Song of the Moment: Sirens

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

So...Sirens?

5 stars
47
38%
4 stars
30
24%
3 stars
25
20%
2 stars
7
6%
1 star
16
13%
 
Total votes: 125

User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43430
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by VinylGuy »

Listening to the live version.

Love it.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by stip »

bluestate wrote:
stip wrote: Pearl Jam's early identity was that they (and their fans) stood against this kind of music even though there was always probably a part of them that wanted to embrace it but were too embarrassed to do so because so much of it was mind numbing schlocky crap.
I used to convince myself of this in the early days but I can't buy into this logic anymore. If this was true there would've been at least a dozen PJ songs that would have never been written. As for Last Kiss, well I won't even go there.

and I think pearl jam moved in this direction long before many of their fans did--I think sirens is just more striking because it emulates something that was oppositional to what many of us thought pearl jam was/is.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by digster »

I don't know if it's necessarily that people are closed to any version of this type of music; I think, in some cases, it's more that there are certain tropes to this style of songwriting/production that are less aesthetic choices and more bad choices. Like, using the 80s power ballad thing as an example (not that Sirens is necessarily in that mold), I don't like the style because I've rarely heard times when the songwriting and production decisions inherent to that style didn't make a song suck more. Just saying this because I do sort of agree with plat that this isn't that far off the beaten path. It's maybe a song further down the road from where they went with Backspacer, in terms of production aesthetics.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by stip »

digster wrote:I don't know if it's necessarily that people are closed to any version of this type of music; I think, in some cases, it's more that there are certain tropes to this style of songwriting/production that are less aesthetic choices and more bad choices. Like, using the 80s power ballad thing as an example (not that Sirens is necessarily in that mold), I don't like the style because I've rarely heard times when the songwriting and production decisions inherent to that style didn't make a song suck more. Just saying this because I do sort of agree with plat that this isn't that far off the beaten path. It's maybe a song further down the road from where they went with Backspacer, in terms of production aesthetics.
I think this explains why you wouldn't like the song, not why you wouldn't be willing to engage it in the first place. And there were so many 180s in such a brief period of time, to a degree we never really saw here before, that there's got to be more going on. It's not like Sirens itself was a difficult song that required multiple listens to figure out musically...
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Lament »

Quadrophenia wrote:they put an (earlier?) version of "Alive" on a Coca-Cola cassette tape when I was 12
Sellouts.

RIP Pearl Jam.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

stip wrote:
digster wrote:I don't know if it's necessarily that people are closed to any version of this type of music; I think, in some cases, it's more that there are certain tropes to this style of songwriting/production that are less aesthetic choices and more bad choices. Like, using the 80s power ballad thing as an example (not that Sirens is necessarily in that mold), I don't like the style because I've rarely heard times when the songwriting and production decisions inherent to that style didn't make a song suck more. Just saying this because I do sort of agree with plat that this isn't that far off the beaten path. It's maybe a song further down the road from where they went with Backspacer, in terms of production aesthetics.
I think this explains why you wouldn't like the song, not why you wouldn't be willing to engage it in the first place. And there were so many 180s in such a brief period of time, to a degree we never really saw here before, that there's got to be more going on. It's not like Sirens itself was a difficult song that required multiple listens to figure out musically...
I think this is why I talked about the "massive new direction" thing that Jorge disagreed with. While the music is still within the Pearl Jam ballpark, the structural / arrangement / production choices are not, or haven't been in the past, at least. So, same problems many people had with The Fixer, but this is the second song to divide the community in such a way, and -- due to its length and subject matter -- a much bigger statement of intent. And it's not an intent that many thought PJ would ever have. I think the irony is that many would like to think that some members of PJ should be fighting this kind of music -- Jeff and Stone should be stamping their foot because this stuff is just so awful -- when in fact, all of the members look very happy and comfortable playing the song, at least given the very little interview and video evidence we have. It's almost as if Stone finds it a breath of fresh air, and some people are finding that kind of difficult.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by digster »

Stone can be as big a cheeseball as any of them, to be fair.
User avatar
Ledbetterdays
A Return To Form
Posts: 203
Joined: Tue January 29, 2013 3:45 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Ledbetterdays »

dimejinky99 wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:Can some kind soul point me in the direction of the link for the sirens video mp3 download please?

Hate getting bottom paged. Anyone able to help with this?

Sirens Video Audio
https://www.wetransfer.com/downloads/b3 ... 230/527cf8#
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

I really like the tone of Matt's drums in this song.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

OK, I think I've figured out one of the most difficult things to deal with when I heard the song for the first (twenty) time(s). The fucker has radically altered my perception of the album, and I was hoping we wouldn't get a song that did that. Before Sirens, I was joining the dots and getting a full picture... as I always do with every album, before the inevitable disappointment that it won't all fit. That's why I wish more had been made of the sirens / search-and-rescue backdrop of the song, because that would've fitted the theme more explicitly, although it sort of still does inadvertently. In as much as other songs are also about being in relationship in the midst of chaos.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

Holy shit, it does sound like Nickelback.

RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
dprival78
Future Drummer
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:13 pm
Location: CT

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by dprival78 »

harmless wrote:Holy shit, it does sound like Nickelback.

is that the record for most cliches packed into the first 30 seconds of a song?
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by McParadigm »

dprival78 wrote:
harmless wrote:Holy shit, it does sound like Nickelback.

is that the record for most cliches packed into the first 30 seconds of a song?
Previous record holder: Nickelback
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

McParadigm wrote:
dprival78 wrote:
harmless wrote:Holy shit, it does sound like Nickelback.

is that the record for most cliches packed into the first 30 seconds of a song?
Previous record holder: Nickelback
I guess the rebuttal for that would be "The only reason Sirens packs fewer cliches into the first 30 seconds is that the tempo is slower".
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by McParadigm »

Fun fact: Sirens contains the only recognizably profound circus in the history of history
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
dprival78
Future Drummer
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:13 pm
Location: CT

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by dprival78 »

harmless wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
dprival78 wrote:
harmless wrote:Holy shit, it does sound like Nickelback.

is that the record for most cliches packed into the first 30 seconds of a song?
Previous record holder: Nickelback
I guess the rebuttal for that would be "The only reason Sirens packs fewer cliches into the first 30 seconds is that the tempo is slower".
it does have its fair share.. but at least they're spread out a little.

and most importantly, not sung by a douche bag
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by McParadigm »

Maybe Ed stumbled upon a Chautauqua, and mistook it for a circus.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Lament »

dprival78 wrote:not sung by a douche bag
Image
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Lament »

Oh fuck guys, he's literally sitting on a Lightning Bolt in that picture.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16296
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Birds in Hell »

McParadigm wrote:I'm really starting to eat up the reverby slide-down guitar. That's a good overdub.
That's a favourite of mine too.

I wonder if I genuinely think this song is OK or if I'm just super, super into that guitar part.
Post Reply