Re: What movies are you watching?
Posted: Mon April 23, 2018 6:32 pm
Great, now I have a boner.durdencommatyler wrote:Monkey_Driven wrote:Everything is based on a true story...
from a certain point of view.
Great, now I have a boner.durdencommatyler wrote:Monkey_Driven wrote:Everything is based on a true story...
from a certain point of view.
Monkey_Driven wrote:Great, now I have a boner.durdencommatyler wrote:Monkey_Driven wrote:Everything is based on a true story...
from a certain point of view.

Stop it, I'm at work!durdencommatyler wrote:Monkey_Driven wrote:Great, now I have a boner.durdencommatyler wrote:Monkey_Driven wrote:Everything is based on a true story...
from a certain point of view.
the last third blowsMonkey_Driven wrote:Guys, I'm happy to report I am 2/3 of the way through Goodfellas!
I see what you did there. Do they allow movies in prison?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:the last third blowsMonkey_Driven wrote:Guys, I'm happy to report I am 2/3 of the way through Goodfellas!
yea just watched cocoMonkey_Driven wrote:I see what you did there. Do they allow movies in prison?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:the last third blowsMonkey_Driven wrote:Guys, I'm happy to report I am 2/3 of the way through Goodfellas!
Did everyone cry?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yea just watched cocoMonkey_Driven wrote:I see what you did there. Do they allow movies in prison?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:the last third blowsMonkey_Driven wrote:Guys, I'm happy to report I am 2/3 of the way through Goodfellas!
just Bruce and D’mitriMonkey_Driven wrote:Did everyone cry?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yea just watched cocoMonkey_Driven wrote:I see what you did there. Do they allow movies in prison?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:the last third blowsMonkey_Driven wrote:Guys, I'm happy to report I am 2/3 of the way through Goodfellas!
Godspeed.Anders wrote:Watching Justice League now.
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Verm can you tell me more about the ghost/skeleton/shrouded figure please.LoathedVermin72 wrote:Rewatching The Post. Man, this movie kinda floors me. Spielberg's natural intuition for composition - and I mean everything that entails: blocking, framing, lighting, camera movement, editing - is just unparalleled. I didn't even notice the first time (and no one seems to be talking about) how many floating long-takes are used, which I think is because they are so organic and seamless - the opposite of the show-stopping showiness of someone like Alfonso Cuaron. He always thinks about how each shot and cut will affect the whole of the work. There's one beautiful one near the beginning where the camera tracks characters while being separated by a row of desks before cutting through an aisle to get closer and then following them into an office and gracefully moving around them to the other side of the room. Just effortless, fluid, magnificent. Never calls attention to itself - it simply breathes naturally. The film is buoyed by constant, subtle visual vitality.
On top of that, Spielberg's love of character idiosyncrasies is in full effect; again, I keep noticing things I didn't catch the first time around, especially with Streep's character. Taking off her large earring to answer a phone call, for example. Just an consistent stream of tiny details to give the characters (and the movie) a sense of life and personality. My god, what a talent he is.
Im glad Im not the only one that may have been a little let down by the overall movie. There were moments I enjoyed and generally, its always a pleasure to watch these actors manage their craft, but there was a missing intensity of sorts. It fell a little flat for me.tragabigzanda wrote:Tom Hanks is usually great, but here he just looks tired. Meryl Streep is a snoozer in this movie. How many times did he go: "Oh...oh..." while trying to process the implications of whether or not she would let them run the story? Is hand-wringing-via-face what qualifies for top-shelf acting now?
But honestly, I don't blame either of them, I think the script was probably quite anemic. All of Spielberg's master craftsmanship holds up in spite of the thin material.