The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52024
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

BurtReynolds wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Wait, there was a XXX 2?
Yes, the one with Ice Cube. State of the Union or something. It was a pretty big bomb.
Oh yeah. Ice Cube :roll: . Its probably better than the first one.
It isn't
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by dimejinky99 »

Luc Bessons Valerian sounds exciting.
http://collider.com/comic-con-2016-vale ... idersocial
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43426
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

The new Adam Winegard movie is actually Blair Witch 3. Weird marketing.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by bada »

I couldn't get through the King Arthur trailer.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by bada »

It looks like they are making King Kong bigger than usual. My guess is for a match up with Godzilla down the line.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

bada wrote:It looks like they are making King Kong bigger than usual. My guess is for a match up with Godzilla down the line.
Yeah, that's already been confirmed. 2020, I think. Movie looks cool.
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9474
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Rangi Guy »

VinylGuy wrote:The new Adam Winegard movie is actually Blair Witch 3. Weird marketing.
Direct sequel to the original - I'm intrigued
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43426
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

yeah, but i didnt understand why lie about it.." ey this movie is called the woods....NOPE ITS BLAIR WITCH!! HAHA WE ARE SO CLEVER "
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36765
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Jorge »

Maybe it just gets more people talking about it
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by BurtReynolds »

Blair Witch 2 wasn't bad. Blair Witch 1 was bad.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43426
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

I thought maybe the " blair witch franchise" was something they added after they did the movie, but nope, its a proper sequel to the original.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9474
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Rangi Guy »

BurtReynolds wrote:Blair Witch 2 wasn't bad. Blair Witch 1 was bad.
Blair Witch 1 is the only movie to give me the genuine scares
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51691
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 2:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9474
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Rangi Guy »

tragabigzanda wrote:
Rangi Guy wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Blair Witch 2 wasn't bad. Blair Witch 1 was bad.
Blair Witch 1 is the only movie to give me the genuine scares
Only movie ever? Man, the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre scared the daylights out of me.
It was creepy, but once it was over - it was done. Blair Witch stayed with me for a while
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52024
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Fire in the Sky scared me
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Fire in the Sky scared me
I had nightmares for years when I saw this as a kid.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

Simple Torture wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Fire in the Sky scared me
I had nightmares for years when I saw this as a kid.
Thanks a lot, ruddo, now I'm not going to sleep tonight.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9474
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Rangi Guy »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Fire in the Sky scared me
I haven't even heard of this
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

Rangi Guy wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Fire in the Sky scared me
I haven't even heard of this
Save it for when your kid is like 9 if you want to scar her for life.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9474
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Rangi Guy »

Simple Torture wrote:
Rangi Guy wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Fire in the Sky scared me
I haven't even heard of this
Save it for when your kid is like 9 if you want to scar her for life.
Noted! :thumbsup:
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
Post Reply