Page 89 of 508

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 3:15 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Mecca wrote:Jorah the Explorer
is this a real character name
LV, I'm sick of this thread seeing the only action in this forum, and I watch the show. Let's talk about something else in another thread.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 3:34 pm
by LoathedVermin72
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Mecca wrote:Jorah the Explorer
is this a real character name
LV, I'm sick of this thread seeing the only action in this forum, and I watch the show. Let's talk about something else in another thread.
ok. what should we talk about?

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 3:37 pm
by Mecca
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Mecca wrote:Jorah the Explorer
is this a real character name
nope, his name is Jorah, which sounds like Dora and he has been exiled

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 3:46 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Mecca wrote:Jorah the Explorer
is this a real character name
LV, I'm sick of this thread seeing the only action in this forum, and I watch the show. Let's talk about something else in another thread.
ok. what should we talk about?
Vin Diesel?

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 4:30 pm
by Simple Torture
Mecca wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Mecca wrote:Jorah the Explorer
is this a real character name
nope, his name is Jorah, which sounds like Dora and he has been exiled
Oh, come on--you should have tried to convince him it was, and that since the books started in the '90s, it would've been tough to change the name. Get on your game!

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 4:34 pm
by jwfocker
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Mecca wrote:Jorah the Explorer
is this a real character name

jesus man. the fact you thought that was possible.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 4:39 pm
by LoathedVermin72
jwfocker wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Mecca wrote:Jorah the Explorer
is this a real character name

jesus man. the fact you thought that was possible.
i knew it wasn't real, but i wanted it to be

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 5:09 pm
by Mecca
Simple Torture wrote:
Mecca wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Mecca wrote:Jorah the Explorer
is this a real character name
nope, his name is Jorah, which sounds like Dora and he has been exiled
Oh, come on--you should have tried to convince him it was, and that since the books started in the '90s, it would've been tough to change the name. Get on your game!
if we lie to him, he may run away forever

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 5:31 pm
by E.H. Ruddock
what about Bran and those guys?

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 5:34 pm
by Mecca
E.H. Ruddock wrote:what about Bran and those guys?
they're under a tree

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Thu May 21, 2015 2:05 pm
by 15showsandcounting
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:what about Bran and those guys?
they're under a tree
Here's to hoping they forget about them.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Thu May 21, 2015 2:13 pm
by jwfocker
15showsandcounting wrote:
Mecca wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:what about Bran and those guys?
they're under a tree
Here's to hoping they forget about them.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Thu May 21, 2015 2:26 pm
by epilogue
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Same with last seasons perceived rape scene.

That one I understood the outrage. That was a character we are kinda supposed to have some affection for, despite prior bad acts. But beyond throwing Bran out a window he had mostly been portrayed as a good guy on the wrong side. Ramsey is and always had been a sadistic fuck. I don't think illustrating his brutality is particularly shocking.
You're making their point for them, then. That rape should only be shock value, which I disagree with.

I'm still not comfortable calling last season's scene a rape scene and neither are the show runners nor the actors involved. But that aside, who cares whether or not the character is supposed to be likable or not. That shouldn't change or alter the atrocity of the act.

Rape is okay when I guy I'm supposed to hate does it. But when it's a guy I kinda like, hey now! That's over the line! I can't get on board with that.

I'm not talking about the "show" and the shock factor, I'm talking about the audiences reaction to it. The shock about Jamie in a rapey situation I got. Ramsey doing it should not have surprised anyone. Honestly, I don't know how anyone can be shocked by anything on this show at this point.

This is a show known for its brutality, and often times beloved for it. Depicting the atrocious acts are part of illustrating the world they've created. To ignore something that likely would have occurred in this universe seems ridiculous.
I see. Sorry, I misunderstood what you were getting at. :thumbsup:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Thu May 21, 2015 3:42 pm
by @SkitchP
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Same with last seasons perceived rape scene.

That one I understood the outrage. That was a character we are kinda supposed to have some affection for, despite prior bad acts. But beyond throwing Bran out a window he had mostly been portrayed as a good guy on the wrong side. Ramsey is and always had been a sadistic fuck. I don't think illustrating his brutality is particularly shocking.
You're making their point for them, then. That rape should only be shock value, which I disagree with.

I'm still not comfortable calling last season's scene a rape scene and neither are the show runners nor the actors involved. But that aside, who cares whether or not the character is supposed to be likable or not. That shouldn't change or alter the atrocity of the act.

Rape is okay when I guy I'm supposed to hate does it. But when it's a guy I kinda like, hey now! That's over the line! I can't get on board with that.

I'm not talking about the "show" and the shock factor, I'm talking about the audiences reaction to it. The shock about Jamie in a rapey situation I got. Ramsey doing it should not have surprised anyone. Honestly, I don't know how anyone can be shocked by anything on this show at this point.

This is a show known for its brutality, and often times beloved for it. Depicting the atrocious acts are part of illustrating the world they've created. To ignore something that likely would have occurred in this universe seems ridiculous.
I see. Sorry, I misunderstood what you were getting at. :thumbsup:

I'm glad we worked this out Joey. I've been losing sleep

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Thu May 21, 2015 4:03 pm
by epilogue
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Same with last seasons perceived rape scene.

That one I understood the outrage. That was a character we are kinda supposed to have some affection for, despite prior bad acts. But beyond throwing Bran out a window he had mostly been portrayed as a good guy on the wrong side. Ramsey is and always had been a sadistic fuck. I don't think illustrating his brutality is particularly shocking.
You're making their point for them, then. That rape should only be shock value, which I disagree with.

I'm still not comfortable calling last season's scene a rape scene and neither are the show runners nor the actors involved. But that aside, who cares whether or not the character is supposed to be likable or not. That shouldn't change or alter the atrocity of the act.

Rape is okay when I guy I'm supposed to hate does it. But when it's a guy I kinda like, hey now! That's over the line! I can't get on board with that.

I'm not talking about the "show" and the shock factor, I'm talking about the audiences reaction to it. The shock about Jamie in a rapey situation I got. Ramsey doing it should not have surprised anyone. Honestly, I don't know how anyone can be shocked by anything on this show at this point.

This is a show known for its brutality, and often times beloved for it. Depicting the atrocious acts are part of illustrating the world they've created. To ignore something that likely would have occurred in this universe seems ridiculous.
I see. Sorry, I misunderstood what you were getting at. :thumbsup:

I'm glad we worked this out Joey. I've been losing sleep
:lol:

I do completely agree with your post, by the way. I'm sorry I didn't say that directly. Good chat, friend.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Thu May 21, 2015 5:11 pm
by LoathedVermin72
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Same with last seasons perceived rape scene.

That one I understood the outrage. That was a character we are kinda supposed to have some affection for, despite prior bad acts. But beyond throwing Bran out a window he had mostly been portrayed as a good guy on the wrong side. Ramsey is and always had been a sadistic fuck. I don't think illustrating his brutality is particularly shocking.
You're making their point for them, then. That rape should only be shock value, which I disagree with.

I'm still not comfortable calling last season's scene a rape scene and neither are the show runners nor the actors involved. But that aside, who cares whether or not the character is supposed to be likable or not. That shouldn't change or alter the atrocity of the act.

Rape is okay when I guy I'm supposed to hate does it. But when it's a guy I kinda like, hey now! That's over the line! I can't get on board with that.

I'm not talking about the "show" and the shock factor, I'm talking about the audiences reaction to it. The shock about Jamie in a rapey situation I got. Ramsey doing it should not have surprised anyone. Honestly, I don't know how anyone can be shocked by anything on this show at this point.

This is a show known for its brutality, and often times beloved for it. Depicting the atrocious acts are part of illustrating the world they've created. To ignore something that likely would have occurred in this universe seems ridiculous.
I see. Sorry, I misunderstood what you were getting at. :thumbsup:

I'm glad we worked this out Joey. I've been losing sleep
:lol:

I do completely agree with your post, by the way. I'm sorry I didn't say that directly. Good chat, friend.
aww, what a nice exchange




now rape each other

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Thu May 21, 2015 5:19 pm
by epilogue
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Same with last seasons perceived rape scene.

That one I understood the outrage. That was a character we are kinda supposed to have some affection for, despite prior bad acts. But beyond throwing Bran out a window he had mostly been portrayed as a good guy on the wrong side. Ramsey is and always had been a sadistic fuck. I don't think illustrating his brutality is particularly shocking.
You're making their point for them, then. That rape should only be shock value, which I disagree with.

I'm still not comfortable calling last season's scene a rape scene and neither are the show runners nor the actors involved. But that aside, who cares whether or not the character is supposed to be likable or not. That shouldn't change or alter the atrocity of the act.

Rape is okay when I guy I'm supposed to hate does it. But when it's a guy I kinda like, hey now! That's over the line! I can't get on board with that.

I'm not talking about the "show" and the shock factor, I'm talking about the audiences reaction to it. The shock about Jamie in a rapey situation I got. Ramsey doing it should not have surprised anyone. Honestly, I don't know how anyone can be shocked by anything on this show at this point.

This is a show known for its brutality, and often times beloved for it. Depicting the atrocious acts are part of illustrating the world they've created. To ignore something that likely would have occurred in this universe seems ridiculous.
I see. Sorry, I misunderstood what you were getting at. :thumbsup:

I'm glad we worked this out Joey. I've been losing sleep
:lol:

I do completely agree with your post, by the way. I'm sorry I didn't say that directly. Good chat, friend.
aww, what a nice exchange




now rape each other
Sorry, J, I have to pretend to give you a little bit of shit about this joke otherwise thip is gonna flip out. So...

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Thu May 21, 2015 5:33 pm
by Mike

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 5:59 pm
by doone
@SkitchP wrote:The Ramsey alone element isn't shocking for his part, but based on the final shot, the rape of Sansa Stark is about whether or not Theon Greyjoy is able to be redeemed. Will something so horrific be enough to overcome his fears? It had to be horrific, to illustrate that if he does not react, he is gone forever.
this

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Posted: Mon May 25, 2015 2:36 am
by MitchCumstein
So Jon Snow's steward, Ollie I think, is making me fucking nervous. They just keep showing him giving stink eye. That little fucker is going to do something bad.