Page 87 of 606
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Mon August 08, 2016 8:10 pm
by epilogue
dimejinky99 wrote:By the way McGregor really isn't a big entity Hollywood wise. Whereas Sam Jackson is. He didn't fit in the prequels whatsoever.
If my Mom recognizes your face and knows your name and can name several things you've been in, you're a big enough deal to count in this conversation.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Mon August 08, 2016 8:12 pm
by @SkitchP
dimejinky99 wrote:Ok well maybe I'm saying it wrong. But the Rock campaigning Disney to be in one and cate Blanchett saying she wants to be in one. That kinda thing is what I'm on about. I just don't think that level of Hollywood suits Star Wars.
By the way McGregor really isn't a big entity Hollywood wise. Whereas Sam Jackson is. He didn't fit in the prequels whatsoever.
Right, but your post was in direct relation to Laura Dern. Sam Jackson? For Sure. Liam Neeson or Portman? Somewhat I can see it. But we're talking about Laura Dern in a presumably not super major role. I can not imagine it would be a distraction, and I doubt her name will appear about the fold on the poster. She's a recognizable face, but hardly a star or a "draw" at this point (and probably never really was)
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Mon August 08, 2016 8:16 pm
by epilogue
Laura Dern is amazing. Her performance in Inland Empire is good, exquisite to the point of anxiety. One of the greatest performances I can remember.
But I'm also a huge fan of her work in general.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Mon August 08, 2016 8:18 pm
by BurtReynolds
She's a good actress who can disappear into her roles. No problem here.
How about that random ass Max Von Sydow part in 7? What was the point in hiring him?
Oh yeah, because he kinda looks like Alec Guinness and Abrams must always remind us of the originals.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Mon August 08, 2016 8:25 pm
by dimejinky99
durdencommatyler wrote:Exactly. Sam Jackson didn't work because Sam Jackson. Not because it's Star Wars.
I would have the same concern about The Rock. But I'm open to being surprised by him, if it ever happens. Cat Blanchett should ABSOLUTELY be in a Star Wars movie. Right now! Is it too late to put in her R1? And Space Bear?
Someone said she would make a brilliant Sith Lord. I can't help but remember how WOEFULLY bad she was in that Indiana Jones film. Like horrendously bad.
Yet if she brought her A game she'd have a hard time making it different to Galadriel
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Mon August 08, 2016 8:39 pm
by epilogue
dimejinky99 wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:Exactly. Sam Jackson didn't work because Sam Jackson. Not because it's Star Wars.
I would have the same concern about The Rock. But I'm open to being surprised by him, if it ever happens. Cat Blanchett should ABSOLUTELY be in a Star Wars movie. Right now! Is it too late to put in her R1? And Space Bear?
Someone said she would make a brilliant Sith Lord. I can't help but remember how WOEFULLY bad she was in that Indiana Jones film. Like horrendously bad.
Yet if she brought her A game she'd have a hard time making it different to Galadriel
I've seen her in a lot of work (film and theater) since LotR and I've had no problem forgetting Galadriel. I get that this is closer to that than something like Blue Jasmine but I think the point still stands.
She's fine in Indy 4; I'd say forgettable more than "woefully bad." It's probably the worst movie I've seen her in. Her accent is hokey. But so much of that falls on that script and Speilberg. But, yes, if that's the only thing anyone has seen her in, they probably wouldn't have much faith in her. It's her lowest point.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Mon August 08, 2016 8:39 pm
by epilogue
BurtReynolds wrote:She's a good actress who can disappear into her roles. No problem here.
How about that random ass Max Von Sydow part in 7? What was the point in hiring him?
Oh yeah, because he kinda looks like Alec Guinness and Abrams must always remind us of the originals.
Yep. I'm sure that's exactly it. You nailed it.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Mon August 08, 2016 8:39 pm
by Strat
I met laura dern once. she stole ben harper from my conversation.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Mon August 08, 2016 8:40 pm
by epilogue
Strat wrote:I met laura dern once. she stole ben harper from my conversation.
That bitch
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Mon August 08, 2016 8:51 pm
by dimejinky99
durdencommatyler wrote:Strat wrote:I met laura dern once. she stole ben harper from my conversation.
That bitch

Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Mon August 08, 2016 10:42 pm
by @SkitchP
BurtReynolds wrote:She's a good actress who can disappear into her roles. No problem here.
Exactly! Turning away a good actress just because she is too recognizable seems very silly to me.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Mon August 08, 2016 11:10 pm
by LoathedVermin72
I hope The Rock plays Darth Maul
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Mon August 08, 2016 11:11 pm
by epilogue
That guy died, Jordan.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Tue August 09, 2016 12:29 am
by spike
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I hope The Rock plays Darth Maul

Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Tue August 09, 2016 1:57 am
by Strat
stip wrote:thats amazing. i hope thats true and wish i didnt watch it
i also hope (as ive said before) that this trilogy starts out with ren killing han and ends with his redemption
Kind of feel the same way as i wish i didnt watch it.
Its actually a really great theory and would be a wonderful story. Luke having to train his biggest and most fearsome enemies grand daughter and blood line. He kind of has to train her too. Now that she has been discovered and knows the potential of her power. You either train her the best you can or you let her easily slip to the dark side and destroy the galaxy again. With lukes failures at the jedi temple with Ren.....Can make for a great internal struggle with Luke.
I like the idea of the skywalker/palpatine flip. Though, i honestly can't imagine them casting this brilliant strong woman and making her evil - You know?
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Tue August 09, 2016 8:40 am
by dimejinky99
They won't go the reincarnation route. It's too much and how do you set that up and make it work in such a way that it doesn't look hammy?
Also agree with strat. They won't flip Rey. Not after the character becoming so loved and iconic. She might be tempted by the dark side but she cant go. Also pointed out by someone that anytime we see her being aggressive or angry, is in defence of someone else, bb8 Finn and Han. It's not an anger that's overwhelming her or eating her up inside insidiously as was the case with Anakin.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Tue August 09, 2016 2:57 pm
by epilogue
I'm not going to put money on Rey turning to the dark side. But I fully expect that she will be more challenged and fall further than Luke. I'd love to see her go full big bad. But I'm not 100% sold that they'll go that route.
Ren wanting to be dark and "being seduced" by the light is super compelling to me, though. And I really hope that happens.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Tue August 09, 2016 3:30 pm
by Strat
durdencommatyler wrote:I'm not going to put money on Rey turning to the dark side. But I fully expect that she will be more challenged and fall further than Luke. I'd love to see her go full big bad. But I'm not 100% sold that they'll go that route.
Ren wanting to be dark and "being seduced" by the light is super compelling to me, though. And I really hope that happens.
I like that they can flip it on its head like this. I remember conversation about these new characters and exploring what is actually good, or what is actually evil, and that its not a black and white issue.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Tue August 09, 2016 3:35 pm
by epilogue
Strat wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I'm not going to put money on Rey turning to the dark side. But I fully expect that she will be more challenged and fall further than Luke. I'd love to see her go full big bad. But I'm not 100% sold that they'll go that route.
Ren wanting to be dark and "being seduced" by the light is super compelling to me, though. And I really hope that happens.
I like that they can flip it on its head like this. I remember conversation about these new characters and exploring what is actually good, or what is actually evil, and that its not a black and white issue.
Star Wars needs more ambiguity. I love that. It's the anti-Greedo shot first mentality.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VIII (2017)
Posted: Tue August 09, 2016 3:43 pm
by Greedo
durdencommatyler wrote:Strat wrote:durdencommatyler wrote:I'm not going to put money on Rey turning to the dark side. But I fully expect that she will be more challenged and fall further than Luke. I'd love to see her go full big bad. But I'm not 100% sold that they'll go that route.
Ren wanting to be dark and "being seduced" by the light is super compelling to me, though. And I really hope that happens.
I like that they can flip it on its head like this. I remember conversation about these new characters and exploring what is actually good, or what is actually evil, and that its not a black and white issue.
Star Wars needs more ambiguity. I love that. It's the anti-Greedo shot first mentality.
wat