keep rehashing their worst ideas, at least it keeps the music entertaining.
Are you trying to
wave off criticism of the band's recent production?
There's plenty to criticise about the band lately, but self-referencing is on the bottom of my list. As long as they don't do it badly, it's fine.
Predisposed To Be Airborne
Totally Fireable
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 2:56 pm
by EJ
harmless wrote:EJ wrote:harmless wrote:broken iris wrote:harmless wrote:For the record: I'm totally fine with self-referencing. I don't get people's issue with it. The band / Ed has certain obsessions that run through all of their / his stuff. He's not the only one. I guess as long as they don't keep rehashing their worst ideas, at least it keeps the music entertaining.
Are you trying to
wave off criticism of the band's recent production?
There's plenty to criticise about the band lately, but self-referencing is on the bottom of my list. As long as they don't do it badly, it's fine.
Predisposed To Be Airborne
You're too smart to not figure that one out. Using an old song title and renaming it. Just another stupid joke of mine in a long line of bad ones.
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 3:00 pm
by harmless
harmless wrote:Is there a legal / judicial phrase like "Let the records show that...?"
I answered my own question.
This book excerpt is from 'Let the Records Show'.
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=JYRf ... at&f=false
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 3:11 pm
by Lounge Lizard
Isn't it about time?
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 3:13 pm
by harmless
It's 4.15pm here. Doesn't usually start for me till the early evening.
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 3:17 pm
by broken iris
Jaeti wrote:EJ wrote:harmless wrote:broken iris wrote:harmless wrote:For the record: I'm totally fine with self-referencing. I don't get people's issue with it. The band / Ed has certain obsessions that run through all of their / his stuff. He's not the only one. I guess as long as they don't keep rehashing their worst ideas, at least it keeps the music entertaining.
Are you trying to
wave off criticism of the band's recent production?
There's plenty to criticise about the band lately, but self-referencing is on the bottom of my list. As long as they don't do it badly, it's fine.
Predisposed To Be Airborne
Totally Fireable
Diverging Paths
1/2 Empty
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 3:17 pm
by BoltofLightning
45 minutes...
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 3:27 pm
by Dr. Van Nostrand
BoltofLightning wrote:45 minutes...
im pretty sure they have been starting at 1pm eastern, so just over an hour and a half for the first piece of todays puzzle
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 3:28 pm
by harmless
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:BoltofLightning wrote:45 minutes...
im pretty sure they have been starting at 1pm eastern, so just over an hour and a half for the first piece of todays puzzle
This sounds about right.
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 3:29 pm
by Revelator
B wrote:Would it kill them to make Of The Earth a MYM b-side?
Exactly. This, or release it as a holiday single or some promotional shit.
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 3:53 pm
by taffer
So there are only twelve tunes , i'd like the running time of the album would've been ~ 60-65 minutes
+ betterman(live) as bones() track
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 3:55 pm
by EJ
taffer wrote:So there are only twelve tunes , i'd like the running time of the album would've been ~ 60-65 minutes
+ betterman(live) as bones() track
That would be a ridiculously long album. Riot Act is 54 minutes. And, that's a bit of a slog to listen to straight through.
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 3:56 pm
by harmless
Over 50 minutes would be awesome.
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 4:01 pm
by taffer
EJ wrote:taffer wrote:So there are only twelve tunes , i'd like the running time of the album would've been ~ 60-65 minutes
+ betterman(live) as bones() track
That would be a ridiculously long album. Riot Act is 54 minutes. And, that's a bit of a slog to listen to straight through.
i'm a big fan of aic-95 album and it runs a ridiculously quick, it's a matter of songs i guess,
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 4:03 pm
by harmless
I think anything "ridiculously quick" produced by Brendan O'Brien is going to be terrible.
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Posted: Thu August 29, 2013 4:07 pm
by Dr. Van Nostrand
harmless wrote:Over 50 minutes would be awesome.
Ill be happy with 45 to 50 though