Re: NBA Thread
Posted: Fri April 25, 2014 4:36 am


You just described the Thunder's offense for the past 4 years.4/5 wrote:![]()
While that's an awesome .gif, Durant has been throwing up as many bad, ballhoggy, iso shots as Westbrook in this series. I know some of the credit has to go to Memphis, but OKC doesn't even look they run plays on offense. Every series it seems like there are three options:
1. Wild, pull up J from Westbrook or Durant.
2. Durant or Westbrook drive hard to the basket.
3. Wait until the shot clock is at 2 or 3 and chuck up a long J.
The thought of KD having the ball in his hands with his team within 20 points is frightening, but it's hard to see them winning the title playing offense that appears to be devoid of any actual scheme.Monkey_Driven wrote:You just described the Thunder's offense for the past 4 years.4/5 wrote:![]()
While that's an awesome .gif, Durant has been throwing up as many bad, ballhoggy, iso shots as Westbrook in this series. I know some of the credit has to go to Memphis, but OKC doesn't even look they run plays on offense. Every series it seems like there are three options:
1. Wild, pull up J from Westbrook or Durant.
2. Durant or Westbrook drive hard to the basket.
3. Wait until the shot clock is at 2 or 3 and chuck up a long J.
Brian Windhorst's tweet last night says it all...4/5 wrote:The thought of KD having the ball in his hands with his team within 20 points is frightening, but it's hard to see them winning the title playing offense that appears to be devoid of any actual scheme.Monkey_Driven wrote:You just described the Thunder's offense for the past 4 years.4/5 wrote:![]()
While that's an awesome .gif, Durant has been throwing up as many bad, ballhoggy, iso shots as Westbrook in this series. I know some of the credit has to go to Memphis, but OKC doesn't even look they run plays on offense. Every series it seems like there are three options:
1. Wild, pull up J from Westbrook or Durant.
2. Durant or Westbrook drive hard to the basket.
3. Wait until the shot clock is at 2 or 3 and chuck up a long J.

Watched it last night. I could watch a whole doc on a Pistons/Bulls rivalry.bada wrote:I watched the Bad Boys Doc today. The Nene/Butler fight was cute in comparison.
Lament wrote:
Why don't the 1970-1971 Milwaukee Bucks figure into more discussions about the greatest teams in NBA history?
one and doneLament wrote:Fell down into the basketball-reference.com wormhole tonight. Intense basketball nerd-dom to follow...
Why don't the 1970-1971 Milwaukee Bucks figure into more discussions about the greatest teams in NBA history?
http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/MIL/1971.html
66-16. Winning streaks of 20, 16, and 10 games. 12-2 postseason record with their smallest margin of postseason victory being 8 points. Kareem in his prime. Oscar a bit past it but still a force to be reckoned with. They obliterated a Lakers team that would go on to stake a claim as THE greatest team ever the next year (though as a homer I will always defer to the 1996 Bulls). But seriously, why don't they get mentioned alongside the 96 Bulls, 72 Lakers, 86 Celtics, 65 Celtics, 83 Sixers, etc.?
So were the 72 Lakers and 83 Sixers, but that doesn't stop people from creaming over them.spike wrote:one and done
Man do I fucking hate that guy.Harry Lime wrote:The much hated Bill Simmons
Yeah, this is painful.spike wrote:put jimmer in!
