Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Posted: Tue September 17, 2013 11:23 pm
The videos going to be awful. We all know it. They suck at humour, they suck at videos. This song sucks. Pearl jam suck now.
That might be the biggest surprise I've had today!verb_to_trust wrote:Guys, I haven't heard this song but i'm pretty sure its going to suck.
Well, Pearl Jam has said nothing about it...BurtReynolds wrote:we're all assuming this is some purposeful direction. what if it isn't?
aside from "almost drowned in her pussy so I swam in her butt"harmless wrote:Well, Pearl Jam has said nothing about it...BurtReynolds wrote:we're all assuming this is some purposeful direction. what if it isn't?
I'm pretty annoying aren't i? I'm just pretty dissapointed is all. I'll stop now.bluestate wrote:I wonder how stupidmop feels about this song? He's been so quiet today.
harmless wrote:That might be the biggest surprise I've had today!verb_to_trust wrote:Guys, I haven't heard this song but i'm pretty sure its going to suck.
Ah, verb_to_trust, the Mentos of posters.WtOB? wrote:harmless wrote:That might be the biggest surprise I've had today!verb_to_trust wrote:Guys, I haven't heard this song but i'm pretty sure its going to suck.
harmless wrote:There's no way he's going to like this.
He is "Volunteer Troll" for the No Leak Club.dimejinky99 wrote:harmless wrote:There's no way he's going to like this.
Well of course he won't say he does on here, but with Pete it's usually a case of the lady doth protest too much.
Yeah, he's actually been fangirling out to it all day long, listening to it with the lights off. Finally was able to regain composure long enough to come in here and pretend ask for a link.dimejinky99 wrote:harmless wrote:There's no way he's going to like this.
Well of course he won't say he does on here, but with Pete it's usually a case of the lady doth protest too much.
it's gonna be funny when we all realize they were being completely serious all along and not trying to be cheesy.harmless wrote:Well, Pearl Jam has said nothing about it...BurtReynolds wrote:we're all assuming this is some purposeful direction. what if it isn't?
I realized this on my second listen. It's what made me pay closer attention.BurtReynolds wrote:it's gonna be funny when we all realize they were being completely serious all along and not trying to be cheesy.harmless wrote:Well, Pearl Jam has said nothing about it...BurtReynolds wrote:we're all assuming this is some purposeful direction. what if it isn't?
Worryingly I'm not even sure it means anything to PJ.Thenews15 wrote:I was thinking that Sirens is something PJ has never done, they've had cheesy but not like Sirens, but in some weird way couldn't that be seen as "experimental"? Because it's so different, and so produced? It's new....
Yep, that's what I'm going with. I do like the song though despite the cheese. Maybe because I'm older and I get the message. Not an angry teen no more and clearly it means a lot to PJ.
They've never *tried* to be cheesy but they're all cheesy and cheesy people don't realise they're cheesy.evenslow wrote:I realized this on my second listen. It's what made me pay closer attention.BurtReynolds wrote:it's gonna be funny when we all realize they were being completely serious all along and not trying to be cheesy.harmless wrote:Well, Pearl Jam has said nothing about it...BurtReynolds wrote:we're all assuming this is some purposeful direction. what if it isn't?