Red Mosquito

spike wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:Guys we're not supposed to talk about theories.

stfu pete. you know as well as anybody that talking about general theories is a little different than taking something from an article regarding one of the major storylines of the entire series.

how is it different? the article is talking about a general theory too; just because it's "in print" doesn't make it any more legitimate than any other theory. furthermore, as i've said to you before, i was aware of the theory before the article; i just lazily choose to use that article instead of typing out the theory.

Meh, I don't want to go down this road again. You and I obviously disagree. For major plot points, I would just rather be surprised or piece it together myself than read about the possibility ahead of time (on a Pearl Jam board no less). It certainly takes a lot of steam out of it if I know of the possibility and it actually plays out that way. It's almost as if I'm now looking for it.

So people can't make predictions because if they're right it'll lessen the dramatic impact?

chris h 2 probably believes everything he reads on tmz

were you guys untangling the mereeneese knot?

what are you talking about?

cutuphalfdead wrote:So people can't make predictions because if they're right it'll lessen the dramatic impact?

so this is considered making a prediction in your book?

spike wrote:hey nerds, if stannis legitimizes jon snow as a stark, does that weaken his claim to the throne as a targaryen?

he's predicting that jon snow is actually a targaryen

maybe he could have been more clear and not stated it as fact, but that doesn't change anything

cutuphalfdead wrote:he's predicting that jon snow is actually a targaryen

maybe he could have been more clear and not stated it as fact, but that doesn't change anything

so people can make predictions all they want. but is it really that hard to hit the spoiler tag when doing so? I'm not the only one that feels this way, and it's really not asking a lot. but for you and spike, it's now about proving a point than anything else.

Chris_H_2 wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:he's predicting that jon snow is actually a targaryen

maybe he could have been more clear and not stated it as fact, but that doesn't change anything

so people can make predictions all they want. but is it really that hard to hit the spoiler tag when doing so? I'm not the only one that feels this way, and it's really not asking a lot. but for you and spike, it's now about proving a point than anything else.

fun fact: I did use the spoiler tag

Chris_H_2 wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:he's predicting that jon snow is actually a targaryen

maybe he could have been more clear and not stated it as fact, but that doesn't change anything

so people can make predictions all they want. but is it really that hard to hit the spoiler tag when doing so? I'm not the only one that feels this way, and it's really not asking a lot. but for you and spike, it's now about proving a point than anything else.

you're the one who brought it back up, guy.

cutuphalfdead wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:he's predicting that jon snow is actually a targaryen

maybe he could have been more clear and not stated it as fact, but that doesn't change anything

so people can make predictions all they want. but is it really that hard to hit the spoiler tag when doing so? I'm not the only one that feels this way, and it's really not asking a lot. but for you and spike, it's now about proving a point than anything else.

fun fact: I did use the spoiler tag

i confess, i have no idea to what specifically you're referring regarding your post. this all started with spike's post, and some people got all apoplectic because of the suggestion that it should've been spoilered. i thought it was a fairly harmless request. but others evidently didn't think so (hence the incessant references to me and predictions in the last 3 or so pages).

Chris_H_2 wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:he's predicting that jon snow is actually a targaryen

maybe he could have been more clear and not stated it as fact, but that doesn't change anything

so people can make predictions all they want. but is it really that hard to hit the spoiler tag when doing so? I'm not the only one that feels this way, and it's really not asking a lot. but for you and spike, it's now about proving a point than anything else.

fun fact: I did use the spoiler tag

i confess, i have no idea to what specifically you're referring regarding your post. this all started with spike's post, and some people got all apoplectic because of the suggestion that it should've been spoilered. i thought it was a fairly harmless request. but others evidently didn't think so (hence the incessant references to me and predictions in the last 3 or so pages).

are you new here?

spike wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:he's predicting that jon snow is actually a targaryen

maybe he could have been more clear and not stated it as fact, but that doesn't change anything

so people can make predictions all they want. but is it really that hard to hit the spoiler tag when doing so? I'm not the only one that feels this way, and it's really not asking a lot. but for you and spike, it's now about proving a point than anything else.

you're the one who brought it back up, guy.

i had nothing to do with others beating a dead horse the past week or so regarding making predictions.

cutuphalfdead wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:he's predicting that jon snow is actually a targaryen

maybe he could have been more clear and not stated it as fact, but that doesn't change anything

so people can make predictions all they want. but is it really that hard to hit the spoiler tag when doing so? I'm not the only one that feels this way, and it's really not asking a lot. but for you and spike, it's now about proving a point than anything else.

fun fact: I did use the spoiler tag

i confess, i have no idea to what specifically you're referring regarding your post. this all started with spike's post, and some people got all apoplectic because of the suggestion that it should've been spoilered. i thought it was a fairly harmless request. but others evidently didn't think so (hence the incessant references to me and predictions in the last 3 or so pages).

are you new here?

i might as well be

Chris_H_2 wrote:

spike wrote:

Chris_H_2 wrote:

cutuphalfdead wrote:he's predicting that jon snow is actually a targaryen

maybe he could have been more clear and not stated it as fact, but that doesn't change anything

so people can make predictions all they want. but is it really that hard to hit the spoiler tag when doing so? I'm not the only one that feels this way, and it's really not asking a lot. but for you and spike, it's now about proving a point than anything else.

you're the one who brought it back up, guy.

i had nothing to do with others beating a dead horse the past week or so regarding making predictions.

don't worry, you'll get the hang of this place eventually.

im on team chrish2, y'all are just being difficult

is chris really a lawyer?

spike wrote:is chris really a lawyer?

his location is "an office full of assholes" so i think he could be

Mecca wrote:

spike wrote:is chris really a lawyer?

his location is "an office full of assholes" so i think he could be

man, I thought the intentional redundancy was obvious

What do you want people to post in this thread, chrish2? Variations of "That was awesome," and nothing else?