Page 84 of 199

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 12:46 am
by verb_to_trust
Matt Damon is a hypocrite

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 12:49 am
by Strat
verb_to_trust wrote:Matt Damon is a hypocrite
how SJW of you.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 1:26 am
by 96583UP
shocker, a shallow, cosmetic 'investigation' in order to grant credibility to captain rape-rage

who would have thunk it possible

just confirm him and let's move on, back to the GOP taking advantage of everyone below the 35% tax bracket

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 1:58 am
by Electromatic
96583UP wrote:shocker, a shallow, cosmetic 'investigation' in order to grant credibility to captain rape-rage

who would have thunk it possible

just confirm him and let's move on, back to the GOP taking advantage of everyone below the 35% tax bracket

I just assumed they would cancel this nomination and find some Catholic lady judge or something.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 2:10 am
by 96583UP
the only hope is if Trump gets embarrassed because people start tweeting about how kavanaugh cried

trump hates crybabies and men who get shown up by women

the fate of the SCOTUS is in everyone's hands - don't expect the FBI to save you - just tweet about how Kavanaugh is a pussy and then Trump will dump him for being weak!

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 3:01 am
by B
I admit that I had to look up Devil's Triangle on urban dictionary.

"A pretend drinking game made up on 9/27/18 by "Honorable" Brett Kavanaugh when faced with credible allegations of sexual assault put forward by no less than four (so far) women. Devils triangle is a threesome with two men and one woman, not a drinking game like Quarters, as Kavanope would like everyone to believe. Devils triangle can also be defined as a lie told under perjury when a belligerent white male feels cornered when confronted with his own disgusting behavior, most likely with the blessing of a patriarchal and mysogynistic system."

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 3:03 am
by 96583UP
i wonder how many times he has watched mark judge's erect penis enter a minor's orifice

secrets of the universe

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 3:24 am
by BurtReynolds
B wrote:I admit that I had to look up Devil's Triangle on urban dictionary.

"A pretend drinking game made up on 9/27/18 by "Honorable" Brett Kavanaugh when faced with credible allegations of sexual assault put forward by no less than four (so far) women. Devils triangle is a threesome with two men and one woman, not a drinking game like Quarters, as Kavanope would like everyone to believe. Devils triangle can also be defined as a lie told under perjury when a belligerent white male feels cornered when confronted with his own disgusting behavior, most likely with the blessing of a patriarchal and mysogynistic system."
I'm no closer to knowing what that is.

"credible"

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 12:00 pm
by McParadigm

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 3:22 pm
by McParadigm
This study predates the Kavanaugh nomination, but I wonder if it explains a lot of the political disparity in responses.
Are individuals willing to reduce the suppression of prejudice in order to achieve partisan motivated goals? To answer this question, I fielded an experiment on a module to the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Study. The experiment appeared on the pre-selected questionairre and was administered to 1,000 respondents who were interviewed between September 28th and November 6th. The aim of the experiment was to examine whether introducing partisan motivations would influence how people reacted to sexist comments.

In the controlled condition, respondents were given the following hypothetical scenario:
“Imagine that during a conversation, a male acquaintence referred to one woman as ‘a dog’ and then later in the same conversation referred to his wife as ‘a beautiful piece of ass.’”

Respondents were then asked how these comments would make them feel on a five point scale, ranging from “very uncomfortable” to “very comfortable.”

In the treatment group, the same question was asked but attributed to a known political figure. Respondents were given the same five point scale for their responses.
Image

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 3:24 pm
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 3:39 pm
by bune
B wrote:Laughing from the first words out of Damon's mouth.

Nathan Fillion would have been a better choice.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 3:42 pm
by ---

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 4:12 pm
by BurtReynolds
McParadigm wrote:
He gives himself away with that last paragraph haha.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 4:28 pm
by bune
Image

It's funnier because comics are submitted weeks in advance.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 4:49 pm
by McParadigm
I think it’s reasonable to say that this insult is aimed at her as a reporter rather than as a woman, but...my dude....the optics of standing at a podium with a bunch of dead eyed besuited men and behaving this particular way at this particular time are not great.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 5:04 pm
by BurtReynolds
Now see, that's funny. You could learn something from this guy, strat.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 5:11 pm
by Superblood Wolfmoon
McParadigm wrote:I think it’s reasonable to say that this insult is aimed at her as a reporter rather than as a woman, but...my dude....the optics of standing at a podium with a bunch of dead eyed besuited men and behaving this particular way at this particular time are not great.
Here's what I don't get...why didn't she immediately challenge him on this? Clearly she heard what he said, and I get that it probably gets one flustered, but imagine if she had said, "Would you mind explaining what you meant by what you just said?" Nobody every puts this asshole on the spot.

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 7:03 pm
by BurtReynolds
I know we're moving on to the "ok, he didn't rape anybody, but he lied about drinking and he has a bad attitude" portion of the inquisition, but in case you still give any credibility to the third accuser...
And don't go digging into her history... https://apnews.com/amp/bccc4dd598df4e71 ... ssion=true

#believewomen

Re: The Supreme Court

Posted: Mon October 01, 2018 8:13 pm
by McParadigm
BurtReynolds wrote:I know we're moving on to the "ok, he didn't rape anybody, but he lied about drinking and he has a bad attitude" portion of the inquisition
I know we’re moving on to the “ok, he flagrantly lied about drinking and yearbook stuff, but he should still be believed about everything else because otherwise we can’t own the libs,” portion of the tribal meltdown, but why do you feel the need to also completely misrepresent non-conservatives as “moving on,” doubting the allegations of sexual assault that are currently under investigation?