Re: Star Wars: Andor (Disney+)
Posted: Wed May 28, 2025 10:00 pm
I didn't ten years ago. I didn't twenty years ago. I'm certainly not going to start now.dimejinky99 wrote:Ah skitch
Try harder
Much harder
I didn't ten years ago. I didn't twenty years ago. I'm certainly not going to start now.dimejinky99 wrote:Ah skitch
Try harder
Much harder
I chuckled.Mecca wrote:I’m starting to think I got woodburn’d based on the lack of reaction to that pic
Through the transitive property he didspike wrote:He didn’t blow up the Death Star.
No. That's not how transitive property works.Mecca wrote:Through the transitive property he didspike wrote:He didn’t blow up the Death Star.
It’s math, B.B wrote:No. That's not how transitive property works.Mecca wrote:Through the transitive property he didspike wrote:He didn’t blow up the Death Star.
Those are progressive steps. That's just counting.Mecca wrote:It’s math, B.B wrote:No. That's not how transitive property works.Mecca wrote:Through the transitive property he didspike wrote:He didn’t blow up the Death Star.
Rogue One’s events transmit the plans for the Death Star -> Rebel Alliance uses said plans to plot the exhaust port target -> Death Star is blown up.
Nah, it was funny.Mecca wrote:I’m starting to think I got woodburn’d based on the lack of reaction to that pic
That’s literally the transitive property. Trust me; all of my math courses in college were philosophy coursesB wrote:Those are progressive steps. That's just counting.Mecca wrote:It’s math, B.B wrote:No. That's not how transitive property works.Mecca wrote:Through the transitive property he didspike wrote:He didn’t blow up the Death Star.
Rogue One’s events transmit the plans for the Death Star -> Rebel Alliance uses said plans to plot the exhaust port target -> Death Star is blown up.
Mecca wrote:That’s literally the transitive property. Trust me; all of my math courses in college were philosophy coursesB wrote:Those are progressive steps. That's just counting.Mecca wrote:It’s math, B.B wrote:No. That's not how transitive property works.Mecca wrote:Through the transitive property he didspike wrote:He didn’t blow up the Death Star.
Rogue One’s events transmit the plans for the Death Star -> Rebel Alliance uses said plans to plot the exhaust port target -> Death Star is blown up.
Is this an example of the transitive property? Rogue One’s events transmit the plans for the Death Star -> Rebel Alliance uses said plans to plot the exhaust port target -> Death Star is blown up.
No, this wouldn't be a classic example of the transitive property. The transitive property in logic states that if A relates to B, and B relates to C, then A relates to C through the same relationship.
Your example shows a causal chain where each step enables the next, but the relationships aren't the same throughout:
Rogue One → Death Star plans (transmission/acquisition)
Death Star plans → targeting strategy (analysis/planning)
Targeting strategy → Death Star destruction (execution/result)
A true transitive property example would be something like: "If Rogue One is before A New Hope, and A New Hope is before Empire Strikes Back, then Rogue One is before Empire Strikes Back" - where the relationship (chronological order) remains consistent.
Your Star Wars example is better described as a causal sequence or chain of events where each link enables the next outcome, rather than a transitive relationship.
That's fucking right.spike wrote:ah only in the Star Wars forum