Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 3:16 pm
stupidmop wrote:I hope eddie gave mark arm a copy of this to listen to and in turn mark arm gave him a kick to the crotch.
stupidmop wrote:I hope eddie gave mark arm a copy of this to listen to and in turn mark arm gave him a kick to the crotch.
McParadigm wrote:stupidmop wrote:I hope eddie gave mark arm a copy of this to listen to and in turn mark arm gave him a kick to the crotch.
Nevermind. Finally got it.hlniv wrote:I think PJ world jammed up Rdio. Can't get a confirmation email to sign up... Probably gone now anyway, I'm PJ legal team has swopped in by now.
Help? Anyone? Bueller?
No, it's not. But that doesn't mean the song can't be enjoyed (at least by me).LooseGroove927 wrote:It's like a parody of a rom com song.nomorecrackpipes wrote:This is a romantic comedy song.
I am speechless right now. This is not the Pearl Jam I know and love.
Yeah, as I said in the other thread, people are gonna need many spins to accept this for what it is instead of what it is not.harmless wrote:This doesn't sound like Pearl Jam. But is it a good song? Does Ed sound great? For me, the answers are yes and yes.
How much is your reaction about the fact that it's "bad", and how much is it that it's just a total left-turn? Actually this is most definitely a right turn, but you get my point. If after 23 years they wanted to do something brand-new, a lot of things would get the "This is not Pearl Jam" reaction. At the very least, even if I ended up hating it, they've committed to a completely different type of song and it succeeds at being exactly what it is.
Whatever it is.
McParadigm wrote:stupidmop wrote:I hope eddie gave mark arm a copy of this to listen to and in turn mark arm gave him a kick to the crotch.

That about perfectly sums it up for me.harmless wrote:This doesn't sound like Pearl Jam. But is it a good song? Does Ed sound great? For me, the answers are yes and yes.
How much is your reaction about the fact that it's "bad", and how much is it that it's just a total left-turn? Actually this is most definitely a right turn, but you get my point. If after 23 years they wanted to do something brand-new, a lot of things would get the "This is not Pearl Jam" reaction. At the very least, even if I ended up hating it, they've committed to a completely different type of song and it succeeds at being exactly what it is.
Whatever it is.
And I hope Eddie just says "thanks for ditching Stone and Jeff, dumbass" then tells him Mudhoney sucks and that he's done with the opening slot handouts.stupidmop wrote:I hope eddie gave mark arm a copy of this to listen to and in turn mark arm gave him a kick to the crotch.
I'm confused, too, but yeah. This is not what any of us mean here when we wish for "experimental", but it kind of is that.harmless wrote:This doesn't sound like Pearl Jam. But is it a good song? Does Ed sound great? For me, the answers are yes and yes.
How much is your reaction about the fact that it's "bad", and how much is it that it's just a total left-turn? Actually this is most definitely a right turn, but you get my point. If after 23 years they wanted to do something brand-new, a lot of things would get the "This is not Pearl Jam" reaction. At the very least, even if I ended up hating it, they've committed to a completely different type of song and it succeeds at being exactly what it is.
Whatever it is.
Thejambi wrote:As a Backspacer fan I can honestly say this album so far has given me no reason to listen to it again apart from FON and The End. Tickle me boys.
I think I agree.Dugg wrote:That about perfectly sums it up for me.harmless wrote:This doesn't sound like Pearl Jam. But is it a good song? Does Ed sound great? For me, the answers are yes and yes.
How much is your reaction about the fact that it's "bad", and how much is it that it's just a total left-turn? Actually this is most definitely a right turn, but you get my point. If after 23 years they wanted to do something brand-new, a lot of things would get the "This is not Pearl Jam" reaction. At the very least, even if I ended up hating it, they've committed to a completely different type of song and it succeeds at being exactly what it is.
Whatever it is.
Absolutely. It's like when people wish PJ were challenging and alienating still, like Stone said this album would be, "like No Code." Well, it is (what is this song if not challenging?), but this time it's Red Mosquito being alienated, not the Pit. It kind of hurts when you're the one being alienated!Jaeti wrote:I'm confused, too, but yeah. This is not what any of us mean here when we wish for "experimental", but it kind of is that.harmless wrote:This doesn't sound like Pearl Jam. But is it a good song? Does Ed sound great? For me, the answers are yes and yes.
How much is your reaction about the fact that it's "bad", and how much is it that it's just a total left-turn? Actually this is most definitely a right turn, but you get my point. If after 23 years they wanted to do something brand-new, a lot of things would get the "This is not Pearl Jam" reaction. At the very least, even if I ended up hating it, they've committed to a completely different type of song and it succeeds at being exactly what it is.
Whatever it is.
Good it is.harmless wrote:This doesn't sound like Pearl Jam. But is it a good song? Does Ed sound great? For me, the answers are yes and yes.
How much is your reaction about the fact that it's "bad", and how much is it that it's just a total left-turn? Actually this is most definitely a right turn, but you get my point. If after 23 years they wanted to do something brand-new, a lot of things would get the "This is not Pearl Jam" reaction. At the very least, even if I ended up hating it, they've committed to a completely different type of song and it succeeds at being exactly what it is.
Whatever it is.